THE EFFECT OF SMARTPHONE ADDICTION ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE, PERCEIVED STRESS AND SATISFACTION WITH LIFE

Main Article Content

Zia-Ul-Ain Sabiha
Farzeen Khan
Ayesha
Hoor Rahat
Saira Khan
Raazia Khan
Maryam Ali Khan
Rida Saeed

Keywords

smartphone, addiction, mental health, academic performance / Grades, satisfaction with life, university going student

Abstract

Background: The pervasiveness of smartphones has led to an increase in smartphone addiction, raising concerns about its impact on various aspects of individuals' lives.


Objectives: The objectives of this research were to analyze the frequency of smartphone addiction, investigate its male to female ratio, explore its effects on academic performance, mental health indicators, and satisfaction with life, and compare these outcomes between individuals with and without smartphone addiction.


Methodology: This cross-sectional analytical study utilized random sampling to investigate smartphone addiction among 229 university students aged 18 to 25 years from various institutes in Peshawar, Pakistan. Data collection involved validated questionnaires assessing smartphone addiction, perceived stress, and satisfaction with life. Exclusion criteria eliminated non-smartphone users and questionnaires with invalid responses. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS-19, employing Pearson correlation coefficients and hierarchical multiple regression to explore associations between smartphone addiction and related variables.


Results: Out of a total of 229 participants, 99 were men (59.17%) and 130 were girls (64.28%). About 123 (53.7%) of the teenagers were dependent on their phones, with 114 (49.7%) having access to the internet via their handsets. Of them, 64 (52.03%) were female and 59 (47.96%) were male. Addiction to smartphones was also associated with an increase in felt stress (p=0.01) and a decrease in academic performance (-.151, p=0.05). Life happiness was not correlated with gender, age, or any other demographic variable.


Conclusion: Smartphone addiction has negative impact on perceived stress and academic performance while it does not have any effect on an individual’s satisfaction with life directly but it may effect it indirectly by raising perceived stress.

Abstract 161 | PDF Downloads 46

References

1. Lee, H. J., & Kim, M. (2018). The Internet of Things in a smart connected world. Internet of Things-Technology, Applications and Standardization, 91.
2. May, P. (2001). Mobile commerce: Opportunities, applications, and technologies of wireless business (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press.
3. Fu, S., Chen, X., & Zheng, H. (2021). Exploring an adverse impact of smartphone overuse on academic performance via health issues: a stimulus-organism-response perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(7), 663-675.
4. Cao, X., Masood, A., Luqman, A., & Ali, A. (2018). Excessive use of mobile social networking sites and poor academic performance: Antecedents and consequences from stressor-strain-outcome perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 163-174.
5. Anshari, M., Almunawar, M. N., Shahrill, M., Wicaksono, D. K., & Huda, M. (2017). Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference?. Education and Information technologies, 22, 3063-3079.
6. Rajan Y, P., Aiswarya, B., & Selvi A, J. A. (2023). Disruptive charms of wearable technologies: Navigating digital distractions and work performance. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases, 20438869231203341.
7. Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E., & Chein, J. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 251723.
8. Heltzel, N. (2014). Cell Phone Cyberbullying's Impact on Victims' Attendance, Academics, and Social and Personal Life in School: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study.
9. Cheng, X., & Lin, H. (2023). Mechanisms from academic stress to subjective well-being of Chinese adolescents: the roles of academic burnout and internet addiction. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 4183-4196.
10. Yang, H., Liu, B., & Fang, J. (2021). Stress and problematic smartphone use severity: smartphone use frequency and fear of missing out as mediators. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 659288.
11. Shanmugasundaram, M., & Tamilarasu, A. (2023). The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review. Frontiers in Cognition, 2, 1203077.
12. Farinha, V. (2022). The Relationship Between Reasons for Social Media Use, Levels of Social Comparison, and Changes to State Self-Esteem (Doctoral dissertation, William James College).
13. Qiu, Y. (2024). Social Comparison on Social Media Platforms: A media and communication Perspective. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 185, p. 03008). EDP Sciences.
14. Venkatesh E., Jemal M. Y. A., Samani A. S. A. Smartphone usage and addiction among dental students in Saudi Arabia: a cross sectional study. Int. J. Adolesc. Med. Health,2017:10: 1–6.
15. Lachmann B., Duke É. , Sariyska, R., & Montag, C. Who’s addicted to the smartphone and/or the Internet? Psychology of Popular Media Culture,2017: 8(3):182–189
16. Hechanova R. , Czincz J. Internet addiction in Asia: Reality or myth? (2009) http://hdl.handle.net/10625/38567.
17. Kaye B.K., Johnson T.J., 2004. A Web for all reasons: The uses and gratifications of Internet resources for political information. Telematics and Informatics – An interdisciplinary journal on the social impacts of new technologies, 21(3)
18. Papacharissi Z. , Rubin M.A. Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,2000: 44 (2):175–196
19. Csikszentmihalyi M. , Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.).”Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness” Cambridge university press (1992)
20. Csikszentmihalyi M. If we are so rich, why aren't we happy? AmericanPsychologist,1999:54(10):821-827
21. Alton E.M. , Trafton J.G. , Hambrick D.Z. ,”Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2014:143(1):215-226
22. Rennecker J, Godwin L. Delays and interruptions: A self-perpetuating paradox of communication technology use Information and Organization,2005:15:247-266
23. Markowetz A. Digitaler Burnout. Warum unsere permanente Smartphone-Nutzung gefährlich ist. Droemer HC, Münche,2015
24. Mozes A. (2012, December 4). Can excessive cellphone use become an addiction? U.S. News & World Report. Health Day.
25. Thomée S., Härenstam A. , Hagberg M. Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults-a prospective cohort study. BMC public health,2011:11(1): 66
26. Kwon M., Kim D.J., Cho H., Yang S. The Smartphone Addiction Scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. 2013: PLoS One, 8(12), e83558.
27. van den Eijnden, R. J., Lemmens J. S., Valkenburg P. M.The Social Media Disorder Scale. Computers in Human Behavior2016:61:478–487C.A. Hoffner, S. Lee. ”Mobile phonE use, emotion regulation, and well-being” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2015:18:pp. 411-416,)
28. Reid Chassiakos YL, Radesky J, Christakis D, Moreno MA, Cross C .Children and Adolescents and Digital Media. Nov,2016. Pediatrics. 138 (5): e20162593
29. Brand M. , Young K.S. , Laier C. , Wölfling, K. , Potenza M.N. “Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model.” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016, 71, 252–266
30. Duke É., Montag C. (2017a). Smartphone addiction and beyond: Initial insights on an emerging research topic and its relationship to Internet addiction. In C. Montag & M. Reuter (Eds.), Internet addiction: Neuroscientific approaches and therapeutical implications including smartphone addiction (pg. 359–372). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Geser, H. Towards a Sociological Theory of the Mobile Phone.2004 http://socio.ch/mobile/t_geser1.pdf. Accessed 16th, November,2019
31. Shin D. C., Johnson D. M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475–492.

Most read articles by the same author(s)