QSAR STUDIES ON BICALUTAMIDE DRUG FOR PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT

Main Article Content

Ayesha Hassan
Sadia Afsheen
Danish Abbas
Bilal Atiq
Atiqa Saleem
Dawood Zia
Muhammad Irfan
Zain Ul Abideen
Hamza Mobeen
Muhammad Abu-Bakar Sidique

Keywords

Prostate Cancer, Bicalutamide Drug, QSAR, Androgen Receptor, Inhibition, Cancer Cell Lines

Abstract

Prostate Cancer (PC) is a dangerous and deadliest type of cancer it is the main reason of male death globally. The development of new and stronger anti-prostate cancer composites is a constant requirement.  It can also be associated with alterations in AR functions. Indeed, androgen blockade by drugs that prevent the production of androgens and/or block the action of the AR inhibits prostate cancer growth. For its treatment, a very effective drug is used named as Bicalutamide. This drug is used to block the androgen action. It works by preventing testosterone from binding to the androgen receptors in prostate cancer cells. As a means to improve the effectiveness of the Bicalutamide drug, and in order to exploit the well-established potential of the fluorine atom in enhancing the pharmacological properties and drug-like physicochemical characteristics of candidate compounds, a wide array of diverse new structures has been designed and synthesized, through the introduction of fluoro-, trifluoromethyl- and trifluoromethoxy groups in diverse positions of both aromatic rings of the parent scaffolds. We have employed 2D and 3D QSAR approaches to identify the best descriptor to design better active compounds. In the 2D QSAR method, different types of descriptors existed from which some were eliminated due to their same or zero value. Overall 192 descriptors from which 142 were eliminated and 50 were used for further analysis. In LNCAP and VCaP cell lines, the correlation coefficient (R2) values 0.99 were after pruning. In 3D QSAR, The generated model against the 22Rv1 cell line (by CoMFA and CoMSIA) gave the best results. The q2 value for CoMFA is 0.365 and for CoMSIA is 0.430 against the 22Rv1 cell line. We conclude that 2D QSAR in LNCaP and VCaP had better results compared to other cell lines whereas in 3D QSAR, dataset compounds yielded better results against the 22Rv1 cell line.

Abstract 238 | PDF Downloads 60

References

1. Obeagu, E. I. (2023). Prevention and Early detection of Prostate Cancer. Int. J. Curr. Res. Med. Sci, 9(7), 20-24.
2. Khodabandeh, M. (2024). Prostate Cancer and Quality of Life in the Elderly: A Literature Review. Translational Research in Urology, 6(2), 76-83.
3. Hashemi, M., Zandieh, M. A., Talebi, Y., Rahmanian, P., Shafiee, S. S., Nejad, M. M., ... & Taheriazam, A. (2023). Paclitaxel and docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer: Molecular mechanisms and possible therapeutic strategies. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 160, 114392.
4. Fleshner NE, Lucia MS, Egerdie B, et al. Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: The REDEEM randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1103-1111.
5. Akaza H, Hinotsu S, Usami M, et al. Combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide for advanced prostate cancer: Long-term follow-up of a phase 3, double-blind, randomized study for survival. Cancer. 2009;115:3437-3445.
6. Horoszewicz JS, Leong SS, Kawinski E, Karr JP, Rosenthal H, Chu TM, Mirand EA, Murphy GP (April 1983). "LNCaP model of human prostatic carcinoma". Cancer Res. 43(4): 1809–18
7. Woods-Burnham L1, Basu A1, Cajigas-Du Ross CK1, Love A1, Yates C2, De Leon M1, Roy S3, Casiano CA1,4. The 22Rv1 prostate cancer cell line carries mixed genetic ancestry: Implications for prostate cancer health disparities research using pre-clinical models. 2017 Dec;77(16):1601-1608
8. Korenchuk, S; Lehr, JE; MClean, L; Lee, YG; Whitney, S; Vessella, R; Lin, DL; Pienta, KJ (2001). "VCaP, a cell-based model system of human prostate cancer". In vivo (Athens, Greece). 15 (2): 163–8
9. Alimirah F, Chen J, Basrawala Z, Xin H, Choubey D (April 2006). "DU-145 and PC-3 human prostate cancer cell lines express androgen receptor: implications for the androgen receptor functions and regulation"
10. Gallagher, R., Fleshner, N. (1998) Prostate cancer: 3. Individual risk factors. Canadian Medical Association. 159(7): 807-813
11. Tan, M. H., Li, J., Xu, H. E., Melcher, K., & Yong, E. L. (2015). Androgen receptor: structure, role in prostate cancer and drug discovery. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 36(1), 3-23.
12. Clark, L., Combs, G., Turnbull, B., Slate, E., Chalker, D., Chow, J. (1996) Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skim. Journal of the American Medical Association. 267: 1957-1963
13. Redman, M., Tangen, C., Goodman, P., Lucia, M., Coltman, C., Thompson, I. (2008) Finsteride does not increase the risk of high-grade prostate cancer: a bias-adjusted modeling approach. Cancer Prevention and Research. 1(3): 174-181
14. Muratov, E. N., Varlamova, E. V., Artemenko, A. G., Polishchuk, P. G., & Kuz'min, V. E. (2012). Existing and developing approaches for QSAR analysis of mixtures. Molecular informatics, 31(3‐4), 202-221.
15. Mendelsohn, L. D. (2004). ChemDraw 8 ultra, windows and macintosh versions. Journal of chemical information and computer sciences, 44(6), 2225-2226.
16. Real-Time PyMOL Visualization for Rosetta and PyRosetta Evan H. Baugh, Sergey Lyskov, Brian D. Weitzner, Jeffrey J. Gray. Published: August 16, 2011.
17. Human Androgen Receptor Inhibitors: Computational 3D QSAR Studies to Design Lead Compounds for Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Yayın tarihi 30 Eylül, 2013 © TurkJBiochem.com [Published online 30 September, 2013].
18. Youssef AM, Neeland EG, Villanueva EB, White MS, El-Ashmawy IM, et al. (2010) Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel pyrazole compounds. Bioorg Med Chem 18:5685-5696.
19. Structural basis for antagonism and resistance of bicalutamide in prostate cancer. Casey E. Bohl, Wenqing Gao, Duane D. Miller, Charles E. Bell, and James T. DaltonPNAS April 26, 2005. 102 (17) 6201-6206;Edited by John Kuriyan, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved March 16, 2005.
20. Bhandari, S. V., Nagras, O. G., Kuthe, P. V., Sarkate, A. P., Waghamare, K. S., Pansare, D. N., ... & Belwate, M. C. (2023). Design, synthesis, molecular docking and antioxidant evaluation of benzimidazole-1, 3, 4 oxadiazole derivatives. Journal of Molecular Structure, 1276, 134747.
21. Molecular modeling of heme proteins using MOE: Bio‐inorganic and structure‐function activity for undergraduates*S, Gigi B. Ray, J. Whitney Cook 03 November 2006.
22. Cher, ML, Bova, GS, Moore, DH, Small, EJ, Carroll, PR, Pin, SS, Epstein, JI, Isaacs, WB & Jensen, RH (1996). Genetic alterations in untreated metastases and androgen-independent prostate cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization and allelotyping. Cancer Res 56: 3091–3102.
23. Hadzi-Djokic, J. (2024). Hormone Therapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer. In Prostate Cancer: Advancements in the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Personalized Therapy (pp. 295-324). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
24. Vyas, V. K., Ghate, M., & Katariya, H. (2011). 2D and 3D-QSAR study on 4-anilinoquinozaline derivatives as potent apoptosis inducer and efficacious anticancer agent. Organic and medicinal chemistry letters, 1, 1-11.
25. Veras, L. D. S., Arakawa, M., Funatsu, K., & Takahata, Y. (2010). 2D and 3D QSAR studies of the receptor binding affinity of progestins. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, 21, 872-881.
26. Jain, S. V., Ghate, M., Bhadoriya, K. S., Bari, S. B., Chaudhari, A., & Borse, J. S. (2012). 2D, 3D-QSAR and docking studies of 1, 2, 3-thiadiazole thioacetanilides analogues as potent HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Organic and medicinal chemistry letters, 2, 1-13.

Most read articles by the same author(s)