INCIDENCE OF CORONARY ARTERY DOMINANCE AND PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH ACS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTIONS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Coronary Dominance, Proximal LAD, STE-ACS patients, Primary PCI
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the Incidence in terms of presentation and in-hospital course between patients with right vs. left dominant arterial circulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI
Methodology: We included consecutive adult (≥18 years) patients diagnosed with STE-ACS/NSTE-ACS undergoing PPCI /Emergent PCI . Patients were categorized into right vs. left dominant circulation on left heart catheterization. Demographic, clinical characteristics, presentation, and hospital course were compared between the matched (propensity matched) and unmatched cohort of patients with right vs. left dominance.
Results: We included 900 patients, out of which 81.3% (720) were males and mean age was 54.59 ± 11.3 years. On coronary angiogram left dominance was observed in 14.3% (111). Single vessel disease was higher with left compared to right dominant system, 53.2% vs. 43.5%, respectively. The rate of slow flow/no-reflow (15.4% vs. 7.2%; p=0.0.230), heart failure (9.3% vs. 6.3%; p=0.299), and in-hospital mortality (5.1% vs. 3.6%, p=0.493) were not different between right vs. left dominance, respectively. In the matched cohorts, the frequency of slow flow/no-reflow (15.3% vs. 7.2%; p=0.056), heart failure (6.3% vs. 6.3%; p>0.999), and mortality (5.4% vs. 3.6%, p=0.493) were not different between right vs. left dominance, respectively.
Conclusion: No significant increase in complications and outcomes is witnessed among patients with left dominant arterial circulation undergoing primary PCI for culprit proximal LAD. However, careful handling of left main during intervention is warranted due lack of support from right system.
References
2. Raheem A, Ahmed S, Kakar AW, Majeed H, Tareen I, Tariq K, et al. Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases in South Asian Region from 1990 to 2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Pak Heart J. 2022;55(1):15-21.
3. Thomas H, Diamond J, Vieco A, Chaudhuri S, Shinnar E, Cromer S, et al. Global atlas of cardiovascular disease. Glob Heart. 2018;13:143-63.
4. Vogel B, Claessen BE, Arnold SV, Chan D, Cohen DJ, Giannitsis E, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):1-20.
5. Rosselló X, Huo Y, Pocock S, Van de Werf F, Chin CT, Danchin N, et al. Global geographical variations in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction management and post-discharge mortality. Int J Cardiol. 2017;245:27-34.
6. Wu C, Camacho FT, King III SB, Walford G, Holmes Jr DR, Stamato NJ, et al. Risk stratification for long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation: Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(1):80-7.
7. Khan MS, Usman MS, Akhtar T, Raza S, Deo S, Kalra A, et al. Meta-analysis evaluating the effect of left coronary dominance on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2018;122(12):2026-34.
8. Azour L, Steinberger S, Toussie D, Titano R, Kukar N, Babb J, et al. Influence of coronary dominance on coronary artery calcification burden. Clin Imag. 2021;77:283-6.
9. Abu-Assi E, Castiñeira-Busto M, González-Salvado V, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Abumuaileq RR, Peña-Gil C, et al. Coronary artery dominance and long-term prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016;69(1):19-27.
10. He C, Ma YL, Wang CS, Song Y, Tang XF, Zhao XY, et al. Effect of coronary dominance on 2‐year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89(S1):549-54.
11. Ilia R, Rosenshtein G, Weinstein JM, Cafri C, Abu-Ful A, Gueron M. Left anterior descending artery length in left and right coronary artery dominance. Coron Artery Dis. 2001;12(1):77-8.
12. Hossain MA, Azam SA, Khalequzzaman M, Chowdhury TA, Jafar AH, Roy SS. Association of Left Coronary Dominance with In-Hospital Adverse Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cardiovasc J. 2017;9(2):129-34.
13. Mikaeilvand A, Firuozi A, Basiri H, Varghaei A, Izadpanah P, Kojuri J, et al. Association of coronary artery dominance and mortality rate and complications in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Res Med Sci. 2020;25:107.
14. Parikh NI, Honeycutt EF, Roe MT, Neely M, Rosenthal EJ, Mittleman MA, et al. Left and codominant coronary artery circulations are associated with higher in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: report From the National Cardiovascular Database Cath Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CathPCI) Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(6):775-82.
15. Veltman CE, van der Hoeven BL, Hoogslag GE, Boden H, Kharbanda RK, de Graaf MA, et al. Influence of coronary vessel dominance on short-and long-term outcome in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(17):1023-30.
16. Peng L, Guo X, Gao Y, Guo Q, Zhang J, Fang B, et al. Impact of right coronary dominance on triple-vessel coronary artery disease: A cross-sectional study. Medicine. 2018;97(32).
17. Wang L, Li J, Gao Y, Li R, Zhang J, Su D, et al. Association between coronary dominance and acute inferior myocardial infarction: a matched, case-control study. BMC Cardiovasc Disorders. 2019;19(1):1-7.
18. Yan B, Yang J, Fan Y, Zhao B, Ma Q, Yang L, et al. Association of coronary dominance with the severity of coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study in Shaanxi Province, China. BMJ Open. 2018;8(11):e021292.