GENDER DIFFERENCES IN CLINICAL OUTCOMES AMONG STEMI PATIENTS UNDERGOING PRIMARY PCI: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY FROM A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Main Article Content

Kiran Zahra
Sumaiya Muhammad Iqbal Memon
Jahanzeb
Salma
Sonia Bai
Khadija Sarwat Farooqui

Keywords

STEMI, primary PCI, gender differences, heart failure, mortality, cardiovascular outcomes.

Abstract

Background: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a major cause of death worldwide. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred treatment, restoring coronary blood flow to reduce mortality. However, women often experience worse outcomes after STEMI compared to men.


Objective: This study aimed to assess gender differences in clinical outcomes, focusing on in-hospital mortality and heart failure among STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.


Methods: A prospective study was conducted at Department of Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Karachi in the Duration from 3rd January 2018 to 2nd July 2018. The study included 298 STEMI patients aged 35-70 years who underwent primary PCI. Of these, 154 were females (51.7%) and 144 were males (48.3%). Data on demographics, clinical features, and outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 25. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables as percentages. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to control for confounding factors.


Results: Female patients showed a higher rate of heart failure (12.8% vs. 6.1%, p=0.011) and in-hospital mortality (7.0% vs. 3.5%, p=0.020) compared to males. The odds ratio for heart failure in females was 0.389 (95% CI 0.185-0.817), and for mortality, it was 0.310 (95% CI 0.111-0.870). Stent thrombosis rates were similar between genders (1.7% each, p=0.707). Major bleeding was more frequent in females (2.3% vs. 1.4%), though the difference was not significant (p=0.770).


Conclusion: This study reveals significant gender disparities in STEMI outcomes after primary PCI, with women at greater risk for heart failure and in-hospital mortality. These findings highlight the need for tailored strategies in STEMI management to improve outcomes for women.

Abstract 66 | PDF Downloads 20

References

1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119-177. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
2. Reed GW, Rossi JE, Cannon CP. Acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2017;389(10065):197-210. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30677-8.
3. Mehta LS, Beckie TM, DeVon HA, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in women: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(9):916-947. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000351.
4. Maas AH, Appelman YE. Gender differences in coronary heart disease. Neth Heart J. 2010;18(12):598-602. doi:10.1007/s12471-010-0841-y.
5. Berger JS, Elliott L, Gallup D, et al. Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2009;302(8):874-882. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1227.
6. Vaccarino V, Badimon L, Corti R, et al. Ischaemic heart disease in women: Are there sex differences in pathophysiology and risk factors? Position paper from the working group on coronary pathophysiology and microcirculation of the European Society of Cardiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;90(1):9-17. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvq394.
7. Syed Shabahat Ali Shah, Arshad Ali Shah, Afzal Qasim, et al. Association between TIMI Risk Score and in-Hospital Mortality in Acute STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary PCI. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(1):158. doi:10.53350/pjmhs20221611158.
8. Vaccarino V, Parsons L, Every NR, et al. Sex-based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(4):217-225. doi:10.1056/NEJM199907223410401.
9. Chandrasekhar J, Mehran R, Reid KJ, et al. Sex-based differences in outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(26):3383-3393. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.029.
10. Lansky AJ, Hochman JS, Ward PA, et al. Gender differences in ischemic outcomes following primary and rescue percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction: A report from the APEX-AMI trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(21):1838-1843. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.059.
11. Arora S, Stouffer GA, Kucharska-Newton AM, et al. Twenty year trends and sex differences in young adults hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: The ARIC community surveillance study. Circulation. 2019;139(8):1047-1056. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037137.
12. D'Ascenzo F, Gonella A, Quadri G, et al. Gender-related differences in clinical outcomes after primary angioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,555 patients. EuroIntervention. 2013;9(7):818-826. doi:10.4244/EIJV9I7A140.
13. Arora G, Strassle PD, Qamar A, et al. Trends in Sex Disparities, Outcomes, and Angiography Use for Invasive Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(8):881-891. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.039.
14. Maas AH, van der Schouw YT, Regitz-Zagrosek V, et al. Red alert for women's heart: The urgent need for more research and knowledge on cardiovascular disease in women: Proceedings of the European Society of Cardiology cardiovascular pharmacotherapy course 2018. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019;5(4):245-247. doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz017.
15. Whooley MA, De Jonge P, Vittinghoff E, et al. Depressive symptoms, health behaviors, and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease. JAMA. 2008;300(20):2379-2388. doi:10.1001/jama.2008.711.
16. McSweeney JC, Cody M, O’Sullivan P, et al. Women’s early warning symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003;108(21):2619-2623. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000097116.29625.7C.
17. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women—2011 update: A guideline from the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(12):1404-1423. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.005.
18. Kim ES, Carrigan TP, Menon V. Enrollment of women in National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–Funded cardiovascular randomized controlled trials fails to meet current federal mandates for inclusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(8):672-673. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.025.
19. Bucholz EM, Strait KM, Dreyer RP, et al. Socioeconomic status and sex differences in mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2014;130(24):2154-2162. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011241.
20. Melloni C, Berger JS, Wang TY, et al. Representation of women in randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular disease prevention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(2):135-142. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.868307.

Most read articles by the same author(s)