COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF GRASTON TECHNIQUE AND MYOFASCIAL RELEASE TECHNIQUE ON HAMSTRING FLEXIBILITY, PAIN AND LUMBAR ROM IN PATIENTS WITH NON-SPECIFIC CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN

Main Article Content

Osama Ramzan
Rabia Saeed
Hira Riaz
Dr. Rafia Imtiaz
Dr. Kanwal Fatima
Ahsan Taqweem
Ayesha Bashir
Dr. Anum Saleem
Dr. Intsam Aslam

Keywords

AKE, Flexibility, Graston Technique, Hamstring, Lumbar ROM, Myofascial Release, NSCLBP, VAS

Abstract

Background: Non-specific Chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is described as pain or discomfort in the lower back that originates from the waist to the inferior gluteal folds and lasts for at least three months with no radiculopathy or particular spinal disorders. Zygapophyseal joint pain, discogenic low back pain, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain & lumbar muscle strain are all clinical manifestations of NSCLBP.


Objectives: To evaluate the comparative effects of Graston technique and myofascial release on hamstring flexibility, lumbar pain and range of motion in patients with Non-specific chronic low back pain.


Methods: It was a randomized clinical trial where 42 male participants were included. Inclusion criteria included Participants with history of NSLBP for 3 or more months and having pain due to other pathology with exclusion criteria focusing on Participants enrolled in regular exercise or Yoga programs, having pain due to other pathology, Recent history (<3 months) of surgery and soft tissue injury. Group A received Graston technique on hamstring whereas the group B participants received therapist assisted compressive myofascial release. SPSS version 23.0 was used for the analysis of data, normality of data was assessed by Shapiro-wilks test. Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed ranked test was used for the within group analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for the between group analysis.


Results: 42 male participants (mean age 41.76 ± 6.60) underwent Graston technique or myofascial release technique. The within group analysis of SRT, AKE, VAS and lumbar ROM showed that both Graston technique and myofascial release technique has significantly improved (p<0.05) the hamstring flexibility, lumbar pain and range of motion. The between group analysis showed that Graston technique was statistically significant (p<0.05) as compared to myofascial release technique group in improving the hamstring flexibility, lumbar pain and ROM in patients of non-specific chronic low back pain.


Conclusion: The Graston technique and myofascial release technique produced significant improvements in the hamstring flexibility, lumbar pain and range of motion, but the results produced by Graston technique were more significant as compared to myofascial release group on patients of non-specific chronic low back pain.

Abstract 201 | Pdf Downloads 52

References

1. Shaffer W, Matz P, Baisden J, Fernand R. North American Spine Society. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for multidiscilinary spine care. 2013. 2016.
2. Citko A, Górski S, Marcinowicz L, Górska A. Sedentary lifestyle and nonspecific low back pain in medical personnel in North-East Poland. BioMed research international. 2018;2018.
3. Fasuyi FO, Fabunmi AA, Adegoke BOJJob, therapies m. Hamstring muscle length and pelvic tilt range among individuals with and without low back pain. 2017;21(2):246-50.
4. Singla S, Rajan Sharma D, Sharma R, Singh A, Dhillon AS, Satti SK. Comparison between clinical finding and magnetic resonance imaging finding of lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc. International Journal of Orthopaedics. 2020;6(4):670-4.
5. van der Made AD, Wieldraaijer T, Kerkhoffs G, Kleipool R, Engebretsen L, Van Dijk C, et al. The hamstring muscle complex. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015;23(7):2115-22.
6. Radwan A, Bigney KA, Buonomo HN, Jarmak MW, Moats SM, Ross JK, et al. Evaluation of intra-subject difference in hamstring flexibility in patients with low back pain: An exploratory study. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2015;28(1):61-6.
7. Muyor JM, Vaquero-Cristóbal R, Alacid F, López-Miñarro PA. Criterion-related validity of sit-and-reach and toe-touch tests as a measure of hamstring extensibility in athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2014;28(2):546-55.
8. Castellote-Caballero Y, Valenza MC, Puentedura EJ, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Alburquerque-Sendín F. Immediate effects of neurodynamic sliding versus muscle stretching on hamstring flexibility in subjects with short hamstring syndrome. Journal of sports medicine. 2014;2014.
9. Hammer WI. Graston 7.14. Fascia: The Tensional Network of the Human Body-E-Book: The science and clinical applications in manual and movement therapy. 2013:391.
10. Kim D-H, Ms T-HK, Jung D-Y, Weon J-H. Effects of the Graston Technique and Selfmyofascial Release on the Range of Motion of a Knee Joint. Journal of Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2014;9(4):455-63.
11. Kim J, Sung DJ, Lee J. Therapeutic effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for soft tissue injury: mechanisms and practical application. Journal of exercise rehabilitation. 2017;13(1):12.
12. Portillo-Soto A, Eberman LE, Demchak TJ, Peebles C. Comparison of blood flow changes with soft tissue mobilization and massage therapy. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2014;20(12):932-6.
13. Sandrey MA, Lancellotti C, Hester C. The Effect of Foam Rolling Versus IASTM on Knee Range of Motion, Fascial Displacement, and Patient Satisfaction. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2020;30(3):360-7.
14. Labodi KK. The effects of the Graston Technique® on cases of chronic tendinopathy measured by diagnostic ultrasound: North Dakota State University; 2018.
15. Wasserman JB, Abraham K, Massery M, Chu J, Farrow A, Marcoux BC. Soft tissue mobilization techniques are effective in treating chronic pain following cesarean section: a
multicenter randomized clinical trial. Journal of Women’s Health Physical Therapy. 2018;42(3):111-9.
16. Wong K-K, Chai H-M, Chen Y-J, Wang C-L, Shau Y-W, Wang S-F. Mechanical deformation of posterior thoracolumbar fascia after myofascial release in healthy men: A study of dynamic ultrasound imaging. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2017;27:124-30.
17. Ajimsha M, Al-Mudahka NR, Al-Madzhar J. Effectiveness of myofascial release: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies.
2015;19(1):102-12.
18. Arguisuelas M, Lison J, Domenech-Fernandez J, Martinez-Hurtado I, Coloma PS, SanchezZuriaga D. Effects of myofascial release in erector spinae myoelectric activity and lumbar spine kinematics in non-specific chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial. Clinical Biomechanics. 2019;63:27-33.
19. Bedekar N, Suryawanshi M, Rairikar S, Sancheti P, Shyam A. Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2014;27(2):161-6.
20. Laudner K, Compton BD, McLoda TA, Walters CM. Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization for improving posterior shoulder range of motion in collegiate baseball players. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2014;9(1):1.
21. Otadi K, Sarafraz H, Jalaie S, Rasouli O. Combining Patient Education With Dry Needling and Ischemic Compression for Treating Myofascial Trigger Points in Office Workers With Neck Pain: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Trial. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2020;19(4):222-9.
22. Behm DG, Wilke J. Do self-myofascial release devices release myofascia? Rolling mechanisms: a narrative review. Sports Medicine. 2019;49(8):1173-81.
23. Jung J, Choi W, Lee Y, Kim J, Kim H, Lee K, et al. Immediate effect of self-myofascial release on hamstring flexibility. Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science. 2017;6(1):45-51.

Most read articles by the same author(s)