HYPOSPADIAS REPAIR IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE: SURGICAL TECHNIQUES AND POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Hypospadias, TIP Urethroplasty, Mathieu Repair, Surgical Outcomes, Pediatric surgery, Postoperative Complications, Tertiary Care Center.
Abstract
Background: Hypospadias is a genital developmental abnormality that leads to the abnormally located meatus in male urethra and may need surgical intervention for good urinary and sexual health. Techniques applicable in hypospadias surgery are Tubularized Incised Plate (TIP) urethroplasty, Mathieu repair and two-stage repair depending with the location and severity of the injury.
Objective: This research was aimed to assess the results, complications, and patients’ satisfaction related to hypospadias surgery in a tertiary hospital.
Methods: This prospective study was carried out in the Department of Paediatric Surgery, Khalifa Gulnawaz Teaching Hospital, Bannu Medical College, Bannu, Pakistan from Jan, 2010 to June, 2010. These were 100 patients with hypospadias aged between 6 months and 12 years. Patient demographics, details of the operation performed, findings seen at the time of surgery and details of the immediate postoperative period were recorded and reviewed. Complications and functional and cosmetic outcome were evaluated at varying interval after the surgery through follow up visits.
Results: Among the hypospadias patients, majority (65%) had distal, 20% mid-shaft and 15% proximal. Among the surgeries, TIP urethroplasty was the most common, 70% of patients, while 20% underwent Mathieu and only 10% underwent two-stage repair. The overall post-operative complications rate was 16%, with fistulous formation in 8%, meatal stenosis in 5%, and residual chordee in 3%. The functional outcomes were good with overall normal urinary stream in 90 % of patient. Overall satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome of burn injuries was high in 92% of caregivers, and 85% of the patients presented for follow-up as observed.
Conclusion: This review emphasises surgical satisfaction with TIP urethroplasty as the primary approach in the repair of hypospadias, with minimal complications. However, fistula formation and lack of proper follow up compliantly show the directions for innovation in surgical and postoperative management.
References
2. Sunay M, Dadalı M, Karabulut A, Emir L, Erol D. Our 23-year experience in urethrocutaneous fistulas developing after hypospadias surgery. Urology. 2007;69(2):366-8.
3. Wood HM, Kay R, Angermeier KW, Ross JH. Timing of the presentation of urethrocutaneous fistulas after hypospadias repair in pediatric patients. The journal of Urology. 2008;180(4S):1753-6.
4. Johal NS, Nitkunan T, O'Malley K, Cuckow PM. The two-stage repair for severe primary hypospadias. European urology. 2006;50(2):366-71.
5. Dogra BB. One stage repair in Hypospadias by prepucial island flap technique. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2003;36(01):018-22.
6. Budic I, Slavkovic A, Simic D, Djordjevic V, Novakovic D. Penile block for postoperative analgesia of hypospadias repair in children: 10AP6-9. European Journal of Anaesthesiology| EJA. 2007;24:139.
7. Aslan AR, Yücebaş E, Tekin A, Şengör F, Kogan BA. Short-term catheterization after TIP repair in distal hypospadias: who are the best candidates? Pediatric surgery international. 2007;23:265-9.
8. Waterman BJ, Renschler T, Cartwright PC, Snow BW, de Vries CR. Variables in successful repair of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery. The Journal of urology. 2002;168(2):726-30.
9. Weber DM, Schönbucher VB, Landolt MA, Gobet R. The Pediatric Penile Perception Score: an instrument for patient self-assessment and surgeon evaluation after hypospadias repair. The Journal of urology. 2008;180(3):1080-4.
10. Bhat A, Mandal AK. Acute postoperative complications of hypospadias repair. Indian Journal of Urology. 2008;24(2):241-8.
11. Hoag CC, Gotto GT, Morrison KB, Coleman GU, MacNeily AE. Long-term functional outcome and satisfaction of patients with hypospadias repaired in childhood. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2008;2(1):23.
12. Nuininga JE, De Gier RP, Verschuren R, Feitz WF. Long-term outcome of different types of 1-stage hypospadias repair. The Journal of urology. 2005;174(4 Part 2):1544-8.
13. Liu G, Yuan J, Feng J, Geng J, Zhang W, Zhou X, et al. Factors affecting the long-term results of hypospadias repairs. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2006;41(3):554-9.
14. Ozturk H, Onen A, Otçu S, Kaya M, Ozturk H. The outcome of one-stage hypospadias repairs. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2005;1(4):261-6.