ANATOMY EDUCATION IN MEDICAL CURRICULA AND ITSEFFECT ON STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS: A SYSTEMATICREVIEW

Main Article Content

Sobia Haris
Muhammad Haris
Munir Khan
Farah Deeba
Zia Ud Din
Muhammad Sheheryar Khan
Muhammad Jehangir Khan

Keywords

Students, perception, medical education, anatomy, teaching methods, learning outcomes, student engagement.

Abstract

Background: Anatomy is a foundational subject in medical education, crucial for understanding the human body and developing clinical skills. With evolving educational needs, teaching methods in anatomy have shifted from traditional dissection to include modern technologies such as virtual and augmented reality. This systematic review examines students' perceptions of anatomy education in medical curricula, focusing on how teaching methodologies influence learning experiences.


 


Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2019 and 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies focusing on medical students’ perceptions of anatomy education in medical curricula using qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method approaches. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).


 


Results: Thirty-one studies were included, encompassing traditional teaching methods, technological innovations, and student-centered learning approaches. Traditional cadaveric dissection was highly valued for its immersive experience, while modern technologies like VR and AR were appreciated for enhancing visualization but were seen as supplementary. Student-centered methods such as PBL and flipped classrooms were positively perceived but highlighted the need for effective facilitation and feedback.


 


Conclusion: Understanding students' perceptions is crucial for optimizing anatomy curricula. A balanced approach that integrates traditional dissection with technological and student-centered innovations can enhance learning outcomes and satisfaction.

Abstract 59 | pdf Downloads 4

References

1. Smith CF, Mathias HS. Medical students’ approaches to learning anatomy: Students’ experiences and relations to the learning environment. Clin Anat. 2020;33(1):89-98. doi:10.1002/ca.23476
2. Winkelmann A, Hendrix S, Kiessling C, et al. Learning anatomy in an interactive 3D virtual world: The impact of a virtual dissection table on medical students’ learning. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(2):137-145. doi:10.1002/ase.1897
3. Pais D, Casal D, Mascarenhas-Lemos L, et al. Is cadaveric dissection crucial to learning anatomy? Perceptions of first-year medical students. Ann Anat. 2022; 238:151837. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151837
4. Nwachukwu C, Campbell B, Abiodun O, et al. A systematic review of student perceptions of dissection and dissection alternatives. J Surg Educ. 2021;78(6):1825-1835. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.05.009
5. Elizondo-Omaña RE, Guzmán-López S, García-Rodríguez MDL, et al. Traditional teaching supported by 3D anatomical models as a new tool for learning topographic anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2023;16(3):289-296. doi:10.1002/ase.2258
6. Khalil MK, Abdel Meguid EM, Elkhider IA. Teaching of anatomical sciences: A blended learning approach. Clin Anat. 2020;33(1):91-103. doi:10.1002/ca.23457
7. Shaffer JF, Louw G, Cilliers FJ. Enhanced learning outcomes in flipped classroom anatomy teaching. Med Educ. 2021;55(8):869-877. doi:10.1111/medu.14523
8. Yammine K, Violato C. A meta-analysis of the educational effectiveness of three-dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(1):43-54. doi:10.1002/ase.2016
9. Darras KE, Spouge R, Hatala R, et al. Integrated anatomy education in preclinical medical curricula: Current state of the field and future directions. Acad Med. 2022;97(3):376-384. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004323
10. Finn GM, Sawdon M, Griksaitis MJ. Student perception of anatomy teaching and learning methods: Reformed vs. traditional. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):358. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02799-5
11. Sugand K, Abrahams PH, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(1):71-79. doi:10.1002/ase.2036
12. Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022;104(1):55-60. doi:10.1308/rcsann.2021.0105
13. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42(7):779-787. doi:10.1007/s00276-020-02510-6
14. Keenan ID, Yakubovitch M, Lapkin S, et al. The perception of anatomy education and future careers: A national survey of medical students in the United Kingdom. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(3):335-344. doi:10.1002/ase.2147
15. Patel KM, Moxham BJ. Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change. Clin Anat. 2020;33(1):15-24. doi:10.1002/ca.23454
16. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do students prefer traditional or new technology-assisted anatomy learning? A comparative study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):195. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-02701-9
17. Johnson EO, Charchanti AV, Troupis TG. Modernization of an anatomy class: From conceptualization to implementation. A case for integrative multimodal teaching. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(5):631-640. doi:10.1002/ase.1943
18. Ghosh SK. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for teaching human anatomy: A review. Med Sci Educ. 2023;33(1):51-59. doi:10.1007/s40670-023-01667-2
19. Attardi SM, Choi S, Barnett J. Student perspectives of anatomy pedagogy: The impact of curriculum change. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(5):759-770. doi:10.1002/ase.2161
20. Cho MJ, Hwang Y, Kwon H, et al. Student perception of learning anatomy: A mixed-methods study of the value of different modalities. Clin Anat. 2021;34(6):844-852. doi:10.1002/ca.23714
21. Hanna TN, Shuaib W, Han T, et al. The future of anatomy education in medical schools: Enhancing knowledge retention through novel teaching methods. Clin Anat. 2020;33(2):231-240. doi:10.1002/ca.23459
22. Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, et al. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(6):628-636. doi:10.1002/ase.2118
23. McMenamin PG, McLachlan J, Wilson A. The role of 3D printed models in teaching anatomy: A meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2023;45(3):273-280. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2112231
24. Tam MD, Hart AR, Williams SR. Virtual and augmented reality in anatomy teaching: Student perceptions of an innovative teaching tool. Med Educ. 2021;55(2):188-195. doi:10.1111/medu.14252
25. Brown KM, Chou S, Leung YL. The impact of virtual reality on anatomy teaching: A mixed methods study. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(1):58-68. doi:10.1002/ase.2174
26. Waterston SW, Stewart IJ. Survey of clinicians’ attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students. Clin Anat. 2022;35(4):499-504. doi:10.1002/ca.23729
27. Moxham BJ, Pais D, Glover A, et al. Student-centered learning approaches in anatomy education: A comparative review. J Anat. 2021;239(1):1-10. doi:10.1111/joa.13468
28. Rahimian M, Mehregan H, Mohammadi A, et al. Evaluation of student-centered learning approaches in teaching gross anatomy: A systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):180. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04201-y
29. Williams JG, Durning SJ, Hemmer PA. Medical students’ perceptions of frequent formative assessment in an anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(4):385-392. doi:10.1002/ase.1902
30. Laakso M, Nevalainen M, Tuominen H, et al. Student perceptions of anatomy assessment: Impact on learning and performance. Med Teach. 2022;44(7):749-756. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2032640
31. Elizondo-Omaña RE, Guzmán-López S, García-Rodríguez MDL. Anatomy education: Students’ perceptions and the role of digital technology. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2023; 10:23821205231113502. doi:10.1177/23821205231113502