ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE PROFILES OF MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA IN CLINICAL ISOLATES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY FROM JINNAH POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL CENTRE, PAKISTAN
Main Article Content
Keywords
Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Antibiotic Resistance, Clinical Isolates, Retrospective Analysis
Abstract
Objective: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major pathogen causing hospital-acquired infections worldwide, with multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains posing a significant public health challenge. This study aimed to investigate the antibiotic resistance profiles of P. aeruginosa isolates from diverse clinical samples to guide effective treatment strategies.
Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted at the Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC), Karachi, Pakistan, from April to December 2021. P. aeruginosa isolates from various clinical specimens were analyzed along with demographic details. Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using standard microbiological techniques and the Vitek 2 system. Data analysis was carried out using R Studio.
Results: A total of 1066 P. aeruginosa isolates were identified, with the highest frequency (33%) in individuals under 20 years of age. The majority of isolates came from pus (47%) and urine (23%) samples. High resistance rates were observed for amikacin (77%), ceftizoxime (43%), and norfloxacin (40%). In contrast, cefoperazone-sulbactam exhibited the lowest resistance at 15%.
Conclusion: The findings emphasize the need for antibiotic susceptibility testing in managing P. aeruginosa infections. Although amikacin and tobramycin showed high sensitivity, increasing resistance trends for gentamicin and amikacin warrant careful antibiotic selection and monitoring. Treatment should be tailored based on local resistance data, as resistance patterns vary for antibiotics such as piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem. Regular surveillance of resistance trends is crucial to ensure effective treatment strategies.
References
2. Pachori, P., et al. (2019). Emergence of antibiotic resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care unit: A critical review. Genes & Diseases, 6(2), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2019.04.001
3. Langendonk, R. F., et al. (2021). The building blocks of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Implications for current resistance-breaking therapies. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 11, 665759. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.665759
4. El-Far, A., et al. (2021). High rates of aminoglycoside methyltransferases associated with metallo-beta-lactamases in multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from a tertiary care hospital in Egypt. Infection and Drug Resistance, 14, 4849-4858. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S332333
5. Terreni, M., Taccani, M., & Pregnolato, M. (2021). New antibiotics for multidrug-resistant bacterial strains: Latest research developments and future perspectives. Molecules, 26(9), 2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092671
6. Morris, S., & Cerceo, E. (2020). Trends, epidemiology, and management of multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacterial infections in the hospitalized setting. Antibiotics, 9(4), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9040196
7. Majumder, M. A., Rahman, S., Cohall, D., Bharatha, A., Singh, K., Haque, M., & Gittens-St Hilaire, M. (2020). Antimicrobial stewardship: Fighting antimicrobial resistance and protecting global public health. Infection and Drug Resistance, 13, 4713-4738. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S242852
8. Ahmad, I., Malak, H. A., & Abulreesh, H. H. (2021). Environmental antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: A potential threat to public health. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 27, 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2021.08.005
9. Salam, M. A., Al-Amin, M. Y., Salam, T. M., Pawar, J. S., Akhter, N., Rabaan, A. A., & Alqumber, M. A. (2023). Antimicrobial resistance: A growing serious threat for global public health. Healthcare, 11(13), 1946. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131946
10. Cheesman, M. J., et al. (2017). Developing new antimicrobial therapies: Are synergistic combinations of plant extracts/compounds with conventional antibiotics the solution? Pharmacognosy Reviews, 11(22), 57. https://doi.org/10.4103/phrev.phrev_21_17
11. Nnadozie, C. F., Kumari, S., & Bux, F. (2017). Status of pathogens, antibiotic resistance genes, and antibiotic residues in wastewater treatment systems. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 16(3), 491-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-017-9440-9
12. Magiorakos, A. P., Burns, K., Rodríguez Baño, J., Borg, M., Daikos, G., Dumpis, U., & Weber, J. T. (2017). Infection prevention and control measures and tools for the prevention of entry of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae into healthcare settings: Guidance from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 6, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-016-0160-1
13. Pisabarro, A. G., & de la Torre, D. P. R. (2020). Impact of access to medicines on public health: Problems associated with access, use, and abuse of antibiotics. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01465-9
14. Fenta, A., Dagnew, M., Eshetie, S., & Belachew, T. (2020). Bacterial profile, antibiotic susceptibility pattern and associated risk factors of urinary tract infection among clinically suspected children attending at Felege-Hiwot comprehensive and specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. A prospective study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 20, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05262-5
15. Almalki, M. A., & Varghese, R. (2020). Prevalence of catheter-associated biofilm-producing bacteria and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 32(2), 1427-1433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2019.11.008
16. Singh, I., Jaryal, S. C., Thakur, K., Sood, A., Grover, P. S., & Bareja, R. (2015). Isolation and characterization of various Pseudomonas species from distinct clinical specimens. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, 14, E80-E87.