EVALUATION OF ADAPTATION AND WEAR SIMULATION OF INNOVATIVE TOOTH-COLORED PRIMARY POSTERIOR CROWNS
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adaptation and wear simulation of innovative tooth-colored primary posterior crowns, specifically comparing ceramic (Zirconia) crowns and glass-reinforced fiber composite (FRC) crowns.
Material and methods: Fourteen posterior crowns from two manufacturers were used: Elephant Plus Zirconia crowns (Ceramic) and Figaro Glass-reinforced fiber composite crowns (FRC). Crowns were cemented to their respective master dies and the vertical marginal gaps were measured using a digital microscope and analyzed with Image J software. A wear simulation was performed utilizing a programmable logic controlled four-station multimodal ROBOTA chewing simulator, which included a thermocyclic protocol , simulating 3 months of clinical chewing conditions. Surface roughness was measured using optical profilometry and analyzed with WSxM software.
Results: The FRC group showed a significantly greater vertical marginal gap mean score (69.36 ± 8.84 µm) compared to the Ceramic group (26.44 ± 7.05 µm) (p < 0.0001). Surface roughness results indicated no significant difference between the groups before wear simulation, with the Ceramic group at 0.2496 ± 0.03 µm and the FRC group at 0.2395 ± 0.22 µm (P=0.494). After wear simulation, the roughness remained statistically non-significant between the Ceramic group (0.2609 ± 0.025 µm) and the FRC group (0.2533 ± 0.023 µm) (P=0.5667).
Conclusion: Ceramic crowns demonstrated superior marginal adaptation compared to FRC crowns, making them a preferable choice for scenarios requiring high precision. However, both materials exhibited similar wear resistance and surface roughness characteristics, indicating their viability for long-term restorative solutions in pediatric dentistry. Further research with larger sample sizes and long-term clinical trials is recommended to validate these findings.
References
2. Choi, Jae-Won, et al. "Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless-steel crowns." The journal of advanced prosthodontics 8.1 (2016): 43-52.
3. Salami, Anas, T. Walia, and R. Bashiri. "Comparison of parental satisfaction with three tooth-colored full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary incisors." Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 39.5 (2015): 423-428.
4. Holsinger, Daniel M., et al. "Clinical evaluation and parental satisfaction with pediatric zirconia anterior crowns." Pediatric dentistry 38.3 (2016): 192-197.
5. Hamrah, Mohammad Hassan, et al. "Evaluation of the Clinical, Child, and Parental Satisfaction with Zirconia Crowns in Maxillary Primary Incisors: A Systematic Review." International journal of dentistry 2021 (2021): 1-6.
6. Yıldırım, S., and Y. Ş. Uslu. "Effects of different pediatric drugs and toothbrushing on color change of restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry." Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 23.5 (2020): 610-618.
7. Chen, X. X., et al. "Clinical performance of rensin-bonded composite strip crowns in primary incisors." Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban= Journal of Peking University. Health sciences 52.5 (2020): 907-912.
8. Mohammadzadeh Z, Parisay I, Mehrabkhani M, Madani AS, Mazhari F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite crowns in pulp-treated primary molars: 12-month results. European Journal of Dentistry. 2016 Oct;10(04):522-8.
9. Freilich M, Meiers J, Duncan J, Goldberg A. Fiber‑reinforced Composites in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 2000 Jan.
10. Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Fracture resistance of short, randomly oriented, glass fiber-reinforced composite premolar crowns. Acta biomaterialia. 2007 Sep 1;3(5):779-84.
11. Nawafleh, Noor, et al. "Lithium disilicate restorations fatigue testing parameters: a systematic review." Journal of Prosthodontics 25.2 (2016): 116-126.
12. Abouelatta OB. 3D surface roughness measurement using a light sectioning vision system. InProceedings of the world congress on engineering 2010 Jun 30 (Vol. 1, pp. 698-703).
13. Giacomelli L, Derchi G, Frustaci A, Bruno O, Covani U, Barone A, De Santis D, Chiappelli F. Surface roughness of commercial composites after different polishing protocols: an analysis with atomic force microscopy. The open dentistry journal. 2010;4:191.
14. Horcas I, Fernández R, Gomez-Rodriguez JM, Colchero JW, Gómez-Herrero JW, Baro AM. WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Review of scientific instruments. 2007 Jan 1;78(1).
15. Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2007 Jan;18:155-63.
16. Fráter, Márk, et al. "Fracture resistance and marginal gap formation of post-core restorations: influence of different fiber-reinforced composites." Clinical Oral Investigations 24 (2020): 265-276.
17. Conrad, H. J., Seong, W. J., & Pesun, I. J. (2007). Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 98(5), 389-404.
18. Boitelle, P., Mawussi, B., Tapie, L., & Fromentin, O. (2014). A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. The Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 41(11), 853-874.
19. Hamza, T. A., & Ezzat, H. A. (2014). Effect of artificial accelerated aging on surface roughness and color stability of different ceramic restorations. Stomatological Disciplinary, 36(3), 168-177.
20. Al-Rabab'ah, M. A., Hammad, M. M., & Ibrahim, N. S. (2012). The effect of using two fiber post types on the marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 56(1), 33-38.
21. Karakoca Nemli, S., Karakoca, S., Bayindir, F., & Yarici, S. (2013). Surface roughness of different resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 21(4), 358-364.
22. Heintze, S. D., & Rousson, V. (2012). Surface roughness of dental materials using different finishing/polishing procedures: A meta-analysis. Dental Materials, 28(5), 432-444.