EVALUATION OF ADAPTATION AND WEAR SIMULATION OF INNOVATIVE TOOTH-COLORED PRIMARY POSTERIOR CROWNS

Main Article Content

Mahmoud El-Said Ahmed Abd El-Aziz
Mohamed Aboelkasme Wakwak
Yousef Hamed Abokhlifa
Alaa Nabil Abbas
Salam Mohamed EL Araby
Abdelhamid Abuelyazid Eissa
Mohamed Galal Aboelsoud
Ashraf Marawan El Azzazy
Waled Omar Ameen Kadour
Alaa N. Syam

Keywords

.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adaptation and wear simulation of innovative tooth-colored primary posterior crowns, specifically comparing ceramic (Zirconia) crowns and glass-reinforced fiber composite (FRC) crowns.


Material and methods: Fourteen posterior crowns from two manufacturers were used: Elephant Plus Zirconia crowns (Ceramic) and Figaro Glass-reinforced fiber composite crowns (FRC). Crowns were cemented to their respective master dies and the vertical marginal gaps were measured using a digital microscope and analyzed with Image J software. A wear simulation was performed utilizing a programmable logic controlled four-station multimodal ROBOTA chewing simulator, which included a thermocyclic protocol , simulating 3 months of clinical chewing conditions. Surface roughness was measured using optical profilometry and analyzed with WSxM software.


Results: The FRC group showed a significantly greater vertical marginal gap mean score (69.36 ± 8.84 µm) compared to the Ceramic group (26.44 ± 7.05 µm) (p < 0.0001). Surface roughness results indicated no significant difference between the groups before wear simulation, with the Ceramic group at 0.2496 ± 0.03 µm and the FRC group at 0.2395 ± 0.22 µm (P=0.494). After wear simulation, the roughness remained statistically non-significant between the Ceramic group (0.2609 ± 0.025 µm) and the FRC group (0.2533 ± 0.023 µm) (P=0.5667).


Conclusion: Ceramic crowns demonstrated superior marginal adaptation compared to FRC crowns, making them a preferable choice for scenarios requiring high precision. However, both materials exhibited similar wear resistance and surface roughness characteristics, indicating their viability for long-term restorative solutions in pediatric dentistry. Further research with larger sample sizes and long-term clinical trials is recommended to validate these findings.

Abstract 46 | PDF Downloads 7

References

1. Babaji, P., et al. "Different crowns used in pediatric dentistry." Crowns in Pediatric Dentistry, first ed., Jaypee The Health Sciences Publisher, India (2016): 21-124.
2. Choi, Jae-Won, et al. "Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless-steel crowns." The journal of advanced prosthodontics 8.1 (2016): 43-52.
3. Salami, Anas, T. Walia, and R. Bashiri. "Comparison of parental satisfaction with three tooth-colored full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary incisors." Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 39.5 (2015): 423-428.
4. Holsinger, Daniel M., et al. "Clinical evaluation and parental satisfaction with pediatric zirconia anterior crowns." Pediatric dentistry 38.3 (2016): 192-197.
5. Hamrah, Mohammad Hassan, et al. "Evaluation of the Clinical, Child, and Parental Satisfaction with Zirconia Crowns in Maxillary Primary Incisors: A Systematic Review." International journal of dentistry 2021 (2021): 1-6.
6. Yıldırım, S., and Y. Ş. Uslu. "Effects of different pediatric drugs and toothbrushing on color change of restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry." Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 23.5 (2020): 610-618.
7. Chen, X. X., et al. "Clinical performance of rensin-bonded composite strip crowns in primary incisors." Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban= Journal of Peking University. Health sciences 52.5 (2020): 907-912.
8. Mohammadzadeh Z, Parisay I, Mehrabkhani M, Madani AS, Mazhari F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite crowns in pulp-treated primary molars: 12-month results. European Journal of Dentistry. 2016 Oct;10(04):522-8.
9. Freilich M, Meiers J, Duncan J, Goldberg A. Fiber‑reinforced Composites in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 2000 Jan.
10. Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Fracture resistance of short, randomly oriented, glass fiber-reinforced composite premolar crowns. Acta biomaterialia. 2007 Sep 1;3(5):779-84.
11. Nawafleh, Noor, et al. "Lithium disilicate restorations fatigue testing parameters: a systematic review." Journal of Prosthodontics 25.2 (2016): 116-126.
12. Abouelatta OB. 3D surface roughness measurement using a light sectioning vision system. InProceedings of the world congress on engineering 2010 Jun 30 (Vol. 1, pp. 698-703).
13. Giacomelli L, Derchi G, Frustaci A, Bruno O, Covani U, Barone A, De Santis D, Chiappelli F. Surface roughness of commercial composites after different polishing protocols: an analysis with atomic force microscopy. The open dentistry journal. 2010;4:191.
14. Horcas I, Fernández R, Gomez-Rodriguez JM, Colchero JW, Gómez-Herrero JW, Baro AM. WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Review of scientific instruments. 2007 Jan 1;78(1).
15. Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2007 Jan;18:155-63.
16. Fráter, Márk, et al. "Fracture resistance and marginal gap formation of post-core restorations: influence of different fiber-reinforced composites." Clinical Oral Investigations 24 (2020): 265-276.
17. Conrad, H. J., Seong, W. J., & Pesun, I. J. (2007). Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 98(5), 389-404.
18. Boitelle, P., Mawussi, B., Tapie, L., & Fromentin, O. (2014). A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. The Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 41(11), 853-874.
19. Hamza, T. A., & Ezzat, H. A. (2014). Effect of artificial accelerated aging on surface roughness and color stability of different ceramic restorations. Stomatological Disciplinary, 36(3), 168-177.
20. Al-Rabab'ah, M. A., Hammad, M. M., & Ibrahim, N. S. (2012). The effect of using two fiber post types on the marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 56(1), 33-38.
21. Karakoca Nemli, S., Karakoca, S., Bayindir, F., & Yarici, S. (2013). Surface roughness of different resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 21(4), 358-364.
22. Heintze, S. D., & Rousson, V. (2012). Surface roughness of dental materials using different finishing/polishing procedures: A meta-analysis. Dental Materials, 28(5), 432-444.

Most read articles by the same author(s)