ASSESSING EGYPTIAN DENTISTS' KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE IN UTILIZING FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE RESIN SPACE MAINTAINERS: A QUESTIONNAIRE-BASED STUDY

Main Article Content

Ahmed Akram EL-Awady
Hamdy Mahmoud Badreldin Mohamed
Hosam Muhammed Elsayed
Ahmed Mohamed Nagiub
Mohamed Galal Aboelsoud
Abdelhamid Abuelyazid Eissa
Salam Mohamed EL Araby
Waled omar ameen kadour
Ahmed Shehata Mohamed Ammar
Elaf Jamal Fitaihi

Keywords

Interceptive orthodontics, Fiber-reinforced composite resin Space maintainer, Bonded space maintainer.

Abstract

Introduction: Utilization of fiber-reinforced composite resin space maintainers (FRCRSM) in orthodontics and pediatric dentistry holds significant potential for effective space management. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the knowledge, familiarity, frequency of usage, and perceived challenges related to FRCRSM among a sample of Egyptian orthodontists and pedodontists through a structured questionnaire survey. Subjects and methods: A questionnaire was designed and prepared, then evaluated for reliability and validity. A total sample of 200 participants, including Egyptian orthodontists and pedodontists, were asked to complete the questionnaire, and the final data were analyzed. Results: The survey responses from 200 participants unveiled varying levels of knowledge and utilization of FRCRSM among Egyptian orthodontists and pediatric dental practitioners. While 20 % demonstrated a comprehensive understanding and routinely incorporated FRCRSM in clinical settings, a substantial proportion of 80 % indicated limited exposure or knowledge gaps. Conclusion: The results of the current survey showed that a high percentage of orthodontic and pediatric dentistry practitioners didn't use the FRCSM as a space maintainer; this could be attributed to its technique sensitivity and reduced knowledge about this type of space maintainer.

Abstract 103 | PDF Downloads 71

References

1. Nadelman P, Magno MB, Pithon MM, CASTRO AC, Maia LC. Does the premature loss of primary anterior teeth cause morphological, functional and psychosocial consequences?. Brazilian oral research. 2021;35:1-11.
2. Barros SE, Siqueira SP, Janson G, Chiqueto K. Short-term efficacy of vacuum-formed maintainer for deciduous second molar space maintenance in the mixed dentition: A single-centre, randomized controlled clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24(4):502-10.
3. Turner S, Harrison JE, Sharif FN, Owens D, Millett DT. Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;12(12):CD003453.
4. Deshpande SS, Bendgude VD, Kokkali VV. Survival of bonded space maintainers: a systematic review. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 2018;11:440-45.
5. Karaiskos N, Wiltshire WA, Odlum O, Brothwell D, Hassard TH. Preventive and interceptive orthodontic treatment needs of an inner-city group of 6-and 9-year-old Canadian children. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. 2005 Oct 1;71(9).
6. Macena MC, Tornisiello Katz CR, Heimer MV, de Oliveira e Silva JF, Costa LB. Space changes after premature loss of deciduous molars among Brazilian children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(6):771-8.
7. Ahmad AJ, Parekh S, Ashley PF. Methods of space maintenance for premature loss of a primary molar: a review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(5):311-20.
8. Watt E, Ahmad A, Adamji R, Katsimpali A, Ashley P, Noar J. Space maintainers in the primary and mixed dentition - a clinical guide. Br Dent J. 2018;225(4):293-8.
9. Simsek S, Yilmaz Y, Gurbuz T. Clinical evaluation of simple fixed space maintainers bonded with flow composite resin. J Dent Child 2004 May-Aug;71(2):163-168.
10. Tuloglu N, Bayrak S, Tunc ES. Different clinical applications of bondable reinforcement ribbond in pediatric dentistry. European journal of dentistry. 2009 Oct;3(04)329-34.
11. Vitale MC, Caprioglio C, Martignone A, Marchesi U, Botticelli AR. Combined technique with polyethylene fibers and composite resins in restoration of traumatized anterior teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2004;20(3):172-7.
12. Ramakrishnan M, Dhanalakshmi R, Subramanian EMG. Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry - A systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2019;31(2):165-72.
13. Kulkarni G, Lau D, Hafezi S. Development and testing of fiber-reinforced composite space maintainers. Journal of Dentistry for Children. 2009 Dec 15;76(3)204-8.
14. Ganesh M, Tandon S. Versatility of ribbond in contemporary dental practice. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2006 Jul 1;20(1)53-8.
15. Mittal S, Sharma A, Sharma AK, Gupta KK, Gaur A, Pathania V. Banded versus Single-sided bonded space maintainers: A Comparative Study. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2018 ;10:29-36.
16. Potgieter N, Brandt PD, Mohamed N. Clinical evaluation of the loop-design fibre-reinforced composite and the band-and-loop space maintainers. South African Dental Journal. 2018;73(7):436-41.
17. Garg A, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Saha S. 'Metal to resin': a comparative evaluation of conventional band and loop space maintainer with the fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(2):111-6.
18. Kamal YM, Mohammed KN. Evaluation of posterior fixed functional space maintainers made of fiber reinforced composite. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2017;16(2):1-5.
19. Setia V, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Sekhon HK. Space maintainers in dentistry: past to present. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(10):2402-5.
20. El-Awady AA, Badreldin HM. Children’s satisfaction and survival rate of fiber-reinforced space maintainer versus band and loop space maintainer in children with premature loss of maxillary primary first molar. International journal of health sciences. 2021;6 :643-53.
21. Saravanakumar MS, Siddaramayya J, Sajjanar AB, Godhi BS, Reddy NS, Krishnam RP. Fiber Technology in Space Maintainer: A Clinical Follow-up Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(6):1070-75.

Most read articles by the same author(s)