NANOPRESERVED TOMATOES FOR IMPROVED POST HARVEST MANAGEMENT

Main Article Content

Praveen Mamidala
Alex Chaturvedi
Ebenezer Madam

Keywords

Chitosan, harpin, chitosan loaded nanoparticles, harpin nanoparticles, post-harvest management, tomato

Abstract

Postharvest management in tomato is crucial for global supply and also to maintain freshness and keeping them in a diseased-free stage for prolonged periods. Nanomaterials have become better choice to preserve the healthiness of the fruit by extending their shelf life and maintaining the pathogen free conditions. In the current study, we have developed harpin (hrp-encoded elicitor of the hypersensitive response) loaded chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) for improved post-harvest management in tomato. The newly synthesized harpin loaded CSNPs (CSHNPs) were characterized via UV-Vis Spectroscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), powder X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) confirming the nanoparticle nature of CSNPs and CSHNPs. Furthermore, topical application of CSNPs and CSHNPs on freshly harvested tomatoes revealed the significant increase in the levels of polyphenol oxidase (PPO), peroxidase (POD) and phenolic compounds. From the current studies, it is evident that CSNPs and CSHNPs can potentially help in controlling post-harvest storage problems in tomato and other fresh vegetable fruits.

Abstract 28 | pdf Downloads 11

References

1. Bautista-Banos, S., Hernandez-Lauzardo, A.N., Vel´azquez-del Valle, M.G., Hern´andez-L´opez, M., Ait Barka, E., Bosquez-Molina, E., Wilson, C.L., (2006). Chitosan as a potential natural compound to control pre and postharvest diseases of horticultural commodities. Crop Prot. 25, 108–118.
2. Benhamou, N., (1996). Elicitor-induced plant defence pathways. Trends Plant Sci. 1, 233–240.
3. Bradford MM, (1976).A Rapid and sensitive Method for Quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilisingthe principle of protein –dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254.
4. Calvo P, Remunan-Lopez C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ. (1997a), Novel hydrophilic chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanoprticles as protein carriers. J. Appl. Polymer Sci 63: 125-132
5. Calvo P, Remunan-Lopez C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ. (1997b), Chitosan and chitosan/ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer nanoparticles as novel carriers for proteins and vaccines. Pharm Res 14: 1431-1436.
6. Chen, C., Belanger, R., Benhamou, N., Paulitz, T.C. (2000). Defense enzymes induced in cucumber roots by treatment with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Pythium aphanidermatum. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 56, 13–23.
7. Fidantsef AL, Stout MJ, Thaler JS, Duffey SS & Bostock RM (1999). Signal interactions in pathogen and insect attack: expression of lipoxygenase, proteinase inhibitor II, and pathogenesis-related protein P4 in the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 54: 97–1 14.
8. Greenberg JT, Guo A, Klessig DF and Ausubel FM (1994). Programmed cell death in plant: a pathogen-triggered response activated coordinately with multiple defense functions. Cell; 77:551–63.
9. Hadrami AE, Adam LR, Hadrami IE, and Daayf F (2010). Chitosan in Plant Protection Mar. Drugs, 8, 968-987.
10. He, S. Y., Huang, H.-C. & Collmer, A. (1993). Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae harpinPss : a protein that is secreted via the Hrp pathway and elicits the hypersensitive response in plants. Cell 73, 1255-1266.
11. Ippolito, A., El Ghaouth, A., Wilson, C.L., Wisniewski, M., (2000). Control of postharvest decay of apple fruit by Aureobasidium pullulans and induction of defense responses. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 19, 265–272.
12. Janes KA, Fresneau MP, Marazuela A, Fabra A and Alonso MJ (2001). Chitosan nanoparticles as delivery systems fordoxorubicin ,Journal of Controlled Release, 73:2-3, 255-267
13. Janisiewicz, W.J., Korsten, L., (2002). Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 40: 411–441.
14. Khodakovskaya M V, de Silva K, BirisAS, Dervish E, Villagarcia H (2012) Carbon nanotubes induce growth enhancement of tobacco cells. ACS Nano 6:2128-2135.
15. Khodakovskaya M, Dervishi E, Mahmood M, Xu Y, Li Z, Watanabe F, Biris AS (2009) Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth. ACS Nano 3:3221-3227.
16. Lamb C and Dixon RA (1997). The oxidative burst in plant disease resistance. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol;48: 251–75.
17. Liu, H.X., Jiang, W.B., Bi, Y., Luo, Y.B., (2005). Postharvest BTH treatment induces resistance of peach (Prunus persica L. cv. Jiubao) fruit to infection by Penicillium expansum and enhances activity of fruit defense mechanisms. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 35, 263–269.
18. Mahmoodzadeh H, Nabavi M, Kashefi H (2013) Effect of nanoscale titanium dioxide particles on the germination and growth of canola (Brassica napus). J Ornamental and Horticultural Plants 3:25-32.
19. Mondal K and Mani C (2012) Investigation of the antibacterial properties of nano copper against Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. punicae, the incitant of pomegranate bacterial blight. Annals of Microbiology 62:889-893.
20. Pinto RJ, Almeida A, Fernandes SC, Freire CS, Silvestre AJ, Neto CP, Trindade T (2013) Antifungal activity of transparent nanocomposite thin films of pullulan and silver against Aspergillus niger. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces103:143-148.
21. Stout MJ, Workman KV, Workman JS, Duffey SS (1996) Temporal and ontogenetic aspects of protein induction in foliage of the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 611–625.
22. USEPA (2007) Framework for Determining a Mutagenic Mode of Action for Carcinogenicity. Review Draft. EPA 120/R-07/002-A.
23. Wei, Z.-M., Laby, R. J., Zumoff, C. H., Bauer, D. W., He, S. Y., Collmer, A., Beer, S. V. (1992). Harpin, elicitor of the hypersensitive response produced by the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora. Science 257, 85-88.