ANALYSIS TO EXPLORE THE PREVALENCE RATE OF POLIO IN KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PAKISTAN: CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES AND REMEDIES
Main Article Content
Keywords
A case-control study, Chi-square test, Odds Ratio, Logistic Regression, Cluster Analysis
Abstract
This study investigated the association of polio with demographic, social factors, and living conditions in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, focusing on patients in Peshawar. A case-control approach was employed, collecting data from 222 polio cases and 100 healthy controls, selected from relatives of patients. The analysis found a significantly higher incidence of polio among families with incomes below Rs. 20,000. Chi-square tests and odds ratios indicated that males are at higher risk for polio compared to females (Odds Ratio = 1.586). Individuals without proper sanitation facilities were also more susceptible to polio (Odds Ratio = 0.081). Logistic regression identified several key risk factors, including sources of information about polio, previous exposure to polio patients, dietary practices such as consuming hot food post-vaccination, duration of symptoms, and the effectiveness of polio vaccination in preventing other diseases. Resistance to receiving polio vaccinations and inadequate sanitation also emerged as significant factors. Furthermore, cluster analysis using the gap statistic, silhouette statistic, and elbow method revealed that three clusters best represent the data, providing robust insights and reinforcing the study’s findings. This comprehensive analysis highlights the importance of addressing socioeconomic and sanitation-related factors and suggests targeted strategies for effective polio eradication efforts. The results underscore the need for tailored public health interventions to combat polio effectively in Pakistan.
References
2. Aylward et.al, . (2011). The global polio eradication initiative lessons learned and prospects for success. vaccine., 29, 80-85.
3. Bland, et.al. (2000). The odds ratio. Bmj , 320(7247), 1468.
4. Franke et.al. (2012). The chi-square test: Often used and more often misinterpreted. . American journal of evaluation, , 33(3), 448-458.
5. Global Polio Eradication. (2018). initiative, WHO polio weekly global surveillance updata (2013-2018)[Internet]. Geneva: GPEI.
6. History of Polio. (2019). [https://polioeradication.org/polio-today/history-of-polio/]. polioeradication.org.
7. Kleinbaum, et.al. (2002). Logistic regression (p. 536). . New York: : Springer-Verlag.
8. Kraemer, et.al. (2004). Reconsidering the odds ratio as a measure of 2× 2 association in a population. Statistics in Medicine, 23(2), 257-270.
9. LaValley. (2008). Logistic regression. . Circulation, 117(18), 2395-2399.
10. Mehndiratta et.al. ( 2014). Historical Facts, Epidemiology, and Current Challenges in Eradication. The Neurohospitalist., 4(4), 223-229.
11. Mehndiratta et.al. (2014). Historical Facts, Epidemiology, and Current Challenges in Eradication. The Neurohospitalist. , 4(4), 223-229.
12. National Institute of Health, Pakistan. (2023). Polio eradication program. Retrieved from https://www.nih.org.pk/polio-eradication-program.
13. Rana,et.al. (2015). Chi-square test and its application in hypothesis testing. Journal of Primary Care Specialties,, 1(1), 69-71.
14. Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. . Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 20, 53-65.
15. Tebbensa et.al. (2010). Economic analysis of the global polio eradication initiative, . vaccine., 29, 334-343.
16. Tibshirani, R. W. (2001). Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 63(2), 411-423.
17. World Health Organization, & Global Polio Eradication Initiative. (2019). Polio endgame strategy 2019-2023: eradication, integration, certification and containment (No. WHO/Polio/19.04). World Health Organization.
18. Zimmermann et.al. (2019). Projection of Costs of Polio Eradication Compared to Permanent Control,. THe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1-5.