HISTOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS FOR CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL OF PESHAWAR AND ABBOTTABAD
Main Article Content
Keywords
variations, appendix, appendectomy, histopathology of appendix, demography.
Abstract
Objectives : This study aims to determine the anatomical variation of appendix and its histopathological findings in specimen after appendectomy
Material and methods: This was a cross sectional study with 350 sample size and specimen was examined during appendectomy. After appendectomy the sample was sent to laboratory for histopathological findings.
Results: It was a cross sectional descriptive study done in tertiary care hospitals of Peshawar and Abbottabad KPK. The sample size was 350 and age was from 10 to 60 years, means age was 28.78 years. Among 350 sample size 60% were male while 40% were female living in rural area 39% and 60.7% were living in urban area. The age was divided into five intervals patients from 10-20 years were visiting to hospital for appendectomy were 31% , 21-30 years were 36% , 31-40 years were 13% , 41-50 years were 9.1% while 51-60 years were 9.7%. The variation found was retrocecal 65.8% while 21.7% was pelvic, postileal 2.8%, 7.1% subcecal and 2.6% preileal. Patient were mostly Pushto speakers 68.1%, while minority were 4.8% and urdu speakers were 26%. The histopathological profile was 28.5% chronic supurative appendicitis, 19.4% were fecolith, 15.1% lymphoid, appendicular mass 3.4%, chronic granulomatous inflammation was 3.4% acute gangrenous appendices was 6.8% while fibroid was 6.8% and unusual findings were 6% in the study.
Conclusion: The study concluded that retrocecal position was most common variation and acute supurative appendicitis is the common histopathological finding in appendix.
References
2. Malhotra K, Bawa A (August 18, 2020) Routine Histopathological Evaluation After Appendectomy: Is It Necessary? A Systematic Review. Cureus 12(8): e9830. doi:10.7759/cureus.9830
3. Ahmed W, Akhtar MS, Khan S. Seasonal variation of acute appendicitis. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(3):564-567.
4. Khatun sanzida et al. Prevalence of Retrocaecal Appendix among Patients with Appendicitis in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Nepal. J Nepal Med Assoc 2019;57(217):150-153
5. Faisal L, Ajmal R, Rehman F, Islam ZU, Qayyum SA, Athar S. Anatomical Variations of Vermiform Appendix on Plain MDCT and ItsAssociation with Acute Appendicitis in Adult Urban Population of Karachi, A Tertiary Care Hospital Experience. J Bahria Uni MedDental Coll. 2022; 12(2):77-82.
6. Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, Boermeester M, Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Tarasconi A, De’Angelis N. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World journal of emergency surgery. 2020 Dec;15(1):1-42.
7. Afzal M, Al-Yahri O, Musthafa S, Ali SM, Ghali MS. Retro-Psoas Appendix: A Rare Atypical Position of the Appendix Tip Radiological Images and Review of Literature. European Journal of Applied Sciences–Vol. 2021 Dec 25;9(6).
8. Ahmad MA, Ali MT, Zarkoon NA, Khan NM. Variations in the Position and Length of the Vermiform Appendix in Pakistani Population. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2017 Jan 1;11(1):356-61.
9. Abdulrahman SA. Unusual findings in appendicectomy specimens: Local experience in Al-Ahsa region of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Clinical Pathology and Forensic Medicine. 2011 Jan 31;2(1):1-3.
10. S. C. Patel, G. F. Jumba, and S. Akmal, “Laparoscopic appendicectomy at the Aga Khan Hospital, Nairobi,” East African Medical Journal.2003;80(9):447–451.
11. Blomqvist PG, Andersson RE, Granath F, Lambe MP, Ekbom AR. Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996. Ann Surg 2001;233: 455-60.
12. Bickell NA, Aufses JAH, Rojas M, Bodian C. How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202: 401-6.
13. Zacharzewska-Gondek A, Szczurowska A, Guziñski M,S¹siadek M, Bladowska J. A pictorial essay of the most atypicalvariants of the vermiform appendix position in computedtomography with their possible clinical implications. Polishjournal of radiology. 2019;84:e1. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2018.81158
14. Iqbal T, Amanullah A, Nawaz R. Pattern and positions of vermiform appendix in people of Bannu district. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012 Jul 1;10(1).
15. Souza SC, Costa SR, Souza IG. Vermiform appendix: positions and length-a study of 377 cases and literature review. Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro). 2015 Oct;35:212-6.
16. Tofighi H, Taghadosi-Nejad F, Abbaspour A, Behnoush B, Salimi A, Dabiran S, Ghorbani A, Okazi A. The anatomical position of appendix in Iranian cadavers. International journal of medical toxicology and forensic medicine. 2013 Dec 2;3(4):126-30.
17. Kadi M, Nasr A, Shabkah AA, Alnahari R, Alhawi A, Alyamani R, Saleem AM. Histopathological examination of cases with acute appendicitis, A retrospective study at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Aug 19;81:104401.
18. Khan A Zubair, hayat Muhammad Khizar et al.Histopathological findings of appendicectomy specimens at a tertiary care hospital in Peshawar; A two-year retrospective study.Rawal Medical Journal: Vol. 47, No. 2, Apr-Jun 2022.
19. Mehmood nadir, Mushtaq huma and Alam saeed.Histopathological Analysis of Cases Presenting with Acute Appendicitis. Journal of Islamabad Medical & Dental College (JIMDC); 2014:3(1):11-14
20. J. E. Skandalakis and G. L. Colborn, Skandalakis’ Surgical Anatomy: The Embryologic and Anatomic Basis of Modern Surgery, vol. 2, PMP, Athens, Greece, 2004.