DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ORAL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS MEDICINE IN TREATMENT OF SPONTANEOUS BACTERIAL PERITONITIS

Main Article Content

Sayyeda Aisha Bahar
Aqsa Amjad
Adil Jan
Asif Wakil
Saad Manan
Adil Shah
Roohi Saleh

Keywords

Systematic & individual, IV therapy

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) is a life-threatening infection in cirrhotics that necessitates prompt antibiotic use. The primary goal of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of oral and IV antibiotics in SBP.


Objectives: We sought to compare oral versus intravenous antibiotic therapy in the treatment of SBP concerning efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness from a Retrospective cohort study


Study design: Retrospective cohort study


Place and Duration of Study: A tertiary care Hospital in Peshawar from Jan 2023 to Jan 2024


Methods: A Retrospective Cohort Study was performed at Tertiary Care Hospital Peshawar, including all patients who were diagnosed with SBP between January 2023 and January 2024. All patients were divided into two groups according to the antibiotics used: Group A -oral antibiotics and ciprofloxacin/cotrimoxazole with norfloxacin (patient 44); Group B- who needs I.V.I.V.I.V., cephalosporines, or ampicillin (patients). Patients were considered for inclusion if they were 18 years or older. They had a diagnosed hospital-acquired SBP based on an ascitic PMN cell count ≥250 cells/mm³ with positive bacterial cultures. Exclusion criteria were secondary peritonitis and severe co-morbid conditions necessitating non-study antibiotic treatment.


Results: In the oral metronidazole group (Group B), there was an 85% resolution rate, and in-hospital Mortality and duration of hospital stay were found to be a maximum of 10% and 7 ±3 days, respectively. Group B had a 90% resolution rate, and the general mortality rate was about 8 %, requiring hospitalization of only ten (±4) days. Group A 15% recurrences Group B 12% recurrences


Conclusion: If treated orally for SBP, oral antibiotics are no different statistically than IV regarding Mortality or LOS in the hospital. The demonstrated results support the introduction of oral treatment in those eligible to enhance adherence and decrease cost.

Abstract 275 | PDF Downloads 126

References

1. Runyon BA. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: update 2012. Hepatology. 2013;57(4):1651-1653.
2. Beldowicz M, Moryl A, Zierhut W, et al. Oral antibiotic therapy in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2020;2020:3954623.
3. Fernández J, Mensa J, Sánchez E, et al. Comparative efficacy of oral versus intravenous antibiotics for treating spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: A meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2019;69(3):989-1000.
4. Gines P, Quintero E, Arroyo V, et al. Management of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a systematic review. Liver International. 2021;41(6):1345-1355.
5. Salerno F, Gerbes A, Gines P, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a European perspective. Journal of Hepatology. 2007;46(3):477-489.
6. Wong F, Bernardi M, Balk R, et al. The role of intravenous antibiotic therapy in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: an update. Liver International. 2013;33(6):892-899.
7. Kurioka H, Ikeda M, Hiyama T, et al. Oral versus intravenous antibiotic therapy for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: A randomized controlled trial. Hepatology Research. 2018;48(7):688-695.
8. Garcia-Tsao G, Parikh CR, Viola A. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):115-130.
9. Montoliu C, Fernández J, González A, et al. Use of oral antibiotics in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a review. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2019;64(8):2080-2090.
10. Iwakiri K, Kim K, Aithal GP, et al. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: evaluation of treatment protocols. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2020;26(20):2830-2840.
11. Rimola A, García-Tsao G, Gines P, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a consensus document. Journal of Hepatology. 2000;32(1):142-153.
12. Tandon P, García-Tsao G. Prognostic indicators in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. In: Gut. 2014;63(2):166-174.
13. De Franchis R, the Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop. Journal of Hepatology. 2015;63(1):743-752.
14. Verbeek PR, Dufour JF, Riedl RM, et al. Oral antibiotics for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2021;19(2):325-332.
15. Louie JZ, Satapathy SK, McLeod D, et al. Comparison of oral and intravenous antibiotics in managing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: A pilot study. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2019;53(1):33-39.
16. Reddick T, Al Abbas A, Cikovic T, et al. Oral versus intravenous antibiotics for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: A clinical trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2022;74(5):740-747.

Most read articles by the same author(s)