EFFECTS OF INSTRUMENT-ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION (IASTM) ON TRIGGER POINTS OF THE CERVICAL AND LUMBAR REGION AMONG SEDENTARY INDIVIDUALS

Main Article Content

Mohabbat Ali
Basit Ansari
Nazish Rafique
Asim Mahmood

Keywords

IASTM, Trigger Points, cervical pain, lumbar pain, soft tissue mobilization, myofascial release.

Abstract

Background:

Myofascial pain is defined as a musculoskeletal condition that causes discomfort in both the muscular region of the body and the surrounding connective tissue. This discomfort might be confined to a specific point or extend across a wider area, and it can also exhibit itself through several trigger points.


This study explores how Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) impacts trigger points in the cervical and lower back of sedentary adults, particularly focusing on myofascial pain, which affects women more than men and can lead to musculoskeletal pain. Considering the effect of these trigger points, the research compared the effectiveness of combining IASTM with physical therapy against using conventional physical therapy alone.


Methodology

A randomized controlled trial study conducted at a Memon Medical Institute Hospital, Karachi-Pakistan. The research included patients both male and female between the age of 18 and 55 years who were experiencing cervical and lumbar region pain caused by active trigger points.  The treatment group received myofascial release treatment using the IASTM technique with the M2T Blade along with conventional physical therapy. Standard data collection tools and techniques were employed.


Result

Findings indicated that IASTM, when combined with targeted exercises and conventional therapy, significantly reduced trigger points and improved symptoms in cervical and lumbar regions. These results were confirmed by statistical analyses performed using SPSS version 23, demonstrating the higher efficacy of IASTM over traditional therapy alone.


Conclusion

Treatment with IASTM (M2T Blade) was found to be more effective in reducing myofascial trigger points and discomfort in the cervical and lumbar regions than conventional therapy alone.

Abstract 172 | PDF Downloads 60

References

1. Giamberardino MA,AG,FA,CR. Myofascial pain syndromes and their evaluation.. Best practice & research Clinical rheumatology. 2011; 25(2): 185-198.
2. Kankaanpää M TSAOHO. The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain: effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability, and lumbar fatigability. Spine. 1999 May; 15;24(10): 1034-42
3. Aker PD GAGCPP. Conservative management of mechanical neck pain: systematic overview and meta-analysis. Bmj.. 1996 Nov ;(7068): 23;313.
4. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C SDCMPJ. The role of myofascial trigger points in musculoskeletal pain syndromes of the head and neck. Current pain and headache reports. 2007 Oct; 11: 365-72
5. Osailan A JATKAM. Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) versus stretching: A comparison in effectiveness on hip active range of motion, muscle torque and power in people with hamstring tightness.. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies. 2021 Jul ; 200(6)
6. Nourbakhsh MR AA. Relationship between mechanical factors and incidence of low back pain.. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2002 Sep; 32(9): 447-60
7. Cheatham SW BRKE. Instrument assisted soft-tissue mobilization: a commentary on clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation professionals. International journal of sports physical therapy.. 2019 Jul; 670(4): 14.
8. H. H. Hemodynamic Effects of Graston Technique on Trigger Points in the Upper Trapezius in Patients with Neck Pain.. Illinois State University. 2020
9. Fousekis K EKTEGPMKAPKDBVTE. Can the application of the Ergon® IASTM treatment on remote parts of the superficial back myofascial line be equally effective with the local application for the improvement of the hamstrings’ flexibility? Journal of physical therapy science.. 2019; 31(7): 508-11
10. Gamboa AJ CDMJFTMR. Functional movement analysis before and after instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization.. International journal of exercise science.. 2019; 12(3): 46
11. Nightingale RW RWMB. The effects of padded surfaces on the risk for cervical spine injury.. Spine. 1997 Oct ; 15;22(20): 2380-7
12. Nightingale RW CDAARJMB. Inertial properties and loading rates affect buckling modes and injury mechanisms in the cervical spine.. Journal of biomechanics.. 2000 Feb; 1;33(2): 191-7
13. Rukhin A SJNJSMBELSLMVMBDHADJ. A statistical test suite for random and pseudorandom number generators for cryptographic applications.. US Department of Commerce. Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2001 May 15.
14. Jemmett RS MDAA. Anatomical relationships between selected segmental muscles of the lumbar spine in the context of multi-planar segmental motion: a preliminary investigation.. Manual therapy.. 2004 Nov; 9(4): 203-10
15. Portillo-Soto A ELDTPC. Comparison of blood flow changes with soft tissue mobilization and massage therapy.. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine.. 2014 Dec 1; 20(12): 932-6.
16. Philadelphia Panel Members CSEAJARBRCADBGAHSRRSP. Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation intervenions for low back pain. Physical therapy. 2001 Oct ; 1641-74.(10): 1;81
17. Roddey TS OSGS. The effect of pectoralis muscle stretching on the resting position of the scapula in persons with varying degrees of forward head/rounded shoulder posture.. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy.. 2002 Jul; 1;10(3): 124-8.
18. Martin BI DRMSTJCBHWSS. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. Jama. 2008 Feb; 13;299(6): 656-64.
19. Jette AM SKHSDK. Physical therapy episodes of care for patients with low back pain.. Physical therapy.. 1994 Feb; 1;74(2): 101-10
20. Seffrin CB CNRMGSA. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization: a systematic review and effect-size analysis.. Journal of athletic training. 2019 Jul ; 1;54(7): 808-21.

Most read articles by the same author(s)