CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN MORBIDLY OBESE PATIENTS; A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Main Article Content

Zahir Khan
Anwar Imran
Farhan Qazi
Sajid Akhtar
Alamgir Khan
Bashir Khan

Keywords

Total Knee Arthroplasty, Morbidly Obese Patients, Patients ‘Clinical Outcome, Patients Functional Outcome

Abstract

Objective:  To evaluate the results of primary TKA in morbidly obese patients according to the clinical and functional parameters.


Study Design: A cross sectional study


Place and Duration of Study: Department of Orthopedic Mardan Medical Complex Mardan from Jan 2021 to July 2021


Methodology: A cross sectional study conducted at the department of orthopedic in MMC Mardan. Particularly the study involved morbidly obese patients, that is, the patients with body mass index (BMI) of 40 kilograms per meter square or higher undergoing primary TKA. Pre- and two-year follow-up AKSS were collected and compared using an independent t test to indicate the level of statistical significance (p < 0. 05).


Results:  out Of 200 patients, incisions were made for a total of two surgeries, and 180 (90. 2%) of them had bilateral TKA, and 10 (5. 2%) had unilateral TKA. As shown by the results, the mean age of the participants of the study was equal to 61. 01 ± 7. This is followed by 01 years involving 176 female patients and only 20 male patients with 81 . Most (62. 2%, n = 124) were categorized within the moderately obese to obese range with a BMI of between 38 and 48 . They were divided into three groups; 120 (59. ); 57 (28. ); and 80 (39. The clinical AKSS (Pain, Stability and ROM) at one year follow-up confirmed the results of the study and all the patients has significant improvement (p < 0. 05) where as the functional AKSS (Walking distance, Stair climbing and descending) as evaluated by the functional AKSS did not had significant improvement (p > 0. 05).


Conclusion: In morbidly obese patients primary TKA, the results showed an improved clinical status in both pain, stability, and range of motion but did not impact functional status as measured by distance walking and stair climbing.

Abstract 57 | PDF Downloads 16

References

1. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(1):57-63. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9
2. Jiang L, Tian W, Wang Y, et al. Body mass index and susceptibility to knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Joint Bone Spine. 2012;79(3):291-297. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.05.015
3. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894, 1-253. PMID: 11234459.
4. Grotle M, Hagen KB, Natvig B, Dahl FA, Kvien TK. Obesity and osteoarthritis in knee, hip and/or hand: an epidemiological study in the general population with 10 years follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:132. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-132
5. Foroughi M, Daryoush S, Majid M. The effect of obesity on outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2018;10(2):56-62. doi:10.15171/jcvtr.2018.10
6. Karam MD, Thomas GW, Waters PM, et al. American Knee Society Score: minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7S). doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.070
7. Ekegren CL, Beck B, Climie RE, et al. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of clinical tests measuring femoral and tibial component rotation following total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):146. doi:10.1186/s12891-018-2057-4
8. Williamson E, White L, Rushton A. A survey of UK physiotherapists’ treatment practices for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(1):82-88. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2016.03.336
9. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):57-63. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9
10. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894, 1-253. PMID: 11234459.
11. Podsiadlo P, Zając M, Dziedzic M, Nessler J. Morbid obesity: a serious health problem and a challenge for anesthesiologists. Anestezjol Intens Ter. 2018;50(2):135-141. doi:10.5603/AIT.a2018.0017
12. Williams A, Kind P. The present state of play about QALYs and their value. Health Econ Policy Law. 2017;12(2):249-265. doi:10.1017/S1744133116000458
13. Blevins JL, Kim JS, Bachus KN. Functional requirements for distal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(8):1182-1190. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.07.023
14. Karam MD, Thomas GW, Waters PM, et al. American Knee Society Score: minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7S) doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.070
15. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780-785. doi:10.2106/00004623-200704000-00012
16. Panahi M, Abbasi H, Akbari H. The effect of obesity on outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021; 145:204-212.e2. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.146
17. Kerkhoffs GM, Servien E, Dunn W, et al. The influence of obesity on the complication rate and outcome of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(20):1839-1844. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00820
18. Riihimäki M, Hietaharju A, Tuomilehto H, et al. Obesity and physical inactivity are related to impaired physical health of knee osteoarthritis patients with worse knee pain but not moderate pain. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017;25(3):394-400. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2016.09.013
19. Delincé P, Ghafil D. Anterior knee pain in the active young patient following total knee arthroplasty. Open Orthop J. 2017;11:1384-1396. doi:10.2174/1874325001711011384
20. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-14. PMID: 2805470.
21. Singh JA, Gabriel S, Lewallen D. The impact of gender, age, and preoperative pain severity on pain after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11):2717-2723. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0419-0
22. Ghomrawi HM, Lee LY, Zeni JA Jr, et al. Does higher body mass index increase the risk for prosthetic wear of the articulating surface in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(1):49-55. doi:10.1007/s11999.0
23. O'Malley NT, Fleming FJ, Gunzler DD, et al. Factors independently associated with complications and length of stay after hip arthroplasty: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(10):1832-1837.e1. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.007
24. Judge A, Arden NK, Batra RN, et al. The association of patient characteristics and surgical variables on symptoms of pain and function over 5 years following primary hip-replacement surgery: a prospective cohort study of 1217 patients. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(12):1586-1592. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.BJJ-2016-0320.R2
25. Karam MD, Thomas GW, Waters PM, et al. American Knee Society Score: minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7S) doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.070
26. Chen AF, Klatt BA, Yoo JY, et al. Impact of patient demographics, implant choice, and surgical technique on TKA patient-reported outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(2):362-366. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.023