DRUG-COATED BALLOONS (DCB) FOR THE TREATMENT OF IN-STENT RESTENOSIS (ISR) IN POST-PCI PATIENTS: A SHORT-TERM CLINICAL OUTCOMES STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
In-stent restenosis-ISR, drug-coated balloon-DCB, Coronary artery disease-CAD.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the short-term clinical outcomes of treating in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients who have had PCI at monthly and three-month follow-ups using drug-coated balloons (DCB).
Methodology: This prospective observational study, conducted at Department of Interventional Cardiology AFIC/ NIHD Rawalpindi, Pakistan from January, 2023 to January, 2024 involved 121 patients. Participants were selected using consecutive sampling, including adults treated with a paclitaxel-coated balloon, presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or worsening angina, and showing angiographic luminal narrowing of 50% or more in the diameter of a pre-deployed stent or within 4-5 mm of the stent. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Data collection involved a structured questionnaire covering baseline clinical variables, procedural information (ISR type, target vessel, therapies, complications, outcomes), and angiographic data (lesion diameter, TIMI flow grade). SPSS version 20.0 was used for data analysis. The Chi-square test (p < 0.05) was used to determine significance. Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± SD, while categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages.
Results: The study included 121 patients (mean age 56± 8.45years, 62% male) with a mean BMI of 27.5±4.2 kg/m². Comorbidities included diabetes (25%), hypertension (45%), dyslipidemia (41%), chronic kidney disease (12%), and heart failure (8%). Smoking was reported in 33% of patients. Indications for the procedure were unstable angina (37%), NSTEMI (41%), and STEMI (22%). The mean ISR luminal diameter was 75±10%, with 81% involving DES and 19% BMS. Target vessels were the left anterior descending artery (41%), right coronary artery (33%), and left circumflex artery (26%). Tirofiban was administered peri-procedurally to 53% of patients, and post-procedural DAPT with clopidogrel to 75% and ticagrelor to 24%. At the one-month follow-up, MACE included target vessel revascularization (4.1%), myocardial infarction (2.5%), stroke (1.6%), and death (0.8%). At three months, target vessel revascularization was 2.5%, myocardial infarction 1.6%, stroke 0.8%, and death 0.8%. There were no discernible variations in the clinical results across the one-month and three-month follow-ups (p > 0.05). Angiographic analysis showed improvement in TIMI flow grade from 1.5±0.5 to 3.0±0.2 post-intervention.
Conclusion: At the 1-month and 3-month follow-ups, the overall mortality rate stayed low at 0.8%, while the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) dropped from 8.2% at the 1-month mark to 4.9% at the 3-month mark. Based on these findings, DCBs appear to be a safe and effective therapeutic option for ISR.
References
2. Jafar, T. H., Jafary, F. H., Jessani, S., & Chaturvedi, N. (2005). Heart disease epidemic in Pakistan: women and men at equal risk. American heart journal, 150(2), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.09.025
3. Abubakar, M., Javed, I., Rasool, H. F., Raza, S., Basavaraju, D., Abdullah, R. M., Ahmed, F., Salim, S. S., Faraz, M. A., Hassan, K. M., & Hajjaj, M. (2023). Advancements in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Mixed Studies and Practice Guidelines. Cureus, 15(7), e41311. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41311
4. Her, A. Y., Shin, E. S., Bang, L. H., Nuruddin, A. A., Tang, Q., Hsieh, I. C., Hsu, J. C., Kiam, O. T., Qiu, C., Qian, J., Ahmad, W. A. W., & Ali, R. M. (2021). Drug-coated balloon treatment in coronary artery disease: Recommendations from an Asia-Pacific Consensus Group. Cardiology journal, 28(1), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2019.0093
5. Yang Y. X., Liu Y., Li C. P., Lu P. J., Wang J., Gao J. Clinical outcomes of drug-eluting versus bare-metal in-stent restenosis after the treatment of drug-eluting stent or drug-eluting balloon: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Interventional Cardiology . 2020;2020:11. doi: 10.1155/2020/8179849.8179849
6. Alfonso, F., Pérez-Vizcayno, M. J., Cárdenas, A., García Del Blanco, B., Seidelberger, B., Iñiguez, A., Gómez-Recio, M., Masotti, M., Velázquez, M. T., Sanchís, J., García-Touchard, A., Zueco, J., Bethencourt, A., Melgares, R., Cequier, A., Dominguez, A., Mainar, V., López-Mínguez, J. R., Moreu, J., Martí, V., … RIBS V Study Investigators, under the auspices of the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2014). A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS V Clinical Trial (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-eluting stent). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 63(14), 1378–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.006
7. Alraies, M. C., Darmoch, F., Tummala, R., & Waksman, R. (2017). Diagnosis and management challenges of in-stent restenosis in coronary arteries. World journal of cardiology, 9(8), 640–651. https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i8.640
8. Pleva, L., Kukla, P., & Hlinomaz, O. (2018). Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 15(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.02.007
9. Paramasivam, G., Devasia, T., Jayaram, A., U K, A. R., Rao, M. S., Vijayvergiya, R., & Nayak, K. (2020). In-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: Clinical presentation, angiographic features, and outcomes. Anatolian journal of cardiology, 23(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.72916
10. Giacoppo, D., Mazzone, P. M., & Capodanno, D. (2024). Current Management of In-Stent Restenosis. Journal of clinical medicine, 13(8), 2377. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082377
11. Wang, G., Zhao, Q., Chen, Q., Zhang, X., Tian, L., & Zhang, X. (2019). Comparison of drug-eluting balloon with repeat drug-eluting stent for recurrent drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis. Coronary artery disease, 30(7), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000784
12. Liu, W., Zhang, M., Chen, G., Li, Z., & Wei, F. (2020). Drug-Coated Balloon for De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions: A Systematic Review and Trial Sequential Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2020, 4158363. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4158363
13. Kumar, R., Shah, J. A., Solangi, B. A., Ammar, A., Kumar, M., Khan, N., Sial, J. A., Saghir, T., Qamar, N., & Karim, M. (2022). The Burden of Short-term Major Adverse Cardiac Events and its Determinants after Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Association, 34(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1302
14. Ullah R, Ali A, Malik F, Ahmed S, Khubaib S, Siddiqui FA. Treatment and Outcome of In-Stent Restenosis with Drug-Eluting Balloons; A Real-Life Single-Centre Study. APMC 2023;17(1):112-115. DOI: 10.29054/APMC/2023.1287
15. Murnaghan K, Bishop H, Sandila N, Kidwai B, Title L, Quraishi AUR, et al. Incidence and Predictors of Outcome in the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis with Drug-Eluting Balloons, a Real-Life Single-Centre Study. J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Aug 29;2022:1395980
16. Basavarajaiah S, Naganuma T, Latib A, Sticchi A, Ciconte G, Panoulas V, et al. Treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis: Comparison between drug-eluting balloon versus secondgeneration drug-eluting stents from a retrospective observational study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct;88(4):522-528
17. Patil, S., Rojulpote, C., Frick, W., Bhattaru, A., Sandhu, K., Bakhshi, A., Shahzad, A., Pressman, G., Chamoun, A., Verma, D., & Lin, C. J. (2024). Gender, racial and ethnic disparities in acute coronary syndromes with coronary in-stent restenosis. American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 43, 100405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100405