COST SAVINGS AND EFFECTIVENESS OF OUTPATIENT TREATMENT WITH LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN OF DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS IN A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Keywords
Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH), Tinzaparin Home care, Cost savings
Abstract
This study was conducted at Centenary Health Centre of the Rouge Valley Health System, a community based hospital in Toronto. In January 1997, a new treatment was introduced for the management of patients with uncomplicated deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Eligible patients presenting at the ER were placed on LMWH (tinzaparin) and followed at home. Previously the patients had been hospitalized and treated with intravenous heparin until they reached a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR). The intent of this study was to evaluate the patient outcomes and cost-savings of the new approach.
Methods
Data from all patients eligible for home care, treated in 1996 were assembled and compared with those from all eligible patients treated from April 1, 1997 to March 31, 1998. The data was collected by chart review and consisted of patient outcomes and costs during the period of heparin treatment. Costs for hospitalized patients were based on a per diem. For home care patients, the costs were itemized according to service and medication usage. All costs were calculated in 1999 Canadian dollars.
Results
In each one year period, 39 cases were treated. There was no serious adversity and the outcomes were compatible with what has been reported in the literature. The mean cost per patient for the 1996 hospitalized cohort was $3,266 compared to $584 for the subsequent home care cohort. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.00001).
Conclusion
Home care with tinzaparin compared to hospital care with IV heparin resulted in a large mean saving per patient with no difference in outcome.
References
2. A. Koopman MM, Prandoni P, Piovell F, et al. Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin administered at home. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 682-7.
3. Rose P, Bell D, Green ES, et al. The outcome of ambulatory DVT management using a multidisciplinary approach. Clinical & Laboratory Haematology 2001; 23:301-6.
4. Tillman DJ, Charland SL, and Witt DM. Effectiveness and economic impact associated with a program for outpatient management of acute deep vein thrombosis in a group model health maintenance organization. Arch Int Med 2000; 160: 2926-32.
5. Hyers TM, Hull RD, Weg JG. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest 1995; 4 (Suppl): 335s-51s.
6. Hull RD, Pineo GF. Low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Sem Resp Critical Care Med 1996; 17070.
7. Hyers TM, Agnelli G, Hull RD, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest 1998; 114: 561s- 78s.