A cross-sectional diagnostic study comparing the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography and chest radiography in detecting pneumothorax and hemothorax in patients with chest trauma
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
After head trauma and abdominal injuries, thoracic trauma makes up 20–25% of all traumas and is the third most common cause of death. Moving an unstable patient to the X-ray room in the Emergency Department (ED) is always dangerous to detect pneumothorax and hemothorax. Bedside X-rays expose nearby patients to radiation as well as the patient in question. When chest trauma patients are first imaged, bedside ultrasonography (USG) can help prevent this.
Objective
To assess the efficacy and precision of chest radiography and ultrasonography in identifying hemothorax and pneumothorax in patients with chest trauma.
Methods
At Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health Riyadh health cluster one Imam Abdulrahman AL Faisal hospital a cross-sectional diagnostic study was carried out over the course of a year. The study included all consecutive patients (n = 255) who had a possible history of chest trauma. A point-of-care ultrasonography-trained emergency medicine physician examined the patients at the bedside using USG, and they then had chest radiography to document hemothorax and pneumothorax.
For chest X-rays (CXRs) and ultrasonography, sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared with the composite gold standard, which consists of computed tomography thorax and chest radiography.
Results
89 percent of the 255 patients were men. The patients' average age was 43.46 years old (standard deviation: 16.3). The most frequent way of injury (81%), was from a road traffic accident (RTA). Four hours (2.5-7) was the median (interquartile range) amount of time that passed between the injury and hospital arrival. In subcutaneous emphysema, 16.1% of the patients were affected. Hemodynamic stability was present in about 88.2% of the patients, and 78% of them also had additional system injuries. When it came to identifying pneumothorax, USG's sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 95.3%, respectively, whereas CXR's were 71.4% and 100%. According to our research, CXR had a 62.9% and 100% sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing hemothorax, while USG had a 79% and 97.9% sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivity of USG in diagnosing pneumothorax and hemothorax was higher than that of CXR, even in the subset of patients in whom a computed tomography scan was performed. Within that patient subset, USG had a better specificity for hemothorax detection than CXR, and it had the same specificity for pneumothorax detection as CXR.
Conclusion
When it came to identifying pneumothorax and hemothorax, USG's sensitivity was higher than CXR's. When it came to identifying pneumothorax and hemothorax, USG's specificities were similar to those of CXR. For this reason, bedside ultrasound done by an emergency physician during resuscitation aids in the quick diagnosis and prompt treatment of patients with chest damage.
References
2. Demirhan, R., Onan, B., Oz, K., & Halezeroglu, S. (2009). Comprehensive analysis of 4205 patients with chest trauma: A 10-year experience. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 9, 450-453. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2009.206599
3. Lecky, F. E., Bouamra, O., Woodford, M., Alexandrescu, R., & O'Brien, S. J. (2010). Epidemiology of polytrauma. In H.-C. Pape, A. B. Peitzman, C. W. Schwab, & P. V. Giannoudis (Eds.), Damage Control Management in the Polytrauma Patient (pp. 13-24). Springer.
4. Vafaei, A., Hatamabadi, H. R., Heidary, K., Alimohammadi, H., & Tarbiyat, M. (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and radiography in initial evaluation of chest trauma patients. Emergency (Tehran), 4, 29-33.
5. Wilkerson, R. G., & Stone, M. B. (2010). Sensitivity of bedside ultrasound and supine anteroposterior chest radiographs for the identification of pneumothorax after blunt trauma. Academic Emergency Medicine, 17, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00628.x
6. Xirouchaki, N., Magkanas, E., Vaporidi, K., et al. (2011). Lung ultrasound in critically ill patients: Comparison with bedside chest radiography. Intensive Care Medicine, 37, 1488-1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2317-y
7. Ebrahimi, A., Yousefifard, M., Mohammad Kazemi, H., Rasouli, H. R., Asady, H., Moghadas Jafari, A., & Hosseini, M. (2014). Diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasonography versus chest radiography for identification of pneumothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tanaffos, 13, 29-40.
8. Cardinale, L., Volpicelli, G., Lamorte, A., & Martino, J. (2012). Revisiting signs, strengths and weaknesses of standard chest radiography in patients of acute dyspnea in the emergency department. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 4, 398-407. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.05.05
9. Lichtenstein, D. A. (2015). BLUE-protocol and FALLS-protocol: Two applications of lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Chest, 147, 1659-1670. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-1313
10. Choudhary, A., Krishnaprasad, K., & Sreeramalu, P. (2015). A clinico-epidemiological study of traumatic chest injuries in a rural tertiary care centre in India: Our experience. International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 6, 110-114.
11. Iyer, S., Singh, M., & Jathen, V. (2018). Study of epidemiology and outcome of chest trauma at an apex tertiary care trauma centre. International Surgery Journal, 5, 3621-3626. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20184634
12. Salama, K. M., Elshaboury, I. M., Huissen, W. M., Eldomiaty, H. A., & Elghoboshy, K. I. (2017). Role of bedside sonography in the assessment of patients with chest trauma in the emergency department of Suez Canal University Hospital. International Surgery Journal, 4, 465-471. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170192
13. Dangi, S. K., Meena, N., & Parmar, A. (2018). A prospective study of chest injuries and associated complications with special reference to surgical emphysema. International Surgery Journal, 5, 873-877. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180482
14. Kasabe, P. S., Jaykar, R., & Patil, P. L. (2016). Clinical profile of chest injury: A prospective observational study. International Surgery Journal, 3, 1372-1378. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20162714
15. Chardoli, M., Hasan-Ghaliaee, T., Akbari, H., & Rahimi-Movaghar, V. (2013). Accuracy of chest radiography versus chest computed tomography in hemodynamically stable patients with blunt chest trauma. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 16, 351-354.
16. Horst, K., Andruszkow, H., Weber, C. D., et al. (2017). Thoracic trauma now and then: A 10-year experience from 16,773 severely injured patients. PLoS One, 12(10), e0186712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186712
17. Rahimi-Movaghar, V., Yousefifard, M., Ghelichkhani, P., et al. (2016). Application of ultrasonography and radiography in detection of hemothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Emergency (Tehran), 4, 116-126.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.