A PRACTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR DISAGGREGATING THE DRIVERS OF DRUG COSTS USING ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
Main Article Content
Keywords
cost driver analysis, drug costs, prescription drugs, health policy, health care costs
Abstract
Background
Prescription drug expenditures represent a significant component of health care costs in Canada, with estimates of $28.8 billion spent in 2014. Identifying the major cost drivers and the effect they have on prescription drug expenditures allows policy makers and researchers to interpret current cost pressures and anticipate future expenditure levels.
Objectives
To identify the major drivers of prescription drug costs and to develop a methodology to disaggregate the impact of each of the individual drivers.
Methods
The methodology proposed in this study uses the Laspeyres approach for cost decomposition. This approach isolates the effect of the change in a specific factor (e.g., price) by holding the other factor(s) (e.g., quantity) constant at the base-period value. The Laspeyres approach is expanded to a multi-factorial framework to isolate and quantify several factors that drive prescription drug cost. Three broad categories of effects are considered: volume, price and drug-mix effects. For each category, important sub-effects are quantified.
Results
This study presents a new and comprehensive methodology for decomposing the change in prescription drug costs over time including step-by-step demonstrations of how the formulas were derived.
Conclusions
This methodology has practical applications for health policy decision makers and can aid researchers in conducting cost driver analyses. The methodology can be adjusted depending on the purpose and analytical depth of the research and data availability.
References
2. CBO. Technological change and the growth of health care spending. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Budget Office; 2008.
3. CIHI. Health care cost drivers: The facts. Ottawa: Author; 2011.
4. Morgan SG. Quantifying components of drug expenditure inflation: the British Columbia Seniors’ Drug Benefit Plan. Health Serv Res 2002;37(5):1243–66.
5. Morgan SG. Drug spending in Canada: Recent trends and causes. Med Care 2004;42(7):635–42.
6. Morgan SG. Drug expenditure trends in the Canadian provinces: magnitude and causes from 1998 to 2004. Healthc Policy 2005;1(1): 85–99.
7. Gerdtham UG, Lundin D. Why did drug spending increase during the 1990s? PharmacoEconomics 2004;22(1):29–42.
8. CIHI. Drivers of prescription drug spending in Canada. Ottawa: Author; 2012.
9. Patented Medicine Prices Review Board. The pharmaceutical trends: Non-Insured Health Benefits (NIHB) Pharmacy Program 1999-2000 to 2001-2002. Ottawa: Author; 2004.
10. Patented Medicine Prices Review Board. Pharmaceutical trends overview report: Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and First Nations and Inuit Health Branch of Health Canada 1997-1998 to 2003-2004. Ottawa: Author; 2006.
11. Patented Medicine Prices Review Board. Public drug plan dispensing fees: a cost-driver analysis, 2001/02 to 2007/08. Ottawa: Author; 2011.
12. Patented Medicine Prices Review Board. Use of the World Health Organization Defined Daily Dose in Canadian drug utilization and cost analyses. Ottawa: Author; 2010.
13. Berndt ER, Cutler DM, Frank RG, Griliches Z, Newhouse JP, Triplett JE. Medical care prices and output. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, ed. Handbook of health economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.; 2000.
14. Diewert WE. The Consumer Price Index and the Index Number Theory: A survey. Vancouver: Vancouver School of Economics, The University of British Columbia, Discussion Paper 01-02; 2001.
15. United Nations Statistics Division. Price and volume measures. In: Updated System of National Accounts (SNA). New York: United Nations; 2008.