COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ROTATIONAL RANGE AND STRENGTH OF GLENOHUMERAL JOINT AND CO-RELATION WITH ROTATOR CUFF TEAR IN BOWLERS AND RACQUET PLAYERS. (A PILOT STUDY)
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
Background: The human shoulder stands as the most flexible joint within our body, boasting an anatomical framework that ensures stability while facilitating an extensive range of motion in diverse orientations. The recurrent abduction-external rotation arm movement, frequently observed in activities like overhead actions in sports such as racquet playing and bowling, exposes the shoulder to an elevated risk of straining various surrounding structures. Among shoulder-related issues, disorders of the rotator cuff take precedence as the primary cause of impairment. This preliminary study seeks to evaluate the comparison between the rotational capacity and strength of the glenohumeral joint, while establishing a potential correlation with instances of rotator cuff tears in individuals engaged in bowling and racquet sports.
Materials & Methods: A well-structured survey was developed to gather information regarding participants, including their demographic details and responses to a questionnaire about shoulder discomfort. In this investigation, a total of 60 individuals meeting specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for participation. These participants were randomly divided into two groups utilizing a random selection method. Before engaging in the study, participants provided their consent by signing a form indicating their willingness to take part, followed by furnishing personal demographic particulars. Subsequently, the subsequent actions were carried out: The range of motion was evaluated using a conventional 360° goniometer, while shoulder strength was assessed through manual muscle testing (MMT). The first group, denoted as Group A, consisted of 30 bowlers, while the second group, Group B, encompassed 30 racquet players.
Results: Based on our research discoveries, a significant contrast emerged in terms of glenohumeral rotational extents, strength of the rotator cuff, and the occurrence of rotator cuff tears when comparing Group A with Group B. The study's outcomes indicated a noteworthy elevation in external rotation range of motion (ROM) among bowlers. However, no substantial variance was observed in internal rotation ROM or strength when assessing the two sets. Furthermore, it became evident that bowlers exhibited a heightened incidence of rotator cuff tears in their dominant shoulder in comparison to racquet players.
Conclusion: The outcomes derived from this research indicate that bowlers exhibit a decreased average internal rotation range of motion (IR ROM) and an increased average external rotation range of motion (ER ROM) in comparison to racquet players. Moreover, a noteworthy connection between internal rotation ROM and the occurrence of rotator cuff tears was observed specifically among bowlers, while such a correlation was not evident among racquet players. These findings carry significance in terms of injury prevention strategies for both bowlers and racquet players targeting shoulder well-being.
References
2. Copeland S. Throwing injuries of the shoulder. Br J Sports Med 1993;27:221–7. .
3. Wilk K, Arrigo C. Current concepts in the rehabilitation of the athletic shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;18: 365–78.
4. Economopoulos KJ, Brockmeier SF. Rotator cuff tears in overhead athletes. Clinics in sports medicine. 2012 Oct 1;31(4):675-92.
5. Conte S, , Requa RK, , Garrick JG. and Disability days in major league baseball. Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29: 431– 436.
6. Jobe FW, Pink M. Classification and treatment of shoulder dysfunction in the overhead athlete. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1993 Aug;18(2):427-32. .
7. Kisner C, Colby LA. Therapeutic exercise: foundations and junior tennis players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996; 24 (6): techniques. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): F.A. Davis, 1990.
8. Labriola JE, Lee TQ, Debski RE, et al. Stability and instability of the glenohumeral joint: The role of shoulder muscles. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14:32S-38S.
9. Konrad GG, Jolly JT, Labriola JE, et al. Thoracohumeral muscle activity alters glenohumeral joint biomechanics during active abduction. J Orthop Res 2006;24:748
10. Borstad JD, Ludewig PM. The effect of long versus short pectoralis minor resting length on scapular kinematics In healthy individuals. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005;35:227-3.
11. Gainor BJ, Piotrowski G, Puhl J, Allen WC, Hagen R. The throw: biomechanics and acute injury. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1980 Mar;8(2):114-8.
12. Van der Hoeven H Kibler WB. Shoulder injuries in tennis players. Br J Sports Med. 2006; 40 (5): 435–440.
13. Bailey LB Shanley E Hawkins R Beattie PF Fritz S Kwartowitz D Thigpen CA Mechanisms of shoulder range of motion deficits in asymptomatic baseball players. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43 (11): 2783–2793.
14. Manske R Wilk KE Davies G Ellenbecker T Reinoid M. Glenohumeral motion deficits: Friend or foe? Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013; 8(5): 537–553.
15. Harryman DT, Sidles J, Clark J, et al. Translation of the humeral head on the glenoid with passive glenohumeral motion. J Bone Joint Surg 1990;72:1334-43.
16. Oyama S, Myers JB, Wassinger CA, Daniel Ricci R, Lephart SM. Asymmetric resting scapular posture in healthy overhead athletes. J Athl Train. 2008;43(6):565–70. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.6.565.
17. Sabick MB, Torry MR, Kim YK, Hawkins RJ. Humeral torque in professional baseball pitchers. The American journal of sports medicine. 2004 Jun;32(4):892-8.
18. American Physical Therapy Association Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2003.
19. Gajdosik RLBohannon RW. Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(12):1867–1872.
20. xxHsieh CY, Phillips RB. Reliability of manual muscle testing with a computerized dynamometer. J Man Phys Ther 1990; 13(2):72-82.