TO DETERMINE IMPORTANCE OF ANTERIOR HUMERAL LINE FOR SUCCESSFUL ANATOMICAL REDUCTION IN THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PAEDIATRIC SUPRACONDYLAR HUMERAL FRACTURES

Main Article Content

Singh Manvendra Pratap

Keywords

.

Abstract

When treating a juvenile supracondylar humeral fracture surgically, the anterior humeral line (AHL) and tilting angle (TA) are employed to evaluate the sagittal plane alignment of the paediatric elbow. There aren't many research that compare the reliabilities of these metrics, though. This study aims to ascertain if radiographic parameter measures are accurate and helpful in attaining anatomical reduction. In contrast to TA, we showed in the present work that determining the AHL location requires a straightforward and accurate measurement. Finding AHL during surgery is a sign that anatomical reduction has been achieved.

Abstract 13 | pdf Downloads 1

References

1. Shank CF, Wiater BP, Pace JL, Jinguji TM, Schmale GA, Bittner RC, Bompadre V, Stults JK, Krengel WF 3rd. The lateral capitellohumeral angle in normal children: mean, variation, and reliability in comparison to Baumann’s angle. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31: 266-271.
2. Kao HK, Lee WC, Yang WE, Chang CH. The posterior intrafocal pin improves sagittal alignment in Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. Injury. 2016;47:842-847.
3. Skolnick MD, Hall JE, Micheli LJ. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Orthopedics. 1980;3:395-406.
4. Moraleda L, Valencia M, Barco R, Gonzalez-Moran G. Natural history of unreduced Gartland type-II supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: a two to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:28-34.
5. Beaty JH, Kasser JR. The elbow region: general concepts in the pediatric patient. In: Beaty JH, Kasser JR, eds. Rockwood and Wilkins’ Fractures in Children. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001:563-575.
6. Simanovsky N, Lamdan R, Hiller N, Simanovsky N. The measurements and standardization of humerocondylar angle in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28:463-465.
7. Mazda K, Boggione C, Fitoussi F, Pennegot GF. Systematic pinning of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. A prospective study of 116 consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:888-893.
8. Takeyasu Y, Murase T, Miyake J, Oka K, Arimitsu S, Moritomo H, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H. Three-dimensional analysis of cubitus varus deformity after supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:440-448.
9. Kasser JR, Beaty JH. Supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus. In: Beaty JH, Kasser JR, eds. Rockwood and Wilkins’ Fractures in Children. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001:578-624.
10. Price CT, Flynn JM. Management of fractures: fractures and dislocations around the elbow. In: Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL, eds. Lovell and Winter’s Pediatric Orthopaedics. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006:1448-1463
11. Skibo L, Reed MH. A criterion for a true lateral radiograph of the elbow in children. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1994;45:287-291.
12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical dat. Biometics. 1977;33:159-174.
13. Turhan E, Aksoy C, Ege A, Bayar A, Keser S, Alpaslan M. Sagittal plane analysis of the open and closed methods in children with displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus (a radiological study). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:739-744.
14. Herman MJ, Boardman MJ, Hoover JR, Chafetz RS. Relationship of the anterior humeral line to the capitellar ossific nucleus: variability with age. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2188-2193.