COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STAPLER HAEMRRHOIDOPEXY AND OPEN HAEMRRHOIDECTOMY
Main Article Content
Keywords
hemorrhoidectomy, stapler, complications, postoperative pains, bleeding
Abstract
Background- Hemorrhoids are one of the most common diseases of mankind, affecting 4%–36% of the general population. Naturally present anal cushions that generate clinical symptoms (expand, bleed, become thrombosed, or prolapse) are referred to as hemorrhoids.
Aim- To study the outcome of stapler haemrrhoidopexy versus open haemrrhoidectomy.
Methods and materials- This prospectivet study was conducted in the department of General Surgery, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PGI, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India over 18 month duration from September 2022 to February 2024. this study comparing Open versus Stapled hemorrhoidopexy for the management of Grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids. Study was conducted on 80 patients admitted and operated for hemorrhoids at our institute who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria.Data was collected by using Proforma. The patients were categorized into two study groups (each included 40 patients): group 1 was treated by stapled hemorrhoidopexy, and group 2 had conventional hemorrhoidectomy.
Results- Of 80 patients, 57 (71.25%) were males and 23 (28.7%) were females. The maximum number of patients (65%) belonged to the age group 31 to 50 years. The predominant symptom was bleeding per rectum in 65% of cases followed by Something protruding out of the anal canal 50 % of cases. The operating time (p= 0.04) and hospital stay (P=0.0003) were much less in the stapler hemorrhoidectomy group as compared to the open procedure group. Also, postoperative pain (visual analogue scale)(p=0.01) was less in the stapler hemorrhoidectomy group. The stapler group had an early return to normal activities as compared to the open hemorrhoidectomy group(P=0.02).
Conclusion- We have concluded that stapled hemorrhoidectomy has good patient compliance, less complications and better outcome. It may be a good choice for treating hemorrhoids of the third and fourth grades. Additional clinical trials are also required to validate our study's findings. In order to prevent a recurrence, it is also essential that patients receive dietary and lifestyle adjustments in addition to surgical care. It is advised to conduct additional research with a larger patient population and a longer follow-up duration in order to provide more positive findings.
References
2. Lord, P. B., Kamm, M. A., & Nichols, R. J. (1994). Hemorrhoids: pathology, pathophysiology and etiology. Br J Surg, 81, 946.
3. Sayfan J, Becker A, Koltun L. Sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy: a new technique. Ann Surg. 2001;234(1):21-4.
4. Milligan ETC, Morgan CN, Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and the operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet. 1937;2:119-24.
5. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2000;355(6):782-5.
6. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;355(9206):779-81.
7. Cataldo P, Ellis CN, Gregorcyk S, et al. Practice parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 48 (2005): 189-194.
8. Agrawal RK, Agrawal P, Chandrakar J. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: A single-center 8 years’ experience. Saudi Surg J 2021; 8:82–85.
9. Loder PB, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Phillips RK: Haemorrhoids: pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology. Br J Surg. 1994, 81:946-954. 10.1002/bjs.1800810707
10. El-Kelani MZ, Kerdahi R, Raghib S, et al.: Recommendations and best practice on the management of hemorrhoidal disease in Saudi Arabia. HospPract. 2022, 50:104-109. 10.1080/21548331.2022.2042150
11. Davis BR, Lee-Kong SA, Migaly J, Feingold DL, Steele SR: The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018, 61:284- 292. 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001030
12. Sofii I, Darmawan H, Kurniawan F, Hanif AS, Resadita R, Ramadhini AS: A new technique for surgical haemorrhoidectomy without post-operative complication: a case series. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022, 76:103467. 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103467
13. Sultan S: Longo procedure (Stapled hemorrhoidopexy): indications, results . J Visc Surg. 2015, 152:11-14. 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.07.009
14. Sachin ID, Muruganathan OP: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus open hemorrhoidectomy: a comparative study of short term results. IntSurg J. 2017, 4:472-478. 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20164791
15. Malyadri N, Allu VJ: A prospective comparative study of stapler hemorrhoidectomyvs open haemorrhoidectomy (Milligan Morgan) in its outcome and postoperative complications. J Surg Res. 2021, 4:4-13. 10.26502/jsr.100200104
16. Surati K, Modi J, Damani S, Prajapati K, Shah A: Comparative study of management of hemorrhoids: stapler vs open hemorrhoidectomy. World J Lap Surg. 2022, 15:8-10. 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1492
17. Singh SP, Singh SP, Gupta V, Quadri K, Gupta M: Comparison between stapler hemorrhoidectomy and open hemorrhoidectomy in the management of grade III and IV hemorrhoids: a prospective randomized study. Int Surg J. 2018, 5:2069-2073. 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181990
18. Kumar M, Pankaj D, Kumar N, et al. (March 17, 2023) A Prospective Study Comparing Stapler and Open Surgical Technique of Hemorrhoidectomy. Cureus 15(3): e36304. DOI 10.7759/cureus.36304