ANALYSIS OF INJURY PATTERNS IN HOMICIDE VICTIMS: A FORENSIC AUTOPSY STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Alcohol, Asphyxiation, Blunt force trauma, Defensive injuries, Forensic autopsy, Gunshot wounds, Homicide, Sharp force trauma
Abstract
Background: Homicide remains a significant public health issue globally, and forensic autopsies are crucial for understanding injury patterns in victims. The type, distribution, and severity of injuries provide valuable insights into the weapon used, the nature of the attack, and the victim's circumstances. Identifying these patterns helps in reconstructing the events surrounding the homicide and aids law enforcement investigations.
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the injury patterns in homicide victims through forensic autopsy findings, focusing on the types of injuries, body regions affected, and the presence of defensive injuries.
Study Design and Setting: A retrospective forensic autopsy study was conducted, reviewing cases of homicide victims examined at Medicolegal Section, Liaquat University Hospital, Hyderabad from Jan 2022 to June 2022.
Methodology: The study included 130 cases of homicide, all confirmed through legal documentation and forensic investigation. Data were collected from autopsy reports, police records, and crime scene investigations. Injuries were categorized as blunt force trauma, sharp force trauma, gunshot wounds, or asphyxiation. Body regions, weapon types, and the presence of defensive injuries were documented. Toxicological analysis was also performed to detect substances like alcohol and drugs. Descriptive statistical methods were employed for data analysis.
Results: Blunt force trauma (38.5%) and sharp force trauma (30.8%) were the most common types of injuries. Head and neck injuries were the most frequent (61.5%), and defensive injuries were present in 29.2% of cases. Alcohol and drugs were detected in 42.3% of victims.
Conclusion: This study highlights the diverse injury patterns in homicide victims, providing crucial insights for forensic investigations. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding the mechanisms of injury to better inform criminal justice strategies and public health interventions.
References
2. Fridel EE. Integrating the literature on lethal violence: A comparison of mass murder, homicide, and homicide-suicide. Homicide studies. 2022 May;26(2):123-47.
3. Talley D, Warner ŞL, Perry D, Brissette E, Consiglio FL, Capri R, Violano P, Coker KL. Understanding situational factors and conditions contributing to suicide among Black youth and young adults. Aggression and violent behavior. 2021 May 1;58:101614.
4. Fontanarosa PB, Bibbins-Domingo K. The unrelenting epidemic of firearm violence. J Am Med Assoc. 2022;328(12):1201-3.
5. Allison K, Klein BR. Pursuing hegemonic masculinity through violence: An examination of anti-homeless bias homicides. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):6859-82.
6. DeJong C, Holt K, Helm B, Morgan SJ. “A human being like other victims”: The media framing of trans homicide in the United States. Critical Criminology. 2021 Mar;29(1):131-49.
7. Petrosky E. Surveillance for violent deaths—National violent death reporting system, 34 States, four California Counties, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2017. MMWR. Surveillance Summaries. 2020;69.
8. Matias A, Gonçalves M, Soeiro C, Matos M. Intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis of risk factors. Aggression and violent behavior. 2020 Jan 1;50:101358.
9. Roubalová M, Králik R, Zaitseva NA, Anikin GS, Popova OV, Kondrla P. Rabbinic Judaism’s perspective on the first crimes against humanity. Bogoslovni vestnik. 2021;81(1):57-74.
10. Wilson RF. Surveillance for violent deaths—national violent death reporting system, 42 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2019. MMWR. Surveillance Summaries. 2022;71.
11. Bows H, Herring J. Getting away with murder? A review of the ‘rough sex defence’. The Journal of Criminal Law. 2020 Dec;84(6):525-38.
12. Lysova A. Challenges to the veracity and the international comparability of Russian homicide statistics. European journal of criminology. 2020;17(4):399-419.
13. Carr MJ, Mok PL, Antonsen S, Pedersen CB, Webb RT. Self-harm and violent criminality linked with parental death during childhood. Psychological medicine. 2020 May;50(7):1224-32.
14. Patnaik KK, Das S, Mohanty S, Panigrahi H. Pattern of isolated fatal mechanical injury in homicidal deaths: A cross-sectional study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2017 Sep;11(9):HC01.
15. Subramanyam S, Janardhanan J. Analysis of Defence Injuries in Homicide Cases Categorised in Accordance to Homicide Injury Scale. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2021 Mar 24;15(2):1010-5.
16. Mathews S, Abrahams N, Jewkes R, Martin LJ, Lombard C, Vetten L. Injury patterns of female homicide victims in South Africa. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2009 Jul 1;67(1):168-72.
17. Marri MZ, Bashir MZ, Munawar AZ, Khalil ZH, urRehman Khalil I. Analysis of homicidal deaths in Peshawar, Pakistan. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad. 2006;18(4):30-3.
18. Raju Surwase. An Analysis of Injuries in Homicidal Deaths based on Cross-Sectional Autopsies. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 2020; 15(6); 2378-2384.
19. Slater S, Subramanyam S. An autopsy study on injuries in homicidal deaths due to weapons. Indian Journal of Forensic and Community Medicine. 2021;8(3):157-60.
20. Ullah A, Raja A, Aamir Y, Hamid A, Khan J. Pattern of causes of death in homicidal cases on autopsy in Pakistan. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences. 2014;12(4).