EFFECTIVENESS OF SLING PROCEDURES FOR UTERO-VAGINAL PROLAPSE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY AT AYUB TEACHING HOSPITAL, ABBOTTABAD

Main Article Content

Dr. Ruqqia Sultana
Ata Ur Rehman
Asad Zia Khan
Irrat Ayesha
Laraib Sarwar
Asfand Yar Ahmad
Javeria Rehman
Bahar Ali

Keywords

.

Abstract

Background: Uterovaginal prolapse (UVP) can significantly impair quality of life in women, underscoring the need for evidence-based treatment solutions. While sling procedures have gained popularity in managing UVP, their effectiveness requires further evaluation.


Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of sling procedures in management of UVP and assess patient satisfaction.


Design: Cross-sectional study.


Setting: Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad.


Population or sample: We included 17 patients aged 30-59 years who underwent sling procedures over a 2-year period, with varying degrees of prolapses.


Methods: A retrospective analysis of case records from 2022 to 2024 was conducted to assess improvements in quality of life, prolapse symptoms, complications and patient satisfaction. Data were collected using structured questionnaires, analysed using SPSS 202, and presented with MS Word.


Main outcome measures: Study aimed to measure the effectiveness of sling procedure in improving symptoms, recurrence and complications.


Results: The study included 17 female patients with an average age of 41.18 ± 9.221 years, ranging from 30 to 59 years, with the majority falling within the 30-39 age group. Most patients (82.35%) underwent spinal anesthesia, while the remaining received general anesthesia. The severity of prolapse varied, with 11 patients diagnosed with second-degree prolapse, 4 with third-degree, and 2 with first-degree prolapse. There was a significant correlation between age and prolapse severity, with older patients more likely to experience advanced stages of prolapse (p=0.036). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted, and all patients expressed high levels of satisfaction with the procedure. Follow-up assessments showed no reported complaints, demonstrating a successful surgery with no complications during recovery.


Conclusion: This retrospective case report analysis confirms the effectiveness of sling procedures in treating UVP, offering a valuable treatment option for patients. The findings support the use of sling procedures as a safe and effective treatment for UVP, with high patient satisfaction and low complication rates.


Funding: This study was conducted independently without any external or institutional funding, based on researchers’ own interest.

Abstract 181 | PDF Downloads 32

References

1. Abid S, Ashraf A. Effectiveness of autologous rectus sheath sling abdominal procedure for utero-vaginal prolapse. JAMDC. 2023;5(3): 125-130.
2. Yaqub U, Shahzad N. Uterine suspension by rectus sheath flap in selected cases of U.V. prolapse. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2013;7(2):322-323.
3. Khan NAU, Fayyaz A, Iqbal R, Attaullah H. Abdominal suspension operation for uterovaginal prolapse using roll strip of rectus sheath as sling. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2020;14(3):714-715.
4. Iqbal S, Arif W, Noreen A. Autologous rectus sheath sling for treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2013;7(3):707-708.
5. Tahir S, Yasmin N, Kanwal S, Aleem M. Abdominal sacrohysteropexy in young women with uterovaginal prolapse. APMC. 2012;6(1):75-80.
6. Shkarupa D, Kubin N, Pisarev A, Zaytseva A, Shapovalova E. The hybrid technique of pelvic organ prolapse treatment: apical sling and subfascial colporrhaphy. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3286-7
7. Banu LF. Synthetic sling for genital prolapse in young women. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 1997 Apr 1;57(1):57-64.
8. Morling JR, McAllister DA, Agur W, Fischbacher CM, Glazener CM, Guerrero K, Hopkins L, Wood R. Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997–2016: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet. 2017 Feb 11;389(10069):629-40.
9. Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER, Sung VW, Myers DL. Suburethral sling treatment of occult stress incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency in women with severe vaginal prolapse of the anterior vs posterior/apical compartment. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2005 May 1;192(5):1566-72.
10. Moore RD, Miklos JR. Colpocleisis and tension-free vaginal tape sling for severe uterine and vaginal prolapse and stress urinary incontinence under local anesthesia. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. 2003 May 1;10(2):276-80.
11 Hefni M, Yousri N, El-Toukhy T, Koutromanis P, Mossa M, Davies A. Morbidity associated with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2007 Nov;276:499-50
12. Zulfiqar S, Karim S, Zulfiqar S. Modified sling procedure for treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. JSZMC. 2018;9(3):1467-9.
13. Akeel NY, Gurland B, Hull T. Pelvic floor disorders related to urology and gynecology. In: Fundamentals of Anorectal Surgery. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 571–82.
14. Wei JT, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Nager CW, Barber MD, Amundsen KK, et al. Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(25):2358–67.
15. Kölle D, Tamussino K, Hanzal E, Tammaa A, Preyer O, Bader A, et al. Bleeding complications with the tension-free vaginal tape operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2005;193(6):2045–9
16. Kausar U. Hena Saiyda Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Hena Saiyda Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
17. Davé BA, Jaber C, Leader-Cramer A, Higgins N, Mueller M, Lewicky-Gaupp C, et al. Effect of anesthesia type on perioperative outcomes with a midurethral sling. Int Urogynecol J