QUALITY OF LIFE AND SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING COMPARISON BETWEEN TRAUMATIC AND NON-TRAUMATIC SPINAL CORD INJURY PATIENTS IN TEACHING HOSPITAL

Main Article Content

Dilshad Gill
Syed Abdur Rub Abidi
Abdul Aziz
Madiha Zia
Faizuddin
Muhammad Talha Hassan
Mian Iftikhar Ul Haq

Keywords

Spinal Cord Injury, Quality of Life, Traumatic Injury, Non-Traumatic Injury.

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injuries (SCI) profoundly affect quality of life and subjective well-being, but comparisons between traumatic and non-traumatic injury types remain underexplored.


Objective: The objective was to compare self-reported life satisfaction and quality of life between traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury patients.


Methodology: This cross-sectional study evaluated 130 patients with spinal cord injuries' quality of life and general wellbeing at the Teaching Hospital of Faisalabad, Pakistan, between March and August of 2023. Adult participants were categorized as ASI A, B, C, or D and had complete or incomplete lesions at the cervical or thoracolumbar levels. SWLS and WHOQOL-BREF questionnaires were used to gather data, and SPSS Version 26 was used for analysis.


Results: In this study of 130 spinal cord injury patients, the injury types were evenly distributed, with 65 (50.00%) having traumatic injuries and 65 (50.00%) having non-traumatic injuries. Most patients (79, 60.77%) were less than 1-year post-injury, and 98 (75.38%) had paraplegia. Quality of life assessments showed no significant difference between injury types (p=0.651). Pain significantly impacted task performance for 43 patients (33.08%), while 26 (20.00%) required extreme medical treatment for daily functioning. Subjective well-being was reported as satisfactory by 19 (27.14%) of traumatic and 27 (41.54%) of non-traumatic patients.


Conclusion: This study found no significant difference in quality of life between traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury patients, underscoring the effectiveness of Faisalabad Teaching Hospital.


 


 

Abstract 41 | pdf Downloads 12

References

1. Groah SL, Charlifue S, Tate D, Jensen MP, Molton IR, Forchheimer M, Krause JS, Lammertse DP, Campbell M. Spinal cord injury and aging: challenges and recommendations for future research. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2012 Jan 1;91(1):80-93.
2. Kang YD, Ding H, Zhou H, Wei Z, Liu L, Pan D, Feng S. Epidemiology of worldwide spinal cord injury: a literature review. J Neurorestoratol. 2018 Dec 30;6(1):3.
3. Engel L, Bryan S, Noonan VK, Whitehurst DG. Using path analysis to investigate the relationships between standardized instruments that measure health-related quality of life, capability wellbeing and subjective wellbeing: an application in the context of spinal cord injury. Social Science & Medicine. 2018 Sep 1;213:154-64.
4. Barclay L, New PW, Morgan PE, Guilcher SJ. Satisfaction with life, health and well-being: comparison between non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, traumatic spinal cord injury and Australian norms. Spinal cord series and cases. 2019 May 23;5(1):50.
5. Ahuja CS, Wilson JR, Nori S, Kotter M, Druschel C, Curt A, Fehlings MG. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nature reviews Disease primers. 2017 Apr 27;3(1):1-21.
6. Williams TL, Joseph C, Nilsson-Wikmar L, Phillips J. The interrelationship between pain, life satisfaction and mental health in adults with traumatic spinal cord injury, in the context of a developing country. Spinal Cord Series and Cases. 2024 Mar 7;10(1):9.
7. Craig A, Nicholson Perry K, Guest R, Tran Y, Middleton J. Adjustment following chronic spinal cord injury: Determining factors that contribute to social participation. British journal of health psychology. 2015 Nov;20(4):807-23.
8. Rivers CS, Fallah N, Noonan VK, Whitehurst DG, Schwartz CE, Finkelstein JA, Craven BC, Ethans K, O'Connell C, Truchon BC, Ho C. Health conditions: effect on function, health-related quality of life, and life satisfaction after traumatic spinal cord injury. A prospective observational registry cohort study. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2018 Mar 1;99(3):443-51.
9. Chang FH, Wang YH, Jang Y, Wang CW. Factors associated with quality of life among people with spinal cord injury: application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2012 Dec 1;93(12):2264-70.
10. Munce SE, Webster F, Fehlings MG, Straus SE, Jang E, Jaglal SB. Perceived facilitators and barriers to self-management in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC neurology. 2014 Dec;14:1-2.
11. New PW, Guilcher SJ, Jaglal SB, Biering-Sørensen F, Noonan VK, Ho C. Trends, challenges, and opportunities regarding research in non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2017 Jan 1;23(4):313-23.
12. McRae J, Smith C, Emmanuel A, Beeke S. The experiences of individuals with cervical spinal cord injury and their family during post-injury care in non-specialised and specialised units in UK. BMC health services research. 2020 Dec;20:1-1.
13. Martin-Herz SP, Zatzick DF, McMahon RJ. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents following traumatic injury: a review. Clinical child and family psychology review. 2012 Sep;15:192-214.
14. Greenham M, Botchway E, Knight S, Bonyhady B, Tavender E, Scheinberg A, Anderson V, Muscara F. Predictors of participation and quality of life following major traumatic injuries in childhood: A systematic review. Disability and rehabilitation. 2022 Jun 5;44(12):2591-607.
15. Migliorini C, Callaway L, New P. Preliminary investigation into subjective well-being, mental health, resilience, and spinal cord injury. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2013 Nov 1;36(6):660-5.
16. Simpson B, Villeneuve M, Clifton S. The experience and perspective of people with spinal cord injury about well-being interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Disability and rehabilitation. 2022 Jul 3;44(14):3349-63.
17. Widerström-Noga E. Neuropathic pain and spinal cord injury: phenotypes and pharmacological management. Drugs. 2017 Jun;77(9):967-84.
18. Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Packel A, Saulino M. The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2012 Nov 1;91(11):911-21.
19. Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2014 May 1;95(5):986-95.

Most read articles by the same author(s)