THE ROLE OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS IN OPTIMIZING SURGICAL DIABETES CARE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Nurse practitioners, surgical diabetes care, patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, traditional care, diabetes management, multidisciplinary teams
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of nurse practitioners for the improvement of surgical diabetes care and the differences between them and traditional models of care. Our study was a comparative study in which we included 150 patients; 75 were under care from nurse practitioners and 75 under conventional care. Some of the parameters assessed comprise age, duration of diabetes, preoperative HbA1c levels, and patient satisfaction. It was found that patients cared for by nurse practitioners had slightly better outcomes in these regards, although the variability was also cut down which points towards better standardization of care. This study found that the patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher among the patients that received care from the nurse practitioners as compared to the rest of the groups. The gender distribution, diabetes type, and comorbidities were also investigated the study and it was observed that there were no demographic disparities. Consequently, our results raise the possibility of developing surgical diabetes care teams with the inclusion of nurse practitioners. The study offers significant information on how NPs may improve patients’ management, satisfaction, and outcomes. The conclusions for the healthcare policy and practice point to the fact that the nurse practitioners are an essential part of enhancing the surgical diabetes care quality and should be taken into consideration in the strategic planning of the teams. More studies should be conducted in the future to establish the long-term effects of the involvement of nurse practitioners on surgical performances and patients’ well-being.
References
2. Davies, M. J., D’Alessio, D. A., Fradkin, J., Kernan, W. N., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., ... & Buse, J. B. (2018). Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes care, 41(12), 2669.
3. Wallace, A., Bhai, M., & Hughes, D. R. The effects of nurse practitioner scope of practice laws on diabetic health care costs. Contemporary Economic Policy.
4. Litaker, D., MION, L. C., Planavsky, L., Kippes, C., Mehta, N., & Frolkis, J. (2003). Physician–nurse practitioner teams in chronic disease management: the impact on costs, clinical effectiveness, and patients' perception of care. Journal of interprofessional care, 17(3), 223-237.
5. J. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2014.
6. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2008). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
7. S. Kvale and S. Brinkmann, Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2014.
8. Litaker, D., MION, L. C., Planavsky, L., Kippes, C., Mehta, N., & Frolkis, J. (2003). Physician–nurse practitioner teams in chronic disease management: the impact on costs, clinical effectiveness, and patients' perception of care. Journal of interprofessional care, 17(3), 223-237.
9. Knudtson, N. (2000). Patient satisfaction with nurse practitioner service in a rural setting. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 12(10), 405-412.
10. Everett, C., Thorpe, C., Palta, M., Carayon, P., Bartels, C., & Smith, M. A. (2013). Physician assistants and nurse practitioners perform effective roles on teams caring for Medicare patients with diabetes. Health affairs, 32(11), 1942-1948.
11. Goryakin, Y., Griffiths, P., & Maben, J. (2011). Economic evaluation of nurse staffing and nurse substitution in health care: a scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(4), 501-512.
12. Ruiz, L. M. (2024). Multidisciplinary team attitudes to an advanced nurse practitioner service in an emergency department. Emergency Nurse, 32(2).
13. Stanik-Hutt, J., Newhouse, R. P., White, K. M., Johantgen, M., Bass, E. B., Zangaro, G., ... & Weiner, J. P. (2013). The quality and effectiveness of care provided by nurse practitioners. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 9(8), 492-500.
14. Talari, K., & Goyal, M. (2020). Retrospective studies–utility and caveats. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 50(4), 398-402.
15. Danaei, G., Tavakkoli, M., & Hernán, M. A. (2012). Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins. American journal of epidemiology, 175(4), 250-262.
16. McMenamin, A., Turi, E., Schlak, A., & Poghosyan, L. (2023). A systematic review of outcomes related to nurse practitioner-delivered primary care for multiple chronic conditions. Medical Care Research and Review, 80(6), 563-581.
17. Wieczorek-Wójcik, B., Gaworska-Krzemińska, A., Owczarek, A., Wójcik, M., Orzechowska, M., & Kilańska, D. (2022). The Influence of Nurse Education Level on Hospital Readmissions—A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 4177.
18. Pleshkan, V. (2024). A systematic review: clinical education and preceptorship during nurse practitioner role transition. Journal of professional nursing, 50, 16-34.