PREEMPTIVE DEEP TENSION SUTURING IN PREVENTION OF BURST ABDOMEN

Main Article Content

Daleep kumar
Nadia Shahid
Mir Arsalan Ali
Yasir Murtaza
Aun Ali
Muhammad Tahir

Keywords

Surgical complications, wound dehiscence, burst abdomen, deep tension sutures, laparotomy

Abstract

Background :Burst abdomen is a major complication associated with contaminated or dirty surgeries, including emergency midline laparotomy. Possible causative factors involve wound sepsis, patients’ overall pressure inside the abdomen, and many system problems. Conventional oncosurgical approaches could prove inadequate, leading to evaluation of preventive methods, such as DTS, of minimizing such adverse outcomes.


Objectives :To evaluate the level of success of deep tension suturing done before the primary closure of the abdomen against formation of burst abdomen, wound infection, and incisional hernia than mass closure techniques.


Study design: A Cross sectional study.


Place and duration of study. This  Cross Sectional study was carried out at Setting: Done at Ziauddin Hospital, Civil Hospital- ward 06, and PAF Hospital, Karachi from Change the dates in duration of study as follows: January 2019 to Jan 2022


Methods: A Cross Sectional study which involved 100 adults who were posted for emergency midline laparotomy due to generalized peritonitis. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A: conventional mass closure Group B: closure with DTS. Both groups received simple polypropylene sutures for wound closure as in the standard mesh repair technique but not in group B they also received four deep tension sutures using the rubber tubing to distribute tension over wider areas of the tissue. Patients with diabetes, immunosuppression, or use of corticosteroids were excluded as a result.


Results


The age in years of the participants was 31.61 ± 9.31 years; the maximum age was 61 years, the minimum was 18 years. The observation was made that the incidence of burst abdomen in Group B was 4 and that of Group A was 18 (p<0.05). Bacteremia was noticed in 10 Pt’s in Group B and 17 Pt’s in Group A(p<0.05). Postoperative incisional hernia was identified in seven patients in Group A and none in Group B with p<0.05. These outcomes show decreases in all of the primary complications when implementing DTS on the approaches as there were statistically significant improvements for all of them.


Conclusion :The pro-active use of deep tension sutures in emergency midline laparotomy dramatically decreases the rate of burst abdomen, wound infection, and incisional hernia. As tension on the wound edges is reduced by DTS, the study shows that postoperative complications are preventable in high-risk surgeries, patient benefits maximized, and reoperations minimized.

Abstract 114 | pdf Downloads 23

References

1. Gupta, N., Cohen, M., & Wiesel, O. (2016). "Risk factors and prevention of abdominal wound dehiscence." Journal of Surgical Research, 201(1), 11-20.
2. Hesselink, V.J., Luijendijk, R.W., de Wilt, J.H.W., et al. (1993). "Incisional hernia recurrence following 'vest-over-pants' repair." World Journal of Surgery, 17(5), 611-616.
3. Kenig, J., & Richter, P. (2013). "Risk factors of early mortality in patients treated surgically for perforated duodenal ulcer." Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 17(1), 1-7.
4. Leaper, D.J., van Goor, H., Reilly, J., et al. (2013). "Surgical site infection—a European perspective of incidence and economic burden." Journal of Hospital Infection, 86(3), 184-194.
5. Suture techniques: Knaebel, H.P., Koch, M., Sauerland, S., et al. (2005). "Primary suture of burst abdomen: outcome prediction based on a retrospective multi-centre study." British Journal of Surgery, 92(3), 392-394.
6. Deep tension sutures: Kingsnorth, A.N., & LeBlanc, K.A. (2013). "Management of abdominal hernias." Springer, 140-147.
7. Component separation technique: de Vries Reilingh, T.S., van Goor, H., Charbon, J.A., et al. (2007). "Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: 'components separation technique' versus prosthetic repair: interim analysis of a A Cross Sectional study." World Journal of Surgery, 31(4), 756-763.
8. Mesh complications: Cobb, W.S., Warren, J.A., Ewing, J.A., et al. (2015). "Open ventral hernia repair with mesh: analysis of wound complications using the ACS-NSQIP." American Journal of Surgery, 210(4), 712-719
9. Esmat, M.E., et al. (Year). Title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages.
10. Burger, J.W., van't Riet, M., Jeekel, J. (2002). Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 91(4), 315-321. DOI: 10.1177/145749690209100408
11. Kingsnorth, A.N., LeBlanc, K.A. (2013). Management of Abdominal Hernias. Springer. (This reference is a book, so it does not have a DOI. Replace with a more precise citation if needed.)
12. Hsiao, C.W., Chou, M.Y., Cheng, S.H., Lin, H.C. (2001). Comparison of absorbable suture materials in abdominal surgery: randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Surgery, 181(6), 549-552.DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00619-5
13. Marwah, S., Marwah, N., Singh, M. (2005). Management of burst abdomen using rectus sheath relaxation incisions. World Journal of Surgery, 29(1), 121-125.DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7470-4
14. Bucknall, T.E., Cox, P.J., Ellis, H. (1982). Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: A prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. BMJ, 284(6320), 931-933.DOI: 10.1136/bmj.284.6320.931
15. Rangaswamy, M. (2010). Prevention of incisional hernia post-abdominoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 125(4), 1025-1030.DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c76d9e

Most read articles by the same author(s)