LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY FOR PANCREATIC TUMORS: A COMPARISON OF OUTCOME PROFILES
Main Article Content
Keywords
Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Laparoscopy, Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Outcomes.
Abstract
Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex surgical procedure primarily used to treat pancreatic and periampullary tumors, associated with high morbidity and mortality. The benefit and safety of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) for the treatment of pancreatic or periampullary tumors remain controversial.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in a developing country.
Methods: This concurrent cohort study, conducted at Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, from September 2022 to September, 2024, enrolled 59 patients with resectable periampullary cancers. Data were collected using a specific proforma and analyzed with SPSS version 26. The independent t-test compared continuous variables between laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy groups, the Chi-square test and logistic regression evaluated the impact of the procedures on outcomes.
Results: LPD was associated with a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (7.80days) compared to open PD (16.50days; p<0.001). Additionally, LPD resulted in significantly less blood loss (202.50ml) compared to OPD (415.00ml, p<0.001). The operative time for LPD was notably longer (357.00minutes) compared to OPD (230.00minutes; p<0.001). The rates of postoperative complications, including delayed gastric emptying, pancreatic fistula, and surgical site infections, were comparable between LPD and OPD, with no significant differences in overall morbidity and mortality (p=0.506).
Conclusion: LPD is a viable and effective procedure, offering benefits such as a shorter length of stay and reduced blood loss compared to OPD. However, the clinical advantages of LPD over OPD appear to be marginal, even with significant procedural expertise.
References
2. Klompmaker S, Van Hilst J, Wellner UF, Busch OR, Coratti A, D’Hondt M, Dokmak S, Festen S, Kerem M, Khatkov I, Lips DJ, Lombardo C, Luyer M, Manzoni A, Molenaar IQ, Rosso E, Saint-Marc O, Vansteenkiste F, Wittel UA, Bonsing B, Groot Koerkamp B, Abu Hilal M, Fuks D, Poves I, Keck T, Boggi U, Besselink MG. Outcomes after minimally-invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: A pan-european propensity score matched study. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2020 Feb 1 [cited 2024 Aug 27];271(2):356–63. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/fulltext/2020/02000/outcomes_after_minimally_invasive_versus_open.25.aspx
3. Pinchot SN, Weber SM. Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Illustrative Handbook of General Surgery: Second Edition [Internet]. 2020 Aug 19 [cited 2024 Aug 27];699–713. Available from: http://europepmc.org/books/NBK560747
4. Feng Q, Liao W, Xin Z, Jin H, Du J, Cai Y, Liao M, Yuan K, Zeng Y. Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Versus Conventional Open Approach for Patients With Pancreatic Duct Adenocarcinoma: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vol. 11, Frontiers in Oncology. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2021.
5. Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Villacreses D, Mody K, Johnson E, Li Z, Asbun HJ. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution. Surg Endosc. 2017 May 1;31(5):2233–41.
6. Torphy RJ, Fujiwara Y, Schulick RD. Pancreatic cancer treatment: better, but a long way to go. Surg Today. 2020;50(10):1117–25.
7. Simon R. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgical Clinics. 2021;101(5):865–74.
8. Hunger R, Seliger B, Ogino S, Mantke R. Mortality factors in pancreatic surgery: A systematic review. How important is the hospital volume? International Journal of Surgery. 2022;101:106640.
9. Cawich SO, Cabral R, Douglas J, Thomas DA, Mohammed FZ, Naraynsingh V, Pearce NW. Whipple’s procedure for pancreatic cancer: training and the hospital environment are more important than volume alone. Surgery in Practice and Science. 2023;14:100211.
10. Del Valle JP, Mahvi DA, Fairweather M, Wang J, Clancy TE, Ashley SW, Urman RD, Whang EE, Gold JS. The improvement in post-operative mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2006 and 2016 is associated with an improvement in the ability to rescue patients after major morbidity, not in the rate of major morbidity. Hpb. 2021;23(3):434–43.
11. Smits FJ, Verweij ME, Daamen LA, van Werkhoven CH, Goense L, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA, Busch OR, van Dam RM, van Eijck CHJ. Impact of complications after pancreatoduodenectomy on mortality, organ failure, hospital stay, and readmission: analysis of a nationwide audit. Ann Surg. 2022;275(1):e222–8.
12. van Rijssen LB, Zwart MJ, Van Dieren S, de Rooij T, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, van Dam RM, van Eijck CH, Gerhards MF, Gerritsen JJ. Variation in hospital mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy is related to failure to rescue rather than major complications: a nationwide audit. Hpb. 2018;20(8):759–67.
13. Kolbeinsson HM, Chandana S, Wright GP, Chung M. Pancreatic cancer: a review of current treatment and novel therapies. Journal of Investigative Surgery. 2023;36(1):2129884.
14. Yin T, Qin T, Wei K, Shen M, Zhang Z, Wen J, Pan S, Guo X, Zhu F, Wang M, Zhang H, Hilal MA, Qin R. Comparison of safety and effectiveness between laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery [Internet]. 2022;105:106799. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com /science/article/pii/S1743919122005763
15. Feng Q, Xin Z, Zhu B, Liao M, Liao W, Zeng Y. Perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes following laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy after learning curve in the past 10 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg. 2021;10(5):1655.
16. Yan Y, Hua Y, Chang C, Zhu X, Sha Y, Wang B. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumor: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies. Front Oncol. 2023;12:1093395.
17. Jamal A, Shakeel O, Mohsin J, Malik AA, Haq IU, Begum S, Khan SM, Hanif F, Kabir SI, Syed AA. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Outcomes of a complex surgical procedure from a developing country. Pancreatology. 2020;20(7):1534–9.
18. Noor MA, Hanif F, Shakeel O, Bari H. Pancreaticogastrostomy: a safe option in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head and periampullary neoplasms. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2020;30(1):51–6.
19. Pancreatic cancer incidence statistics | Cancer Research UK. [cited 2024 Sep 25]. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/pancreatic-cancer/incidence#heading-Zero
20. Nickel F, Haney C, Probst P, Kowalewski KF, Diener M, Limen E, Strobel O, Müller-Stich BP, Hackert T. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. HPB. 2020;22:S322.
21. Wang M, Li D, Chen R, Huang X, Li J, Liu Y, Liu J, Cheng W, Chen X, Zhao W, Li J, Tan Z, Huang H, Li D, Zhu F, Qin T, Ma J, Yu G, Zhou B, Zheng S, Tang Y, Han W, Meng L, Ke J, Feng F, Chen B, Yin X, Chen W, Ma H, Xu J, Liu Y, Lin R, Dong Y, Yu Y, Liu J, Zhang H, Qin R. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2021 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Aug 27];6(6):438–47. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S2468125321000546/fulltext
22. Aiolfi A, Lombardo F, Bonitta G, Danelli P, Bona D. Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Vol. 73, Updates in Surgery. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; 2021. p. 909–22.