EVALUATION OF CAROTID ARTERY INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH ATHEROSCLEROTIC RISK FACTORS IN HYPERTENSION AND TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS: A OBSERVATIONAL STUDY.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Carotid artery intima media thickness, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular diseases play a major role in the mortality rates of individuals suffering from diabetes mellitus (DM). The American Heart Association identifies carotid artery intima media thickness (CIMT) as a reliable, non-invasive, and economical approach for evaluating sub-clinical atherosclerosis. This research sought to investigate CIMT and its correlation with atherosclerotic risk factors in patients diagnosed with hypertension and type 2 DM.
Methods: The research involved 100 adult patients over the age of 30 of both genders, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and admitted to the inpatient department. CIMT measurements were taken using a Philips Epiq 7G ultrasound machine equipped with a high-frequency (3 to 12 MHz) linear transducer.
Results: The participants had an average age of 57.40 ± 8.0 years, with 62% identifying as male. Among them, 17 patients were diagnosed with atheroembolic disease. The mean carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) was measured at 0.72 ± 0.21 mm, with 30 patients presenting a high CIMT (>0.9 mm). The high-CIMT group demonstrated significantly greater mean body mass index and waist circumference (p < 0.05). Furthermore, both mean HbA1c and mean post-prandial blood sugar levels were notably higher in this subgroup (p < 0.05). Additionally, the mean creatinine levels and lipid profiles were significantly elevated in the high-CIMT group (p < 0.05). Importantly, 43.33% of patients in the high-CIMT group exhibited signs of atheroembolic disease, in contrast to just 5.71% in the low-CIMT group.
Conclusion: A significant number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus showed increased carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT). Additionally, individuals with higher CIMT levels had a markedly greater occurrence of atherosclerotic risk factors, indicating that CIMT is a strong marker for atherosclerosis.
References
2. Sinha AK, Eigenbrodt M, Mehta JL. Does carotid intima media thickness indicate coronary atherosclerosis? CurrOpinCardiol2002;17:526‑30.
3. Frouse Jr. An evaluation of methods for imaging and quantifying coronary and carotid lumen stenosis and Atherosclerosis. Circulation 1993;87(II):1117-33.
4. Jacoby DS, Mohler ER 3rd, Rader DJ. Noninvasive atherosclerosis imaging for predicting cardiovascular events and assessing therapeutic interventions. CurrAtheroscler Rep 2004;6:20‑26.
5. Van der Meer IM, Iglesias del Sol A, Hak AE, Bots ML, Hofman A, Witteman JC, et al. Risk factors for progression of atherosclerosis measured at multiple sites in the arterial tree: The Rotterdam study. Stroke 2003;34:2374‑79.
6. Donahoe SM, Stewart GC, McCabe CH, Mohanavelu S, Murphy SA, Cannon CP, et al. Diabetes and mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2007;298:765–75.
7. O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson Jr SK. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardialinfarction and stroke in older adults, Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340:14–22.
8. Yamasaki Y, Kodama M, Nishizawa H, Sakamoto K, Matsuhisa M, Kajimoto Y, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness in Japanese type 2 diabetic subjects: predictors of progression and relationship with incidentcoronary heart disease. Diab Care 2000;23:1310–15.
9. Bonora E, Tessari R, Micciolo R, Zenere M, Targher G, Padovani R, et al. Intimalmedial thickness of the carotid artery in nondiabetic and NIDDM patients. Relationship with insulin resistance. Diab Care 1997;20:627-31.
10. Ciccone M, Maiorano A, De Pergola G, Minenna A, Giorgino R, Rizzon P. Microcirculatory damage of common carotid artery wall in obese and non-obese subjects. Clin HemorheolMicrocirc1999;21:365-74.