Evaluating the Effects of Toxicological Factors on Pelvic Pain Syndromes in Women(1)
Main Article Content
Keywords
toxicological factors, pelvic pain syndromes, prevalence, severity
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of toxicological factors, such as environmental pollutants, chemical exposures, and occupational hazards, on the prevalence and severity of pelvic pain syndromes (PPS) in women.
Methodology: Baseline data were collected through comprehensive physical exams, toxicological screenings (via blood and urine tests), and detailed questionnaires regarding lifestyle, occupational hazards, and previous exposure to harmful substances such as pesticides, heavy metals, and industrial chemicals. Primary outcome measures included the severity of pelvic pain assessed through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), quality of life (QoL) measured using the Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire (PPIQ), and serum levels of inflammatory markers like interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).
Results: The results of the study indicated that the exposed group had significantly higher pain severity than the non-exposed group. The mean VAS score for pain severity in the exposed group was 6.5 ± 1.8, compared to 4.1 ± 1.5 in the non-exposed group, with a statistically significant p value of less than 0.01. Quality of life also appeared to be negatively affected by toxicological exposures. Women in the exposed group had lower PPIQ scores, with a mean of 52.3 ± 10.4, compared to 64.8 ± 9.7 in the non-exposed group (p < 0.05), indicating a poorer quality of life. Furthermore, inflammatory marker analysis revealed that women in the exposed group had elevated levels of IL-6, averaging 10.2 pg/mL compared to 4.7 pg/mL in the non-exposed group (p < 0.001). Menstrual irregularities were more commonly reported among exposed women, with 45% experiencing irregular cycles versus 22% of those in the non-exposed group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The findings from this study suggest that toxicological exposure may significantly contribute to the exacerbation of pelvic pain symptoms and a decline in the quality of life among women suffering from pelvic pain syndromes. The exposed group experienced more severe pain, higher inflammatory markers, and greater menstrual irregularities than the non-exposed group.
References
2. Adamian L, Urits I, Orhurhu V, Hoyt D, Driessen R, Freeman JA, Kaye AD, Kaye RJ, Garcia AJ, Cornett EM, Viswanath O. A comprehensive review of the diagnosis, treatment, and management of urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Current pain and headache reports. 2020 Jun;24:1-1.
3. Casale R, Atzeni F, Bazzichi L, Beretta G, Costantini E, Sacerdote P, Tassorelli C. Pain in women: a perspective review on a relevant clinical issue that deserves prioritization. Pain and therapy. 2021 Jun;10:287-314.
4. Dashdondov O, Wazir J, Sukhbaatar G, Mikrani R, Dorjsuren B, Aktar N, Zhou X. Herbal nutraceutical treatment of chronic prostatitis–chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a literature review. International Urology and Nephrology. 2021 Aug;53(8):1515-28.
5. Marcu I, Gee A, Lynn B. Cannabinoids and chronic pelvic pain in women: focus on endometriosis. Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders. 2021 Sep;13(3):155-65.
6. Carrubba AR, Ebbert JO, Spaulding AC, DeStephano D, DeStephano CC. Use of cannabis for self-management of chronic pelvic pain. Journal of Women's Health. 2021 Sep 1;30(9):1344-51.
7. Augé C, Gamé X, Vergnolle N, Lluel P, Chabot S. Characterization and validation of a chronic model of cyclophosphamide-induced interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome in rats. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2020 Aug 28;11:1305.
8. Huh JW, Tanksley J, Chino J, Willett CG, Dewhirst MW. Long-term consequences of pelvic irradiation: toxicities, challenges, and therapeutic opportunities with pharmacologic mitigators. Clinical Cancer Research. 2020 Jul 1;26(13):3079-90.
9. Croisier E, Brown T, Bauer J. The efficacy of dietary fiber in managing gastrointestinal toxicity symptoms in patients with gynecologic cancers undergoing pelvic radiotherapy: a systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2021 Feb 1;121(2):261-77.
10. Fernandes DC, Andreyev HJ. Gastrointestinal toxicity of pelvic radiotherapy: are we letting women down?. Clinical Oncology. 2021 Sep 1;33(9):591-601.
11. Vrekoussis T, Siafaka V, Tsitou A, Tsonis O, Navrozoglou I, Makrigiannakis A, Paschopoulos M. Endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain: A mini review on pathophysiology and impact on mental health. Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders. 2020 Mar;12(1):35-40.
12. Hellman KM, Oladosu FA, Garrison EF, Roth GE, Dillane KE, Tu FF. Circulating sex steroids and bladder pain sensitivity in dysmenorrhea. Molecular Pain. 2021 Oct;17:17448069211035217.
13. Sachedina A, Todd N. Dysmenorrhea, endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain in adolescents. Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology. 2020 Feb 1;12(Suppl 1):7-17.
14. Gunyeli I, Saygin M, Ozmen O. Methotrexate-induced toxic effects and the ameliorating effects of astaxanthin on genitourinary tissues in a female rat model. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2021 Oct;304:985-97.
15. Kuret T, Peskar D, Erman A, Veranič P. A systematic review of therapeutic approaches used in experimental models of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Biomedicines. 2021 Jul 22;9(8):865.
16. Lee J, Jeong Y, Mok S, Choi K, Park J, Moon HB, Choi G, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Choi SR, Kim S. Associations of exposure to phthalates and environmental phenols with gynecological disorders. Reproductive Toxicology. 2020 Aug 1;95:19-28.