IN THE FIELD OF SURFACE DIGITAL ANALYSIS, PROOF ON A NEWLY DEVELOPED METHOD: THE METHOD OF PLASTIC SURGERY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Plastic Surgery, Surface Digital Study, Measurement Accuracy, Cutaneous Cancer, Flap, Digital Tool, Validation
Abstract
Background: In the field of cosmetic surgery, precise measurement of anatomical regions is crucial, particularly when documenting cases such as cutaneous cancers or flaps. Traditional methods using simple rulers are often inadequate for accurate and consistent measurement, leading to a need for improved techniques.
Objective: To develop and validate a novel approach to surface digital study and demonstrate its application in plastic surgery.
Methods: A new method for surface digital study was conceptualized, developed, and validated. The process involved the creation of a digital tool that can accurately measure and analyze surface areas depicted in clinical images. This tool was tested in a controlled experimental setting with simulated patients to ensure precision and reliability.
Results: The novel surface digital study method showed significant improvement in the accuracy and consistency of measurements compared to traditional ruler-based techniques. The digital tool was able to provide precise measurements of various anatomical regions, which were validated against known standards.
Conclusion: The newly developed surface digital study method offers a reliable and accurate alternative to traditional measurement techniques in plastic surgery. Its application can enhance the precision of documentation and analysis in clinical practice, leading to better patient outcomes and more robust data collection.
References
2. Cavalu, S., Antoniac, I. V., Mohan, A., Bodog, F., Doicin, C., Mates, I., Ulmeanu, M., Murzac, R., & Semenescu, A. (2020). Nanoparticles and nanostructured surface fabrication for innovative cranial and maxillofacial surgery. Materials, 13(23), 5391.
3. Chambrone, L., de Castro Pinto, R. C. N., & Chambrone, L. A. (2019). The concepts of evidence‐based periodontal plastic surgery: Application of the principles of evidence‐based dentistry for the treatment of recession‐type defects. Periodontology 2000, 79(1), 81-106.
4. Chen, B., Genovese, K., & Pan, B. (2020). In vivo panoramic human skin shape and deformation measurement using mirror-assisted multi-view digital image correlation. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 110, 103936.
5. Cicciù, M., Fiorillo, L., D’Amico, C., Gambino, D., Amantia, E. M., Laino, L., Crimi, S., Campagna, P., Bianchi, A., & Herford, A. S. (2020). 3D digital impression systems compared with traditional techniques in dentistry: a recent data systematic review. Materials, 13(8), 1982.
6. Cristache, C. M., Tudor, I., Moraru, L., Cristache, G., Lanza, A., & Burlibasa, M. (2021). Digital workflow in maxillofacial prosthodontics—an update on defect data acquisition, editing, and design using open-source and commercially available software. Applied Sciences, 11(3), 973.
7. Gibelli, D., Dolci, C., Cappella, A., & Sforza, C. (2020). Reliability of optical devices for three-dimensional facial anatomy description: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 49(8), 1092-1106.
8. Ho, C.-T., Lin, H.-H., & Lo, L.-J. (2019). Intraoral scanning and setting up the digital final occlusion in three-dimensional planning of orthognathic surgery: its comparison with the dental model approach. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 143(5), 1027e-1036e.
9. Jarvis, T., Thornburg, D., Rebecca, A. M., & Teven, C. M. (2020). Artificial intelligence in plastic surgery: current applications, future directions, and ethical implications. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery–Global Open, 8(10), e3200.
10. Krause, M., Krüger, S., Müller, G., Püschel, K., & Frosch, K.-H. (2019). How can the articular surface of the tibial plateau be best exposed? A comparison of specific surgical approaches. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 139, 1369-1377.
11. Lee, G. K., Moshrefi, S., Fuertes, V., Veeravagu, L., Nazerali, R., & Lin, S. J. (2021). What is your reality? Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality in plastic surgery training, education, and practice. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 147(2), 505-511.
12. Li, Z., Koban, K. C., Schenck, T. L., Giunta, R. E., Li, Q., & Sun, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence in dermatology image analysis: current developments and future trends. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(22), 6826.
13. Liang, X., Yang, X., Yin, S., Malay, S., Chung, K. C., Ma, J., & Wang, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence in plastic surgery: applications and challenges. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 45, 784-790.
14. Nerad, J. A. (2020). Techniques in Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery E-Book: A Personal Tutorial. Elsevier Health Sciences.
15. Petrides, G., Clark, J. R., Low, H., Lovell, N., & Eviston, T. J. (2021). Three-dimensional scanners for soft-tissue facial assessment in clinical practice. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 74(3), 605-614.
16. Rudy, H. L., Wake, N., Yee, J., Garfein, E. S., & Tepper, O. M. (2020). Three-dimensional facial scanning at the fingertips of patients and surgeons: accuracy and precision testing of iPhone X three-dimensional scanner. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 146(6), 1407-1417.
17. Solav, D., Moerman, K. M., Jaeger, A. M., & Herr, H. M. (2019). A framework for measuring the time-varying shape and full-field deformation of residual limbs using 3-D digital image correlation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 66(10), 2740-2752.
18. Tork, S., Jefferson, R. C., & Janis, J. E. (2019). Acellular dermal matrices: applications in plastic surgery. Seminars in plastic surgery,
19. Yang, W.-f., Zhang, C.-Y., Choi, W., Zhu, W.-Y., Li, D., Chen, X.-S., Du, R., & Su, Y.-X. (2020). A novel ‘surgeon-dominated ’ approach to the design of 3D-printed patient-specific surgical plates in mandibular reconstruction: A proof-of-concept study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 49(1), 13-21.