COMPLETING THE AUDIT LOOP:SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AT TYPE D HOSPITAL, TORU, MARDAN, KPK, PAKISTAN
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) represent a significant concern in healthcare, posing risks to patient safety, prolonging hospital stays, and increasing medical costs.
Objectives: The goals of reaudit in the context of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) are to assess the impact of previously implemented interventions, ensuring they have effectively reduced SSI rates and have been integrated into daily practice.
Methods: The reaudit of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) follows a systematic approach to evaluate the impact of interventions implemented after the initial audit. A retrospective cohort study design is employed to compare data from the first and second audit cycles.In the first audit cycle, data from 1000 patients were collected and analyzed.In the second audit cycle, data from 1180 patients were reviewed to assess the impact of interventions.
Results: The reaudit of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) reveals significant findings based on the comparison between the first and second audit cycles. In the first audit cycle, out of 1000 patients, 120 patients (12%) developed SSIs. Compliance with these protocols increased from 65% in the first cycle to 85% in the second cycle.Statistical analysis confirmed the effectiveness of the interventions. The incidence rate of SSIs significantly decreased from 12% in the first cycle to 7.97% in the second cycle (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Systematic evaluation and targeted interventions significantly reduce SSI rates and improve patient outcomes. Continuous monitoring and adherence to protocols are essential for maintaining high standards of surgical care and patient safety.
References
2. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). Surgical Site Infection: Prevention and Treatment of Surgical Site Infection. London: RCOG Press; 2008 Oct. (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 74.) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53731/
3. Salako, A. A., Badmus, T. A., Onyia, C. U., David, R. A., Adejare, I. E., Lawal, A. O., Onyeze, C. I., &Ndegbu, C. U. (2019). An audit of surgical site infection following open prostatectomy in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. African Health Sciences, 19(2), 2068-2072. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v19i2.30
4. Feneley RC, Hopley IB, Wells PN. Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology. 2015;39(8):459–470.
5. Sattar F, Sattar Z, Zaman M, et al. Frequency of post-operative surgical site infections in a tertiary care hospital in abbottabad, Pakistan. Cureus 2019;11:e4243. doi:10.7759/cureus.4243
6. Khan, F. U., Fang, Y., Khan, Z., Khan, F. U., Malik, Z. I., Ahmed, N., ... & Rehman, A. U. (2020). Occurrence, associated risk factors, and treatment of surgical site infections in Pakistan. European Journal of Inflammation, 18, 2058739220960547.
7. Khan, F. U., Khan, Z., Rehman, A. U., Rabbi, F., Ahmed, N., & Fang, Y. U. (2020). Perception of surgical teams towards surgical site infections in tertiary care hospital Islamabad, Pakistan. Indian Journal of Surgery, 82, 394-401.
8. Sajun, S. Z., Albutt, K., Moosajee, U. S., Drevin, G., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Samad, L. (2020). Self-diagnosis of surgical site infections: lessons from a tertiary care centre in Karachi, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(1), S55.
9. Khan, F. U., Khan, Z., Ahmed, N., & Rehman, A. U. (2020). A general overview of incidence, associated risk factors, and treatment outcomes of surgical site infections. Indian Journal of Surgery, 82, 449-459.
10. Khan, Z., Ahmed, N., Rehman, A. U., Khan, F. U., Saqlain, M., Martins, M. A. P., & Rahman, H. (2020). Audit of pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis usage in elective surgical procedures in two teaching hospitals, Islamabad, Pakistan: An observational cross-sectional study. PloS one, 15(4), e0231188.
11. Sattar, A. K., Zahid, N., Shahzad, H., Soomro, R., Saleem, O., & Mahmood, S. F. (2021). Impact of duration of antibiotic prophylaxis on rates of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing mastectomy without immediate reconstruction, comparing a single prophylactic dose versus continued antibiotic prophylaxis postoperatively: a multicentre, double-blinded randomised control trial protocol. BMJ open, 11(7), e049572.
12. Mwita, J. C., Ogunleye, O. O., Olalekan, A., Kalungia, A. C., Kurdi, A., Saleem, Z., ... & Godman, B. (2021). Key issues surrounding appropriate antibiotic use for prevention of surgical site infections in low-and middle-income countries: a narrative review and the implications. International journal of general medicine, 515-530.
13. Rehman, H., Siddiqa, M., Munam, A., & Khan, S. (2020). Frequency of port site wound infection after gall bladder removal with or without retrieval bag in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JPMA, 70(1533).
14. Hassan, B., Ijaz, M., Khan, A., Sands, K., Serfas, G. I., Clayfield, L., ... & Walsh, T. R. (2021). A role for arthropods as vectors of multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales in surgical site infections from South
15. Liu, Z., Dumville, J. C., Norman, G., Westby, M. J., Blazeby, J., McFarlane, E., ... & Cheng, H. Y. (2018). Intraoperative interventions for preventing surgical site infection: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2).
16. Kolasiński, W. (2019). Surgical site infections–review of current knowledge, methods of prevention. Polish journal of surgery, 91(4), 41-47.
17. Rojas-Gutierrez, E., &Vilar-Compte, D. (2019). An overview of surgical site infection in low-and middle-income countries: the role of recent guidelines, limitations, and possible solutions. Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases, 11, 300-316.
18. Campioli, C. C., Challener, D., Comba, I. Y., Shah, A., Wilson, W. R., Sohail, M. R., ... &O’Horo, J. C. (2022). Overview and risk factors for postcraniotomy surgical site infection: a four-year experience. Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology, 2(1), e14.