OUTCOMES AND PREDICTORS OF SUCCESS AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

Main Article Content

Dr. Luqman Asghar
Dr. Muhammad Arsalan
Dr. Farhan Qazi
Dr. Asif Iqbal
Dr. Sajawal Khan
Dr. Absar Khan

Keywords

.

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are the most prevalent and common knee ligament injuries in the world of orthopedics. The purpose of ACL reconstruction is to optimize knee biomechanics of the patient so that he can return to demanding sports. Moreover, the aim involves minimizing the risk of further damage to menisci and articular cartilage. This study is aimed at the determining outcomes and predictors of success after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.


Methods: A total of 150 patients were selected randomly in the study. All patients included were between the ages of 17 to 40 and in the category of ‘low risk’ patients. Patients were both males and females. Patients participating in the study were counselled appropriately and a written consent was taken from them. Moreover, patients selected were volunteers and agreed to be part of the study.


Results: Since it was a procedure that had to be done in the operation theatre, specialized anesthesia care was arranged and coordinated with for every procedure. Patients who are young in age tend to adapt well to the ACLR and have decreased complications and increased return-to-activity rates. Moreover, people who have high demanding sports activities have slightly increased risks of complications.

Abstract 72 | pdf Downloads 38

References

1. Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG. Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(10):2321–2328. Medline.
2. Quatman CE, Quatman-Yates CC, Hewett TE. A ‘plane’ explanation of anterior cruciate ligament injury mechanisms: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2010;40:729–746.
3. Serpell BG, Scarvell JM, Ball NB, Smith PN. Mechanisms and risk factors for noncontact ACL injury in age mature athletes who engage in field or court sports: a summary of the literature since 1980. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:3160–3176.
4. Shimokochi Y, Shultz SJ. Mechanisms of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Athl Train. 2008;43:396–408.
5. Marx RG, Jones EC, Angel M, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Beliefs and attitudes of members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(7):762–770. Medline.
6. Gottlob CA, Baker CL, Jr, Pellissier JM, Colvin L. Cost effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:272–282. Medline.
7. Cimino F, Volk BS, Setter D. Anterior cruciate ligament injury: diagnosis, management, and prevention. Am Fam Physician . 2010;82(8):917–922.
8. Sutton KM, Bullock JM. Anterior cruciate ligament rupture: differences between males and females. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21(1):41–50. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-21-01-41
9. Snaebjörnsson T, Svantesson E, Sundemo D, et al. Young age and high BMI are predictors of early revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study from the Swedish and Norwegian knee ligament registries based on 30,747 patients. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(11):3583–3591. doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05487-2
10. Agel J, Rockwood T, Klossner D. Collegiate ACL injury rates across 15 sports. Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26(6):518–523. doi:10.1097/JSM.0000000000000290
11. Ryan J, Magnussen RA, Cox CL, Hurbanek JG, Flanigan DC, Kaeding CC. ACL reconstruction: do outcomes differ by sex? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(6):507–512. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00299
12. Tan SH, Lau BP, Khin LW, Lingaraj K. The importance of patient sex in the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(1):242–254. doi:10.1177/0363546515573008