LEVEL OF SATISFACTION AMONG PATIENTS WEARING MAXILLARY COMPLETE DENTURE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Maxillary complete dentures, Satisfaction, Closed mouth impression, Open mouth impression
Abstract
Objective: To compare level of satisfaction among patients wearing maxillary complete denture using closed and open mouth impression.
Methodology: Seventy patients with endetulism were selected and divided in two equal groups, group A had maxillary complete denture using closed mouth impression while group B had maxillary complete denture using open mouth impression. Level of satisfaction was assessed between both groups.
Results: It was notable that 24 (68.6%) patients in group A were very satisfied with denture comfort, while 12 (34.3%) in group B were moderately satisfied. (P = 0.01). Speech satisfaction was similar between groups (P = 0.39). Despite no notable difference in mastication satisfaction, 26 (74.3%) patients in group B were very satisfied with its efficiency, whereas 13 (37.1%) in group A were moderately satisfied (P = 0.06). A notable difference was found between 28 (80%) patients in group A and 18 (51.4%) in group B in denture retention satisfaction (P = 0.03). Denture satisfaction was similar in both groups.
Conclusion: Maxillary full dentures created with closed mouth impression technique are better than open mouth approach for comfort, denture retention, and speech quality, but overall satisfaction was not different.
References
2. Guglielmotti MB, Olmedo DG, Cabrini RL. Research on implants and osseointegration. Periodontology 2000. 2019;79(1):178-89.
3. Goswami R, Pahwa A, Saxena D, Chopra A. Orofacial Rehabilitation with Implants: A Boon for Retention. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology. 2022;26(01):1451-8.
4. Mohammad S. Dental implants. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2017;8(2):87-88.
5. Goswami M, Chauhan N. Prosthetic Management with Removable Partial Dentures in Pediatric Dental Care: Case Series. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2023;16(3):534.
6. Faraone KL, Garrett PH, Romberg E. A blended learning approach to teaching pre‐clinical complete denture prosthodontics. European Journal of Dental Education. 2013;17(1):e22-7.
7. Cheng AC, Koticha TN, Tee-Khin N, Wee AG. Prosthodontic management of an irradiated maxillectomy patient with severe trismus using implant-supported prostheses: a clinical report. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2008;99(5):344-50.
8. Wadhwani CP, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Raigrodski AJ. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2005;93(6):530-9.
9. Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental impression materials and techniques. Dental Clinics. 2017;61(4):779-96.
10. Schaefer O, Schmidt M, Goebel R, Kuepper H. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2012;108(3):165-72.
11. Alsharbaty MH, Alikhasi M, Zarrati S, Shamshiri AR. A clinical comparative study of 3‐dimensional accuracy between digital and conventional implant impression techniques. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;28(4):902-8.
12. Jabeen B, Samejo I, Hasan SM, Khan A, Ilyas Y. Post insertion complaints associated with new complete denture. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2018;38(1):127-9.
13. Farias-Neto A, Carreiro Ada F. Changes in patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency during adaptation to new dentures. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(3):174-177.
14. Yamaga E., Sato Y., Minakuchi S. A structural equation model relating oral condition, denture quality, chewing ability, satisfaction, and oral health-related quality of life in complete denture wearers. J Dent . 2013;41(8):710–717.
15. Guéders A, Geerts S. Relationship between Operator Skill and In Vitro Microleakage of Different Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations. ISRN Dent. 2011;2011:285624.
16. Sghaireen MG, Al-Omiri MK. Relationship between impact of maxillary anterior fixed prosthodontic rehabilitation on daily living, satisfaction, and personality profiles. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(2):170-6.
17. Tasleem R, Fahimullah SH, Rahim S, Akram S, Abouzeid HL, Elmahdi AE, Yaqoob A, Alshahrani RS. Effect of Impression Technique on Denture Retention and Patient Satisfaction: A Comparative Clinical Study. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2023;17(02):524-527.
18. Nukazawa S. Difference between Provider Centric Approach and Patient Centric Approach in Complete Denture Impression. Journal of the Academy of Clinical Dentistry. 2009; 29:18-26.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dr Waheed Murad
BDS, MSc, PhD Assistant Professor Science Of Dental Materials, Bibi Aseefa Dental College SMBB Medical University Larkana, Pakistan
Dr Uzma Bashir
BDS, MSc Prosthodontics, Assistant professor Prosthodontics Muhammad Dental College ibn-e-Sina University Mirpurkhas, Pakistan
Dr Naveed Ahmed Memon
BDS, MSc Operative Dentistry, Senior Lecturer, Science of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, Liaquat University Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro Hyderabad, Pakistan
Dr Farina Qureshi
BDS.. Lecture Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Liaquat University Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro Hyderabad, Pakistan
Dr Sana Javed
BDS, M.Phil Assistant professor, Oral Biology Faculty of Dentistry, Liaquat University Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro Hyderabad, Pakistan
Dr Mahrukh
BDS, MSc, (Prosthodontics), Dental Surgeon, Dental Department Bhitai Dental and Medical College Mirpurkhas, Pakistan