OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY VERSUS DYE ANGIOGRAPHY IN POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL VASCULOPATHY

Main Article Content

Dr.Vibha Pal
Dr.Ravinath Goud Marepally
Dr.Jyoti D Garg
Dr. M B Thirumalesh
Dr.Naresh Kumar Yadav

Keywords

Idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (IPCV), choroidal neovascularization (CNV), Branching venous networks (BVNs), pigment epithelial detachments (PED)

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) could be a valid tool to detect polyps and branching vascular network (BVN) in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) and thus allowing the analysis of the type, the morphology, and the extension of BVN in most of the cases.


Purpose - To determine the sensitivity and specificity of OCTA in detecting polyp and especially BVN, compared to fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA).


 


Methods -  It is a prospective observational study. Patients with suspected PCV were recruited and underwent FFA, ICGA, and OCTA (AngioVue, Optovue, Inc.). Sensitivity and specificity of FA, with ICGA, were assessed and compared with OCTA.


 


Results – Fifty-four eyes were included clinically consecutively. Out of which, forty-three  eyes of 36 patients were studied after confirmation by gold standard ICGA investigation . On ICGA ,21 eyes showed polyp and  16 eyes with polyp with BVN and  6 eyes with BVN only .Sensitivity of OCTA was 88% and specificity was 90%. Concordance between FA/ICGA and OCTA was very good for BVN (0.91; range 0.81–1.00).


Conclusions - OCTA showed high sensitivity and specificity for detection of BVN. Concordance between OCTA and gold-standard dye-based techniques was excellent. OCTA may represent a first-line noninvasive method for the diagnosis of BVN in PCV patients.

Abstract 77 | pdf Downloads 33

References

1. Stern RM, Zakov ZN, Zegarra H et al. Multiple recurrent serosanguineous retinal pigment epithelial detachments in black women. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 100:560–9.
2. Yannuzzi LA, Ciardella A, Spaide RF, Rabb M, Freund KB et al. The expanding clinical spectrum of idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115:478–85.
3. Kleiner RC, Brucker AJ, Johnston RL et al. The posterior uveal bleeding syndrome. Retina. 1990; 10:9–17.
4. Sho K, Takahashi K, Yamada H et al. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: Incidence, demographic features, and clinical characteristics. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121:1392–6.
5. Imamura Y, Engelbert M, Iida T et al. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a review. SurvOphthalmol 2010; 55(6): 501–515.
6. Sato T, Kishi S, Watanabe G et al. Tomographic features of branching vascular networks in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Retina. 2007; 27(5):589–594.
7. Inoue M, Balaratnasingam C, Freund K et al.Optical coherence tomography Angiography of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and Polypoidal choroidal Neovascularization retina, J of retinal and vitreous diseases 2015;35(11).
8. Kim DY, Fingler J, Zawadzki RJ et al. Optical imaging of the chorioretinal vasculature in the living human eye. ProcNatlAcad Sci. 2013; 110:14354–9.
9. Kuehlewein L,Bansal M ,Lenis TL et al . Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of Type 1 in Neovasculariozation in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Am J Ophthalmology. 2015;160 (4):739-48.
10. Souedan V, Souied EH, Caillaux V et al.Sensitivity and Specificity of optical coherence tomography angiography for detection of choroidal neovascularization in real life practice and varying retinal expertise level. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(3) : 1051-1060.
11. Yannuzzi LA, Wong DW, Sforzolini BS: Polypoida lchoroidal vasculopathy and neovascularized age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1503–10.