EFFICACY OF ORAL BRUSH CYTOLOGY IN THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ORAL POTENTIALLY MALIGNANT LESIONS A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY

Main Article Content

Dr.Bharath B
Dr Balaguhan B
Dr. Karthikeyan G R
Dr. Vincy Flora

Keywords

.

Abstract

Background: Incidence of oral cancers and oral premalignant lesions is very high in this current technological world and also transformation into oral malignant carcinoma is erratic in patients with potentially pre - malignant lesions of the oral cavity. Tissue biopsies are needed for the current management in order to characterize the histology, grade dysplasia, and focus intervention for "high risk" lesions; however, there are few evidence-based guidelines and diagnostics available in which some non invasive techniques plays major role in early diagnosis of oral potentially malignant lesions.  


Aim and objectives: Evaluating the efficacy of brush biopsy in early diagnosis of potentially malignant lesions by using brush border biopsy.


Methods: 30 individuals with deleterious habits were instituted for Oral brush samples using smear brushes from all participants after the detailed clinical history taken. Cytology smear were prepared for all samples and assessed for dysplastic features.


Results:  A significant association was observed between the cytological assessments of oral brush cytology samples and the histopathological diagnosis. In addition, there was a significant inverse correlation between the grade of oral epithelial dysplasia. The diagnostic accuracy of this approach was outstanding between the presence or absence of oral epithelial dysplasia and other malignant atypia.


Conclusion: This approach presents a minimally invasive, highly accurate and non-technically demanding method for the surveillance of oral potentially malignant disorders.

Abstract 89 | PDF Downloads 32

References

1. Evaluation of brush cytology and DNA image cytometry for the detection of cancer of the oral cavity. Diagn Cytopathol 2016; 44(3): 201-5
2. Efficacy of Oral Brush Biopsy in Potentially Malignant Disorder Management M L Goodson1,2 D R Smith2 P J Thomson1 Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Oral Health Centre, Queensland 4006, Australia. 2Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia, 79200 Iskandar Puteri, Johor, Malaysia.
3. Thomson PJ, Sloan P, Wadehra V, Robinson CM, Johnson SJ, Mowatt A, Goodson ML. Diagnostic adjunctive techniques and the management of oral potentially malignant disorders. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology 2015 119: e212
4. Swati Gupta, Jigna S. Shah1 , Shilpa Parikh1 , Piyush Limbdiwala1 , Sumit Goel., Clinical correlative study on early detection of oral cancer and precancerous lesions by modified oral brush biopsy and cytology followed by histopathology. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics - April-June 2014 - Volume 10 - Issue 2.
5. Swati Gupta, Jigna S. Shah1 , Shilpa Parikh1 , Piyush Limbdiwala1 , Sumit Goel., Clinical correlative study on early detection of oral cancer and precancerous lesions by modified oral brush biopsy and cytology followed by histopathology. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics - April-June 2014 - Volume 10 - Issue 2.
6. Goodson ML, Sloan P, Wadehra V, Johnson SJ, Robinson CM, Aubourg G, Thomson PJ. Orcellex® brush biopsy and liquid -based cytology – assessment of a new diagnostic technique in oral potentially malignant disorder management. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2014 Photon 117: 224 -231.
7. Alsarraf, A.; Kujan, O.; Farah, C.S. Liquid-based oral brush cytology in the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia using a modified Bethesda Cytology system. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2018
8. Driemel O, Kunkel M, Hullmann M, Kleinsasser N, Staudenmaier R, Muller-Richter U, et al. Performance of conventional oral brush biopsies. HNO 2008;56:205-10.
9. Remmerbach TW, Weidenbach H, Pomjanski N, Knops K, Mathes S, Hemprich A, et al. Cytologic and DNA-cytometric early diagnosis of oral cancer. Anal Cell Pathol 2001;22:211-21.
10. Scheifele C, Schmidt-Westhausen AM, Dietrich T, Reichart A. The sensitivity and specificity of the OralCDx technique: evaluation of 103 cases. Oral Oncol 2004;40:824-8.
11. Thomson PJ, Goodson ML, Booth C, Cragg N, Hamadah O. Predicting recurrence after treatment of oral precancer: Use of cell cycle analysis. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2008 46: 370 -375.
12. Mehrotra R, Gupta A, Singh M, Ibrahim R. Application of cytology and molecular biology in diagnosing premalignant or malignant oral lesions. Mol Cancer 2006; 5: 11.
13. Sciubba JJ. Improving detection of precancerous and cancerous oral lesions: Computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy. U.S. Collaborative OralCDx Study Group. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1445-57.
14. Nichols ML, Quinn FB Jr, Schnadig VJ, Zaharopoulos P, Hokanson JA, Des Jardins L, et al. Interobserver variability in the interpretation of brush cytologic studies from head and neck lesions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:1350-5.