OUTCOME OF INDUCING WOMEN APPEARING AT TERM WITH PREMATURE RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES (PROM) SOONER (BEFORE 6 HOURS) VS LATER (AFTER 12 HOURS)

Main Article Content

Dr Sana Ghaffar Bajwa
Dr Hina Mushtaq
Dr Nida Arif
Dr Sobia Haneef
Dr Adnan Mushtaq
Dr Sabah Talib Shah

Keywords

At term, Induction of labour, Maternal outcomes, Neonatal outcomes, Premature rupture of membrane

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of inducing women who appear at term with premature rupture of membrane (PROM) sooner (before 6 hours) and later (after 12 hours).


Study design: Randomized controlled trial


Place and duration of study: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, MCH Unit II, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad from July 2023 to June 2024. 


Methods: A total of 140 women aged 18-42 years, parity <5, presenting at gestational age >37 weeks and reported with PROM were enrolled in this study and divided in to 2 equal groups.  


In group A, patients were given induction of labor immediately after presentation (within 6 hours) while in Group B patients were given induction of labor late (after 12 hours) by instillation of 3mg tablet PGE2 (dinoprostone) in the posterior fornix.


The comparison of outcomes between the 2 methods was done by applying chi-square test and independent t-test where p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Results: The Mean±SD of age in this study was 27.84±5.66 years.  The results of the study outcomes show that there was significantly less PROM to delivery interval (13.96±5.83 Vs 24.40±7.59 respectively, p=0.00), significantly more spontaneous delivery (70% Vs 50% respectively, p= 0.04) in Group A compared to Group B. The results of neonatal outcomes show significantly better APGAR score at 1 min (7.16±1.07 Vs 6.84±0.68 respectively, p=0.04) as well as at 5 min (7.89±1.46 Vs 7.45±1.01 respectively, p=0.04) and thereby significantly less number of neonates to be admitted in NICU (25.7% Vs 51.43% respectively, p=0.03) in Group A compared to group B.


Conclusion: For women presenting at term with PROM, sooner inductions are more effective than later inductions by providing better maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Abstract 67 | pdf Downloads 22

References

1. Gupta S, Ganatra H. A comparative study on premature rupture of membranes at term: Immediate induction with PGE2 gel vs delayed induction with oxytocin. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;3(3):15-8. DOI: 10.33545/gynae.2019.v3.i3a.05
2. Dayal S, Hong PL. Premature Rupture of Membranes. [Updated 2023 Jul 17]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532888/
3. Zhuang L, Li ZK, Zhu YF, Ju R, Hua SD, Yu CZ, et al. Latency period of PROM at term and the risk of neonatal infectious diseases. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):12275. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16593-6.
4. Devillard E, Delabaere A, Rouzaire M, Pereira B, Accoceberry M, Houlle C, et al. Induction of labour in case of premature rupture of membranes at term with an unfavourable cervix: protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing double balloon catheter (+oxytocin) and vaginal prostaglandin (RUBAPRO) treatments. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e026090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026090.
5. Hingoro SAS, Rizwan N, Qazi RA. Maternal outcome of early intervention in women with prom at term (37 weeks or more). J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(3):334-6.
6. Kulhan NG, Kulhan M. Labor induction in term nulliparous women with premature rupture of membranes: oxytocin versus dinoprostone. Arch Med Sci. 2019;15(4):896-901.
7. Middleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V, McBain RD, Crowther CA. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1(1):CD005302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005302.pub3.
8. Liu H, Yin H, Zhang H, Zhu H, Hu R, Gu W. Dinoprostone pessary for labor induction in Chinese patients with premature rupture of membranes at term: A retrospective cohort. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(7):2356-2362. doi: 10.1111/jog.14749.
9. Sargunam PN, Bak LLM, Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Noor Azmi MA, Zaidi SN, et al. Induction of labor compared to expectant management in term nulliparas with a latent phase of labor of more than 8 hours: a randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2602-2.
10. Agnes JMB, Lavanya S. Two-year comparative study on immediate versus delayed induction in term premature rupture of membranes.Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7:94-8.
11. Awkadigwe FI, Ezugwu FO, Eleje GU, Nweze SO, Odugu BU, Dinwoke VO, et al. Active versus expectant management for premature rupture of membranes at term: A randomized, controlled study. J Int Med Res. 2023;51(8):3000605231195451. doi: 10.1177/03000605231195451.
12. Mukharya J, Mukharya S. Comparative study of fetal and maternal outcomes of prelabour rupture of membranes at term. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:149-63.
13. Sheeraz S, Memon FP, Zaheen Z, Planned early birth versus expectant management for prelabour rupture of membranes at term. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci. 2020;16(3):148-152.
14. Zia MS, Shaheen M, Haneef S, Nasir GM. Comparison of Active and Expectant Management for Fetomatenal Outcome Among Women Presenting with Premature Rupture of Membrane at Term. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak. 2022; 12(2):125-29.
15. Sohail A, Mahum, Muzaffar T, Saleem U, Tahir AM, Hafiz Z. Outcome of early and late induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2022;72(6):2087-90.
16. Bellussi F, Seidenari A, Juckett L, Di Mascio D, Berghella V. Induction within or after 12 hours of ≥36 weeks' prelabor rupture of membranes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3(5):100425. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100425.