"HISTOPATHOLOGICAL PATTERNS OF PROSTATIC LESIONS: INSIGHTS FROM A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY.”

Main Article Content

Dr. Gaikwad S.L.
Dr. Gode P.R.
Dr. Bagate A.N.
Dr. Kamble N. G.

Keywords

Prostate cancer, Histopathology, BPH

Abstract

Background: The prostate, a vital component of the male reproductive system enveloping the urethra, is susceptible to several prevalent conditions such as inflammatory lesions, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and prostate cancer. Our study aimed to analyse diverse histopathological patterns associated with prostatic lesions, thereby elucidating their intricate pathology and clinical significance.


Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at Department of Pathology, Swami Ramanand Teerth Rural Government medical college, Ambajogai, Maharashtra, India. over an 18-month period focused on analysing histopathological patterns of prostatic lesions. The gross specimens were in the form of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The histopathological procedure involved fixation, staining, and examination for cellular characteristics using 10% formalin, alcohol, xylol, haematoxylin, eosin, and DPX mounting medium, along with surgical tools. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics Version 25.


Results:  The Present study included 25 TURP specimens, 84% showed benign lesions, while 16% were malignant. Average age of the patients was 61.96 ± 7.8 years. Gleason's scoring revealed a predominance of scores 7 and 8 in malignant cases. Adenocarcinoma constituted 16% of diagnoses, The majority of cases (60%) were diagnosed with BPH with chronic prostatitis and 24% were BPH without prostatitis.


Conclusion: The study highlights the prevalence of benign lesions in prostatic specimens obtained through transurethral resection, with a notable incidence of adenocarcinoma. The predominance of Gleason scores 7 and 8 underscores the importance of accurate histopathological analysis in diagnosing and managing prostate cancer.

Abstract 79 | PDF Downloads 31

References

1. Verze P, Cai T, Lorenzetti S. The role of the prostate in male fertility, health and disease. Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Jul;13(7):379–86. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.89
2. Attard G, Parker C, Eeles RA, Schröder F, Tomlins SA, Tannock I, et al. Prostate cancer. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016 Jan 2;387(10013):70–82. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61947-4
3. Rawla P. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J Oncol. 2019 Apr;10(2):63–89. DOI: 10.14740/wjon1191
4. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209–49. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660
5. Mbbs VK. Robbins and Cotran PATHOLOGIC BASIS OF DISEASE. URL: https://ia903008.us.archive.org/32/items/bazbazbaz1/PathologyRobbins7ed.pdf
6. Rosai J. Rosai and Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011. 2767 p. URL: https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Rosai_and_Ackerman_s_Surgical_Pathology.html?id=1CKX7aGBbUsC&redir_esc=y
7. Robbins SL, Kumar V, Cotran RS. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease [Internet]. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010 [cited 2024 Mar 2]. 1450 p. (Robbins Pathology). Available from: http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/bookChapter/3-s2.0-B9781437707 922X50019
8. Wang G, Shen D. [Impact of International Association of Urological Pathology Gleason scoring system on prostatic carcinoma grading: a preliminary analysis of 185 cases]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;43(10):677–9. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2014.10.007
9. Zelic R, Giunchi F, Fridfeldt J, Carlsson J, Davidsson S, Lianas L, et al. Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade. Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 18;14:59–70. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S339140
10. Bhatta S, Hirachan S. Prostatic lesions: Histopathological study in a tertiary care hospital. J Manmohan Meml Inst Health Sci. 2018 Sep 22;4:12. DOI: 10.3126/jmmihs.v4i1.21133
11. Issac AS, Varughese AA, Raghuveer CV, P AS, K P, Majeed NA, et al. A Clinicopathological Analysis of 120 Cases of Prostate Biopsies and Their Correlation with Prostate Specific Antigen levels. Ann Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Nov 28;5(11):A882-887. DOI: 10.21276/APALM.2237
12. Mahajan S, Jandial A, Bhardwaj S. Histopathological Spectrum of Lesions Observed in Prostate Specimens - An Institutional Experience. JK Sci J Med Educ Res. 2023 Oct 10;25(4):214–7. URL: https://journal.jkscience.org/index.php/JK-Science/article/view/221
13. Garalla HM, Darraz KMA, Essa MMA. A Retroprospective Clinicopathological Study of Prostatic Lesions in Surgical Specimens. Libyan Int Med Univ J. 2022 Jul;07(02):051–6. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759622
14. Puttaswamy K, Parthiban R, Shariff S. Histopathological Study of Prostatic Biopsies in Men with Prostatism. J Med Sci Health. 2016 Apr 1;2(1):11–7. DOI: 10.46347/jmsh.2016.v02i01.003
15. Chauhan SC, Sarvaiya AN. Study of clinicomorphologic spectrum of prostatic lesions and correlation with prostate specific antigen levels in a tertiary care center. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 4(2):328–32. DOI: 10.18231/2394-6792.2017.0067
16. Joshee DA. The histomorphological study of prostate lesions. DOI: 10.9790/0853-141188589
17. Nwafor CC, Keshinro OS, Abudu EK. A histopathological study of prostate lesions in Lagos, Nigeria: A private practice experience. Niger Med J J Niger Med Assoc. 2015;56(5):338–43. DOI: 10.4103/0300-1652.170388
18. Deshmukh BD, Ramteerthakar NA, Sulhyan KR. Histopathological Study of Lesions of Prostate - A Five Year Study. Int J Health Sci. 2014;(1). URL: https://www.ijhsr. org/ IJHSR_ Vol.4_Issue.1_Jan2014/1.pdf