EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF SPINAL AND GENERAL ANESTHESIA ON NEONATAL APGAR SCORES IN ELECTIVE CAESAREAN DELIVERIES
Main Article Content
Keywords
Apgar score, anesthesia, spinal, general, newborns
Abstract
Objective
To compare the impact of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia on neonatal Apgar scores in patients undergoing elective cesarean sections.
Methodology
This study conducted at the Departments of Anesthesia, District Headquarter Hospital Parachinar and Mahmood Hospital Parachinar, from August 2023 to April 2024, investigated the impact of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia on neonatal Apgar scores in 110 ASA II patients with normal pregnancies and no comorbidities, undergoing elective Cesarean sections. Participants were assigned to receive either spinal anesthesia (Group I) or general anesthesia (Group II) – based on their personal preferences. Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes post-delivery were the primary outcomes measured. Statistical analysis showed significant differences favoring spinal anesthesia in terms of Apgar scores. Ethical standards were rigorously followed, with approval from the Ethics Board and informed consent from all participants.
Results This study compared neonatal outcomes between 110 patients undergoing cesarean section under either general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia. Demographic characteristics including age, height, weight, gestational age, and fetal weight were well-matched between groups. Surgery time was shorter in the spinal anesthesia group (53.2 vs. 56.9 minutes), while anesthesia duration was similar. Infants born under spinal anesthesia had significantly higher Apgar scores at 1 minute (8.05 vs. 7.15) and 5 minutes (9.30 vs. 8.90) compared to those born under general anesthesia (p < 0.001). A greater percentage of infants in the spinal anesthesia group achieved Apgar scores of 7 and above (96.4% vs. 83.6%) with fewer scoring below 7 (3.6% vs. 16.4%) compared to the general anesthesia group.
Conclusion Based on the study's results, spinal anesthesia emerges as a superior choice in elective cesarean sections, associated with higher Apgar scores and greater maternal satisfaction compared to general anesthesia.
References
2. Sung, T. Y., Jee, Y. S., You, H. J., & Cho, C. K. (2021). Comparison of the effect of general and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section on maternal and fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Anesthesia and pain medicine, 16(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.20072
3. Algert, C. S., Bowen, J. R., Giles, W. B., Knoblanche, G. E., Lain, S. J., & Roberts, C. L. (2009). Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: a population-based study. BMC medicine, 7, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-7-20
4. Morris, M. T., Morris, J., Wallace, C., Cho, W., Sharan, A., Abouelrigal, M., & Joseph, V. (2019). An Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery in Various Hospital Settings. Global spine journal, 9(4), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218795867
5. Li, X., Jiang, X., & Zhao, P. (2021). Effects of Pregnancy Anesthesia on Fetal Nervous System. Frontiers in pharmacology, 11, 523514. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.523514
6. Gwanzura, C., Gavi, S., Mangiza, M., Moyo, F. V., Lohman, M. C., Nhemachena, T., & Chipato, T. (2023). Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section. BMC anesthesiology, 23(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02098-w
7. Chassard D. (2017). Mortalité maternelle liée à l’anesthésie-réanimation. Résultats de l’ENCMM, France 2010–2012 [Maternal deaths due to anesthesia complications. Results from the French confidential enquiry into maternal deaths, 2010-2012]. Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie, 45(12S), S54–S57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2017.10.028
8. Azemati, S., Zarghami, A., Jouybar, R., & Naderi-Boldaji, V. (2022). Analgesic Characteristics of Bupivacaine Alone and in Combination with Dexmedetomidine or Meperidine in Spinal Anesthesia during Cesarean Section: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Study. Pain research & management, 2022, 5111214. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5111214
9. Agarwal, A., & Kishore, K. (2009). Complications and controversies of regional anaesthesia: a review. Indian journal of anaesthesia, 53(5), 543–553.
10. Ozden, M. G. N., Koruk, S., Collak, Z., & Panik, N. (2023). Comparison of the effects of general and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery on maternal and fetal outcomes: A retrospective analysis of data. Northern clinics of Istanbul, 10(5), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.25593
11. Lim, G., Facco, F. L., Nathan, N., Waters, J. H., Wong, C. A., & Eltzschig, H. K. (2018). A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. Anesthesiology, 129(1), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002182
12. Kostro, M., Jacyna, N., Głuszczak-Idziakowska, E., Sułek-Kamas, K., Jakiel, G., & Wilińska, M. (2018). Factors affecting the differentiation of the Apgar score and the biochemical correlation of fetal well-being - a prospective observational clinical study. Developmental period medicine, 22(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.34763/devperiodmed.20182203.238246
13. Wallace, D. H., Leveno, K. J., Cunningham, F. G., Giesecke, A. H., Shearer, V. E., & Sidawi, J. E. (1995). Randomized comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia. Obstetrics and gynecology, 86(2), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00139-i
14. Dharmalingam, T. K., & Ahmad Zainuddin, N. A. (2013). Survey on maternal satisfaction in receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 20(3), 51–54.
15. Idris, I. M., Weldegiorgis, G. G., & Tesfamariam, E. H. (2020). Maternal Satisfaction and Its Associated Factors towards Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section: A Cross-Sectional Study in Two Eritrean Hospitals. Anesthesiology research and practice, 2020, 5025309. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5025309
16. Ateeyah HM, ElkadyMA, Mostafa MH, Mohamed MH. Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing caesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2018 Jul 1;72(7):4856-65.
17. Badheka JP, Oza VP, Vyas A, Baria D, Nehra P, Babu T. Comparison of fractionated dose versus bolus dose injection in spinal anaesthesia for patients undergoing elective caesarean section: A randomised, double-blind study. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;61(1):55.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dr Mehdi Hussain
Head of Department, Department of Anesthesia, DHQ Hospital Parachinar, Pakistan
Dr Ijaz Hussain
Registrar Anesthesia, NWGH Peshawar, Pakistan
Dr Muhammad Adil Jadoon
Registrar Anesthesia, Jinnah Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan