VALIDATION OF ULTRASOUND FOR PERFORMING CAUDAL EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTIONS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Caudal epidural, ultrasound, sacral hiatus, sacral cornua, low back pain, fluoroscopy
Abstract
Introduction: Primary aim of this study was to use ultrasound for performing caudal epidural injections, as ultrasound can provide the clear images of the sacral structures like sacral cornuas and sacral hiatus and can detect the anatomic variations of the sacrum and sacral hiatus that make caudal epidural injection difficult or impossible. And thus to validate ultrasound for performing caudal epidural injections. Performing Caudal epidural injections solely under the C-Arm guidance carries more risk of radiation hazard as many a times multiple X-Rays are required while performing this procedure. In this method we used ultrasound guidance to identify caudal structures and to insert and advance the needle in sacral hiatus, as well as to observe turbulence of the injected contrast agent in the sacral canal, but final confirmation of correct placement of needle and filling of contrast agent in epidural space was done in fluoroscopic view.
Materials and Methods: This was an observational case study. 32 patients (16 male and 16 female patients) with low back pain posted for caudal epidural steroid injection as per the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Ultrasound images of the sacral hiatus and bilateral cornua were obtained by a real-time linear array transducer. Under the ultrasonography guidance wede fined the procedure successful if the needle was visualised in sacral hiatus, and turbulence of injected contrast agent in the sacral canal observed and with fluoroscopic view correct placement of needle and filling of epidural space with contrast agent was confirmed.
Results: The epidurogram showed that the injection was successful in 31 out of 32 patients. In only 1 out of 32 patients filling of contrast agent was not seen in fluoroscopic view. The mean distance between bilateral sacral cornua of all 32 patients was found to be 18.30 ± 0.96 mm, the mean distance between anterior and posterior wall of sacral hiatus apex area of all 32 patients were found to be 2.93±0.42 mm. In 1 patient in which the filing of contrast agent in epidural space was not seen on fluoroscopic view, distance between the anterior and posterior wall of sacral hiatus in apex area was 1.80 mm which was smallest among all 32 patients. And the distance between bilateral sacral cornua were 18.60 mm. The mean of Body Mass Index (BMI) was found to 26.79± 3.54.
Conclusion: In conclusion, ultrasound could be safe and reliable modality to observe anatomic variations of sacral hiatus and to perform caudal epidural injections.
References
2. Hazra AK, Bhattacharya D, Mukherjee S, Ghosh S, Mitra M, Mandal M. Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Indian J Anaesth 2016;60:388-92.
3. Ibrahim Burakb Atci, Serdal Albayrak, Emre Durdag, Omer Ayden. Caudal Epidural Steroid Application at Chronic Low Back and Leg Pain: Experience of Fifty Cases and the Anaysis of Pain and Satisfaction of the Cases. J Neurol Res. 2013;3(6):173-178.
4. Wazir Fahad Jan et al. A Study on management of lumbar disc disease with caudal epidural steroid injection. JMSCR 2019 April;Volume 07:154-159.
5. Elashmawy et al. Caudal epidural steroid injection ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided in treatment of refractory lumbar disc prolapse with radiculopathy. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (2020)51:259