AN OBSERVER TOOL TO ENHANCE LEARNING OF MEDICAL STUDENTS DURING SIMULATION TRAINING OF CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Main Article Content
Keywords
Simulation Training, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Observer Tool
Abstract
Background: In cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), simulation training plays a vital part of medical education, but there is limited time of active practice due to large class sizes, resulting in a small learning effect. A tool called an observer tool (OT) is a checklist which summarizes CPR skills and actions stepwise, has been proposed to improve learning during observation.
Objective: To evaluate the importance of an OT in improving the learning outcome of medical students during simulation training of CPR.
Methodology: The study design was prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Kabir Medical College, Gandhara University in a time span of February 2022 to February 2023. The sample size was 200 and these medical students were randomized into two groups: OT+ (using the observer tool) and OT- (without the observer tool). OT checklist assessed the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included non-technical skills (NTS) scores, chest compression quality, knowledge scores (MCQ), perceived improvement in skills, and satisfaction levels.
Results: A significantly higher global performance score was of OT+ group (25.2 ± 0.9) compared to the OT- group (24.6 ± 1.3, p = 0.001). The OT+ group also showed significant improvements in chest compression quality (96% vs. 91%, p = 0.032), knowledge scores (19.2 ± 1.3 vs. 17.5 ± 1.6, p = 0.003), and perceived improvement in skills (4.7 ± 0.5 vs. 4.4 ± 0.6, p = 0.023). No significant differences were observed in NTS scores (p = 0.224) and satisfaction levels (p = 0.139).
Conclusion: An observer tool significantly improve the performance of medical students globally. Notable improvements were seen in participants using observer tool in chest compression quality, knowledge scores, and perceived skill improvement. However, no significant differences were seen in non-technical skills and overall satisfaction, the results suggest that structured observation can effectively enhance certain aspects of CPR training. These findings highlight the potential of observer tools to improve specific learning outcomes, representing their value in medical education.
References
2. Lee J, Lee W, Lee YJ, Sim H, Lee WK. Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in improving the survival and neurological recovery of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide patient cohort study. Plos one. 2020 Dec 16;15(12):e0243757.
3. Xie B, Liu H, Alghofaili R, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Lobo FD, Li C, Li W, Huang H, Akdere M, Mousas C. A review on virtual reality skill training applications. Frontiers in Virtual Reality. 2021 Apr 30;2:645153.
4. Comings JP. Persistence: Helping adult education students reach their goals. InReview of Adult Learning and Literacy, Volume 7 2023 May 31 (pp. 23-46). Routledge.
5. Tabatabai S. Simulations and virtual learning supporting clinical education during the COVID 19 pandemic. Advances in medical education and practice. 2020 Aug 5:513-6.
6. Groenier M, Brummer L, Bunting BP, Gallagher AG. Reliability of observational assessment methods for outcome-based assessment of surgical skill: systematic review and meta-analyses. Journal of surgical education. 2020 Jan 1;77(1):189-201.
7. Jiang JL, Fu SY, Ma YC, Wang JH, Koo M. Comparative impact of active participation and observation in simulation-based emergency care education on knowledge, learning effectiveness, and satisfaction among undergraduate nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2024 Jul 1;19(3):e566-73.
8. Beattie KL, Hill A, Horswill MS, Grove PM, Stevenson AR. Laparoscopic skills training: the effects of viewing mode (2D vs. 3D) on skill acquisition and transfer. Surgical Endoscopy. 2021 Aug;35:4332-44.
9. Quinn KM, Chen X, Griffiths C, Chen G, Osayi S, Husain S. Skill transference and learning curves in novice learners: a randomized comparison of robotic and laparoscopic platforms. Surgical Endoscopy. 2023 Nov;37(11):8483-8.
10. Varras M, Nikiteas N, Varra VK, Varra FN, Georgiou E, Loukas C. Role of laparoscopic simulators in the development and assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills in laparoscopic surgery and gynecology. World Academy of Sciences Journal. 2020 Mar 1;2(2):65-76.
11. Quinn KM, Chen X, Griffiths C, Chen G, Osayi S, Husain S. Skill transference and learning curves in novice learners: a randomized comparison of robotic and laparoscopic platforms. Surgical Endoscopy. 2023 Nov;37(11):8483-8.
12. Goulamhoussen A, Havard C, Gille B, François B, Benhamou D, Blanié A. An observer tool to enhance learning of medical students during simulation training of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education. 2024 Dec;24(1):1-8.
13. Waliño-Paniagua CN, Gomez-Calero C, Jiménez-Trujillo MI, Aguirre-Tejedor L, Bermejo-Franco A, Ortiz-Gutiérrez RM, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R. Effects of a Game‐Based Virtual Reality Video Capture Training Program Plus Occupational Therapy on Manual Dexterity in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of healthcare engineering. 2019;2019(1):9780587.
14. Lin Y, Cheng A. The role of simulation in teaching pediatric resuscitation: current perspectives. Advances in medical education and practice. 2015 Mar 31:239-48.
15. McCoy IA. Work Engagement Outcomes in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Management’s Role in Supporting Job and Career Development (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland University College).
16. Dewolf P, Clarebout G, Wauters L, Van Kerkhoven J, Verelst S. The effect of teaching nontechnical skills in advanced life support: a systematic review. AEM education and training. 2021 Jul;5(3):e10522.
17. Müller C, Mildenberger T, Steingruber D. Learning effectiveness of a flexible learning study programme in a blended learning design: why are some courses more effective than others?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2023 Feb 17;20(1):10.