EFFECT OF NEURO-DEVELOPMENTAL ABDOMINAL ACTIVATION ON GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION AND MUSCLE TONE IN SPASTIC DIAPLEGIC CEREBRAL PALSY CHILDREN
Main Article Content
Keywords
Cerebral palsy (CP), Gross motor function measures (GMFM), Interrupted direct current (IDC)
Abstract
Background: Cerebral palsy is the static encephalopathy with primary lesion not progressive and secondary problems may change according to the development of brain. Spasticity is the most common problem related to CP. Bobath therapy is a facilitation technique that was used to activate muscles, improve gross motor functions and to reduce spasticity.
Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine the influence of the effects of abdominal activation as to determine the change in gross motor function and reduction in muscle tone.
Methods and Methodology: A quantitative, randomize clinical trial was conducted allocating patients randomly into two groups. One was control group (G1) and the other was treatment group (G2). Baseline treatment was given to the control group which included lower limb passive stretching exercises and interrupted direct Current (IDC). However, baseline treatment with Bobath (facilitation) technique was given to the treatment group for Abdominal Muscle Activation. The measuring tool used for assessment was GMFS 88 to check motor functions of lower limb, GMFS for gross motor function, Modified Ashworth scale to analyze spasticity.
Results: The study showed significant improvements in gross motor functions and reductions in spasticity in children with diaplegic cerebral palsy. For Gross Motor Functional Scale the treatment group improved significantly (mean difference 1.541, p-value 0.000). For Modified Ashworth Scale the treatment group showed significant improvement (mean difference 2.761, p-value 0.000). In Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) significant improvement was observed in the treatment group (mean difference 3.928, p-value 0.000). Pre- and post-treatment comparisons revealed that neuro-developmental techniques effectively enhanced motor function and reduced muscle tone in the participants over the course of 8 weeks.
Conclusion: The study showed significant improvement in gross motor functions and decrease in spasticity of lower limb in children with cerebral palsy.
References
2. Ahmed M, Abd El Azeim FH, Abd El Raouf E. The problem solving strategy of poor core stability in children with cerebral palsy: a clinical trial. J Pediatr Neonatal Care. 2014;1(6):1-6.
3. Desouzart G. Physiotherapy intervention according to the Bobath concept in a clinical case of cerebral palsy. Orthop Res Online J. 2018;3:264-6.
4. Mockford M, Caulton JM. The pathophysiological basis of weakness in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2010;22(2):222-33.
5. Roy S, Alves-Pinto A, Lampe R. Characteristics of Lower leg muscle activity in patients with cerebral palsy during cycling on an ergometer. BioMed research international. 2018;2018(1):6460981.
6. Palisano RJ, Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, Russell DJ, Walter SD, Wood EP, et al. Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Physical therapy. 2000;80(10):974-85.
7. Robb JE, Brunner R. Orthopaedic management of cerebral palsy. Children's orthopaedics and fractures. 2009:307-25.
8. Joffe JR. The effect of functional electrical stimulation on abdominal muscle strength and gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy a randomised control trial. 2014.
9. Bar-Haim S, Harries N, Nammourah I, Oraibi S, Malhees W, Loeppky J, et al. Effectiveness of motor learning coaching in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2010;24(11):1009-20.
10. de Graaf-Peters VB, Blauw-Hospers CH, Dirks T, Bakker H, Bos AF, Hadders-Algra M. Development of postural control in typically developing children and children with cerebral palsy: possibilities for intervention? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2007;31(8):1191-200.
11. Panibatla S, Kumar V, Narayan A. Relationship between trunk control and balance in children with spastic cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2017;11(9):YC05.
12. Garófalo-Gómez N, Barrera-Reséndiz J, Juárez-Colín ME, Pedraza-Aguilar MdC, Carrillo-Prado C, Marínez-Chávez J, et al. Outcome at age five years or older for children with perinatal brain injury treated with neurohabilitation or neurodevelopmental therapy. Available at SSRN 3335873. 2019.
13. Mayston MJ. People with cerebral palsy: effects of and perspectives for therapy. Neural plasticity. 2001;8(1-2):51-69.
14. Bar-On L, Aertbeliën E, Molenaers G, Desloovere K. Muscle activation patterns when passively stretching spastic lower limb muscles of children with cerebral palsy. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91759.
15. Bower E, Michell D, Burnett M, Campbell M, McLellan D. Randomized controlled trial of physiotherapy in 56 children with cerebral palsy followed for 18 months. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2001;43(1):4-15.
16. Jahnsen R, Villien L, Egeland T, Stanghelle J. Locomotion skills in adults with cerebral palsy. Clinical rehabilitation. 2004;18(3):309-16.