COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DAMAGE CONTROL SURGERY VERSUS DEFINITIVE SURGERY IN TRAUMA CARE
Main Article Content
Keywords
..
Abstract
Introduction: Effective management of traumatic injuries often determines patient outcomes, with timely and appropriate surgical intervention being paramount.
Objective: The main objective of the study is to find the comparative analysis of damage control surgery versus definitive surgery in trauma care.
Methodology of the study: This comparative study was conducted at Surgical Department Lady Reading hospital Peshawar during April 2022 to April 2024. Data were collected from 220 patients with age >18 years. Demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, mechanism of injury, and initial physiological parameters, blood pressure, heart rate, Glasgow Coma Scale were extracted from the EMRs and trauma registry.
Results: Data were collected from 220 patients. The average age was 35.6 ± 12.4 years in the DCS group and 34.8 ± 11.9 years in the DS group. Both groups had a similar male predominance, with 70% in the DCS group and 68% in the DS group. In terms of surgical procedures, 85% of the DCS group underwent hemorrhage control compared to 50% in the DS group. Temporary abdominal closure was performed in 75% of DCS patients, while no such procedures were needed in the DS group. Contamination control was necessary for 65% of the DCS group.
Conclusion: Damage Control Surgery (DCS) is essential for stabilizing critically injured patients with severe physiological instability, Definitive Surgery (DS) yields better overall outcomes, including fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and improved functional recovery
References
2. Roberts, D. J., Bobrovitz, N., Zygun, D. A., Kirkpatrick, A. W., Ball, C. G., Faris, P. D., ... & Indications for Trauma Damage Control Surgery International Study Group Karim Brohi Scott D’Amours Timothy C. Fabian Kenji Inaba Ari K. Leppäniemi Ernest E. Moore Pradeep H. Navsaria Andrew J. Nicol Neil Parry. (2021). Evidence for use of damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients: a systematic review. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 16, 1-23.
3. Pfeifer, R., Kalbas, Y., Coimbra, R., Leenen, L., Komadina, R., Hildebrand, F., ... & Pape, H. C. (2021). Indications and interventions of damage control orthopedic surgeries: an expert opinion survey. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 47, 2081-2092.
4. Martínez-Rondanelli, A., Gomez-Sierra, M. A., Ossa, A. A., Hernández, R. D., & Torres, M. (2021). Damage Control in Orthopedics and Traumatology. Colombia Medica, 52(2), e4184802-e4184802.
5. Leibner, E., Andreae, M., Galvagno Jr, S. M., & Scalea, T. (2020). Damage control resuscitation. Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine, 7(1), 5.
6. Cole, E., Weaver, A., Gall, L., West, A., Nevin, D., Tallach, R., ... & Brohi, K. (2021). A decade of damage control resuscitation: new transfusion practice, new survivors, new directions. Annals of surgery, 273(6), 1215-1220.
7. Rossaint, R., Afshari, A., Bouillon, B., Cerny, V., Cimpoesu, D., Curry, N., ... & Spahn, D. R. (2023). The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma. Critical Care, 27(1), 80.
8. Wilson, J. R., Witiw, C. D., Badhiwala, J., Kwon, B. K., Fehlings, M. G., & Harrop, J. S. (2020). Early surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury: where are we now?. Global spine journal, 10(1_suppl), 84S-91S.
9. Kuza, C. M., Hirji, S. A., Englum, B. R., Ganapathi, A. M., Speicher, P. J., & Scarborough, J. E. (2020). Pancreatic injuries in abdominal trauma in US adults: analysis of the national trauma data bank on management, outcomes, and predictors of mortality. Scandinavian journal of surgery, 109(3), 193-204.
10. Mikdad, S., van Erp, I. A., El Moheb, M., Fawley, J., Saillant, N., King, D. R., ... & Mendoza, A. E. (2020). Pre-peritoneal pelvic packing for early hemorrhage control reduces mortality compared to resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in severe blunt pelvic trauma patients: a nationwide analysis. Injury, 51(8), 1834-1839.
11. Choi, J., Carlos, G., Nassar, A. K., Knowlton, L. M., & Spain, D. A. (2021). The impact of trauma systems on patient outcomes. Current problems in surgery, 58(1), 100849.
12. Greaves, I., Porter, K., & Garner, J. (2021). Trauma care manual. CRC Press.
13. Mouawad, N. J., Paulisin, J., Hofmeister, S., & Thomas, M. B. (2020). Blunt thoracic aortic injury–concepts and management. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 15, 1-8.
14. Torres, C. M., Kent, A., Scantling, D., Joseph, B., Haut, E. R., & Sakran, J. V. (2023). Association of whole blood with survival among patients presenting with severe hemorrhage in US and Canadian adult civilian trauma centers. JAMA surgery, 158(5), 532-540.
15. Parry, J. A., Funk, A., Heare, A., Stacey, S., Mauffrey, C., Starr, A., ... & Trikha, V. (2021). An international survey of pelvic trauma surgeons on the management of pelvic ring injuries. Injury, 52(10), 2685-2692.
16. Wang, X., Yu, W. L., Fu, X. H., Zhu, B., Zhao, T., & Zhang, Y. J. (2020). Early versus delayed surgical repair and referral for patients with bile duct injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of surgery, 271(3), 449-459.
17. de Franca, S. A., Tavares, W. M., Salinet, A. S., Paiva, W. S., & Teixeira, M. J. (2020). Early tracheostomy in severe traumatic brain injury patients: a meta-analysis and comparison with late tracheostomy. Critical care medicine, 48(4), e325-e331.
18. Lorenz, K., Raffaeli, M., Barczyński, M., Lorente-Poch, L., & Sancho, J. (2020). Volume, outcomes, and quality standards in thyroid surgery: an evidence-based analysis—European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES) positional statement. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 405, 401-425.