FREQUENCY OF COMPLICATIONS OF TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (TLIF): A MULTI-CENTER EXPERIENCE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Frequency, Complications, Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Abstract
Background: The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) technique has become increasingly popular since its introduction by Harms in 1982. Its forerunner, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is limited to levels L3 to S1 since excessive retraction on the thecal sac at higher levels risks damage to the neurological structures.
Objective: To determine the frequency of Complications of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF).
Methodology: This study was multi-centre retrospective study carried out at the Department of Orthopedics and Spine Surgery, Qazi Hussain Ahmed Medical Complex, Nowshera and other private medical centers in Peshawar Pakistan. The study duration was one year from August 2021 to August 2022. A thorough evaluation of hospital records of these patients was done in terms of both intraoperative and postoperative complications. All the data was compiled and entered into SPSS version 23 for analysis.
Results: In this a total of 180 patients were included. The male patients in our study were 54(30%) whereas the female patients were 126 (70%). The mean age (±SD) was 457 (±7) years with minimum age of 20 years and maximum age of 75 years. The overall rate of complications in our study was 54 (30%). Post operative ileus in our study was observed in 13 (7.22%) patients. Post operative infection in our study was noted in 12 (6.67%) patients while per operative dural tear observed in our study was 8(4.44%) patients. Implants related complications were noted in 11(6.11%) patients. Pseudoarthrosis was documented in 4(2.22%) patients. There were no cases of pulmonary embolism or DVT formation in our series.
Conclusion: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a safe and effective option to achieve fusion in various conditions. It is technically challenging and the surgeon needs to be proficient in the technique to avoid catastrophic complications. Clinical scoring proved that our patients did benefit significantly when looking at pain and overall state of health.
References
2. Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe E, Hall JM, Polly DW, Kuklo T. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:Clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. Journal Spinal Disorders Tech 2005;18:337-46.
3. Weiner B,Nguyen H,Hazard S. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:An independent assessment of outcomes in a difficult patient pop- ulation. Med Sci Monit 2006;12(3):99-102.
4. Rosenberg MS,Mummaneni PV. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique, complications and early results. Neurosurgery 2001 March;48(3):569-74.
5. Salehi SA,Tawk R,Ganju A,Lallorca F,Liu JC,Ondra SL. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Surgical technique and results in 24 patients. Neurosurgery 2004 February;54(2):368-74.
6. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 2015;1(1):222-230.
7. Cole CD, McCall TD, Schmidt MH, Dailey AT. Comparison of low back fusion techniques: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2009;2(2):118-126.
8. Chrastil J, Patel AA. Complications associated with posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012 ;20(5):283-291.
9. Goz V, Weinreb JH, Schwab F, Lafage V, Errico TJ. Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Spine J 2014 ;14(9):2019-227.
10. Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 2001;48(3):569-575.
11. Satar A, Khan MZ, Ali M, Raza MM, Saeed M, Waqar M, et al . Contralateral radiculopathy: Is it rare after TLIF? KJMS 2019;12(1):58-61.
12. Rihn JA, Patel R, Makda J, Hong J, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, et al . Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2009;9(8):623-629.
13. Burneikiene S, Nelson EL, Mason A, Rajpal S, Serxner B, Villavicencio AT. Complications in patients undergoing combined transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation with deformity correction for degenerative scoliosis and spinal stenosis. Surg Neurol Int 2012;3:25-30.
14. Liu J, Deng H, Long X, Chen X, Xu R, Liu Z. A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 2016 ;25(5):1575-1580.
15. Takahashi T, Hanakita J, Minami M, Kitahama Y, Kuraishi K, Watanabe M, et al.Clinical outcomes and adverse events following transforaminal interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in elderly patients. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2011;51(12):829-835.
16. Wilson-McDonald J, Fairbank J, Frost H, Yu LM, Barker K, Collins R, Campbell H,Spine Stabilization Trial Group. The MRC spine stabiliza- tion trial: surgical methods,outcomes,costs,and complications of surgi- cal stabilization. Spine 2008 Oct 1;33(21):2334-40.
17. Zdeblick TA. A prospective randomized study of lumbar fusion: Preliminary results. Spine 1993 June 15;18(8):983-91.
18. France JC, Norman TL, Santrock RD, McGrath B, Simon BJ. Randomised prospective study of posterolateral fusion: Outcome with and without pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine 1999 March 15;24(6):553-60.
19. Kanyana M, Cunningham BW, Sefter JC, Goldstein JA, Stewart G, Kaneda K. Does spinal instrumentation influence healing process of pos- terolateral fusion? An in vivo animal model. Spine 1999 June 1;24(11):1058-65.
20. Fritzell P,Hagg O,Wessberg P,Nordwall A. Swedish Lumbar Spine Study group. 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies. Lumbar fusion vs non-surgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicentre ran- domized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 2001 Dec1; 26(23):2521-32. Discussion p2532-4.
21. Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM, Gerszten PC, Moossy JJ, Kanter AS, e t al. Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A single-center experience. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;16(1):44-50.
22. Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG, Hall JM, Polly Jr DW, Kuklo TR. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18(4):337- 346.
23. Hee HT, Castro Jr FP, Majd ME, Holt RT, Myers L. Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord 2001;14(6):533-540.
24. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 2010;19(10):1780-1784.
25. Lowe TG, Tahernia AD, O'Brien MF, Smith DA. Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15(1):31-38.
26. Whitecloud III TS, Roesch WW, Ricciardi JE. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior– posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J Spinal Disord 2001;14(2):100-103.
27. Aoki Y, Yamagata M, Nakajima F, Ikeda Y, Takahashi K. Posterior migration of fusion cages in degenerative lumbar disease treated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A report of three patients. Spine 2009 ;34(1):54-58.
28. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD, Lewis ML, Quinn LM, Persenaire JM. Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. Spine 2000 ;25(11):1437-1446.
29. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Griffith SL, Ahern JW, Dowdle JD. The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion: history, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial. Spine 1998;23(11):1267-1278.
30. Freeman BJ, Licina P, Mehdian SH. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with instrumented postero-lateral fusion: 5-year results in 60 patients. Eur Spine J 2000;9(1):42- 46.
31. Schofferman J, Slosar P, Reynolds J, Goldthwaite N, Koestler M. A prospective randomized comparison of 270 fusions to 360 fusions (circumferential fusions). Spine 2001;26(10):207-212.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Sardar Sohail Afsar
Chairman and Associate Professor, Nowshera Medical College and Qazi Hussain Ahmed Medical Complex, Nowshera Pakistan
Muhammad Gulzar Khan
Assistant Professor Orthopaedic Department, Jinnah Teaching Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan
Yaqoob Ur Rehman
Assistant Professor Orthopedic and Traumatology Unit, Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex/ Nowshera Medical College, Nowshera Pakistan