VALIDATION OF AN INSTRUMENT FOR PERCEIVED QUALITY OF HEALTH SERVICES IN COLOMBIA

Main Article Content

Frank De Hoyos Castro
Eustorgio Amed Salazar
Jhon Jairo Feria Díaz

Keywords

Quality, Consensus, Instrument, Health Services, Validation

Abstract

The quality perceived by health service users is vital for hospital institutions, which is why they require instruments to measure variables such as timeliness, accessibility, and user satisfaction. Most instruments used in Colombia are international scales created for all types of companies and adapted to the health area, which measures quality globally. Consequently, the present study aimed to provide a validated instrument to measure timeliness, accessibility, and satisfaction with health services perceived by users in hospital institutions.


Methods. The study was carried out in phases: design of the instrument, integrative review of the literature using indexed databases and gray literature, organization of the variables, and construction of the items. Qualitative and content validity, through a consensus of experts with four people with extensive experience and studies in the area of management and quality of health services, health auditing and research, who evaluated criteria of sufficiency, clarity, coherence and relevance of the instrument; the consensus was calculated with the V Aiken test. Finally, the reliability was calculated using a pilot test applied to 100 third-level hospital institution users. For internal consistency, Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega were calculated using SPSS version 27.


Results. An instrument called “Opportunity and accessibility to hospital services” was created with 20 items distributed across three variables. The instrument showed content validity by expert consensus (V Aiken 0.924), specifically opportunity 0.949, accessibility 0.898, and general satisfaction 0.98. Additionally, it showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.855) and McDonald's omega (0.869).


Conclusions. A valid and easy-to-understand instrument that can be used in hospital institutions can contribute to the quality of health services.


 

Abstract 106 | Pdf Downloads 36

References

1. Acevedo Garzón, J. (2015). Evaluation of the service satisfaction of the users of the IPS Servicios Integrales de Salud “VAQNAR” located in the city of Tunja Boyacá. http://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/jspui/handle/001/1457
2. Almeida, A., & Torres, D. (2020). Quality in the Provision of Health Services in a Hospital in Bucaramanga - Colombia. Espacios, 41(49), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a20v41n49p19
3. AWHONN. (2017). Access to Health Care Position. JOGNN, 46(1), 114–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco
4. Bedoya Marrugo, E., Arias Montero, Z., & Viloria Chaparro, E. (2020). Perception of quality in health services in Colombia, under the SERVQUAL and SERVPERF instruments as of June 2020. https://jint.usach.cl/sites/jint/files/art._6_articulo_v7n2jint002-20.pdf
5. De La Hoz Correa, A. P. (2014). Proposal for the application of the SERVQUAL scale in the health sector of Medellin. CES Salud Pública, 5(2), 107–116. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4974882
6. Dunn, J. G. H., Bouffard, M., & Rogers, W. T. (1999). Assessing item content-relevance in sport psychology scale-construction research: Issues and recommendations. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 3(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0301_2
7. Escobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Content validity and expert judgment: an approach to their use. Avances En Medición, 6(1), 27–36.
8. Henao Nieto, D. E., Giraldo Villa, A., & Yepes Delgado, C. E. (2018). Instruments to evaluate the quality perceived by users of health services. Revista Gerencia y Políticas de Salud, 17(34). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.rgps17-34.iecp
9. Hoyos, A., Tipán, M., & Zemanate, M. (2020). Evaluation of user satisfaction in the outpatient service at the IPS Nuestra Señora de las Misericordias de Bolivar Cauca. In repositorio ean. https://repository.ean.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10882/9879/HoyosAnggy2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
10. Huaccho Travezaño, C. (2019). Perception of users regarding the humanized care of the nurse - Emergency - Clínica Padre Luis Tezza - December 2017 - January 2018. Repositorio Académico USMP, 1–56. https://bit.ly/3D5mS8G
11. Jiménez Oróstegui, O. L., Flórez Dussán, N., Sanabria Vásquez, L., & Romero Ortiz, J. (2014). Timeliness indicators reported by the Benefit Plan Administration Entities to the National Superintendence of Health (SNS) during 2012-2013. Follow-up of compliance with Decree 019 of 2012. www.supersalud.gov.co
12. Mangundu, M., Roets, L., & Janse Van Rensberg, E. (2020). Accessibility of healthcare in rural Zimbabwe: The perspective of nurses and healthcare users. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm
13. Ministerio de la Protección Social. (2006). Decree number 1011 of 2006. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Normatividad_Nuevo/DECRETO%201011%20DE%202006.pdf
14. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. (2013). Resolution 1552 of 2013. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/resolucion-1552-de-2013.pdf
15. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. (2015). Statutory Law No. 1751 of 2015.. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Normatividad_Nuevo/Ley%201751%20de%202015.pdf
16. Muñiz, J. (2018). Introduction to Psychometrics Classical Theory and IRT (J. I. Luca de Tena, Ed.; Primera edición, Vol. 1).
17. Penfield, R. D., & Giacobbi, P. R. (2004). Applying a score confidence interval to Aiken’s item content-relevance index. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 8(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0804_3
18. Pu, Q., Yoo, E. H., Rothstein, D. H., Cairo, S., & Malemo, L. (2020). Improving the spatial accessibility of healthcare in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Applied Geography, 121, 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102262
19. SuperSalud. (2009). External Circular No. 00056. https://www.sanidadfuerzasmilitares.mil.co/ transparencia-acceso-informacion-publica/4-normatividad/4-6-normograma-digsa/subdireccion-salud-digsa/prestacion-operacion-servicios-salud-1/proceso-garantia-calidad-salud-digsa/normas-externas-aplicadas-al-regimen/circular-056-2009-sed-define-sistema
20. Ventura León, J. L., & Caycho Rodriguez, T. (2017). The Omega coefficient: an alternative method for reliability estimation. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625–627. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77349