D-DIMER VARIABILITY WITH COMORBIDITIES AND MULTIMORBIDITIES DURING COVID-19 INFECTION
Main Article Content
Keywords
COVID-19, D-dimer, Comorbidities, multimorbidity, thrombotic disorders
Abstract
Coronavirus infection 2019 (COVID-19), a respiratory illness, is also linked to thrombotic disorders. The elevation of D-dimer is a prognostic biomarker for adverse outcomes in COVID-19. Nevertheless, the association between elevated D-dimer levels and different comorbidities and Multimorbidities lacks understanding. This study is designed to bridge this knowledge gap by focusing on this research side.
The study involved a cohort of 618 COVID-19 patients and explored the relationship of D-dimer level with different factors including age groups, comorbidities, medical interventions and disease outcomes. The mean D-dimer level at the time of hospitalization was 2664.08 ng/mL (2.7µg/mL), displaying significant variation (range: 96 to 12900 ng/mL). Old Age patients demonstrated a significant correlation (p=.000) with D-dimer levels, particularly elevated levels at the old age (≥65) group. A significant connection between D-dimer levels and comorbidities, including diabetes (p=.000), hypertension (p=.000), asthma (p=.003), ischemic heart disease (p=.000), and chronic kidney diseases (p=.000) and Tuberculosis (p=.001) revealed the occurrence of high coagulation activity due to these comorbidities. Furthermore, the elevated D-dimer was associated with high requirements of medical interventions including non-invasive ventilation (p=.000), mechanical ventilation (p=.000), and Intensive care unit admission (p=.000) with a high probability to cause deaths (p=.000). Cox regression analysis indicated a significant correlation of D-dimer levels with the duration of hospitalization in recovered COVID-19 patients (Chi-square = 32.839, df = 1, p < .001) as well as in deceased COVID-19 patients (Chi-square = 62.906, df = 1, p < .001). However, the hazard ratio for D-dimer level was found to be 1.000, representing no change in the hazard of duration of hospitalization with a one-unit increase in D-dimer values. In addition, logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association (p < 0.001) between elevated D-dimer levels at the time of admission increased likelihood of death. These findings provide crucial insights into the role of D-dimer in disease severity, prognosis, and personalized patient management strategies in the context of COVID-19.
In conclusion, this study underscores the intricate associations of D-dimer levels with comorbidities and multimorbidities ultimately affecting the medical interventions, and disease outcomes in COVID-19 patients.
References
[2] Y. V Chudasama et al., “Patterns of multimorbidity and risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: an observational study in the UK,” BMC Infect. Dis., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.
[3] F. A. Klok et al., “Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19,” Thromb. Res., vol. 191, pp. 145–147, 2020.
[4] I. Tusheva, K. Damevska, I. Dimitrovska, Z. Markovska, and L. Malinovska-Nikolovska, “Unilateral livedo reticularis in a COVID-19 patient: Case with fatal outcome,” JAAD Case Reports, vol. 7, pp. 120–121, 2021.
[5] F. Rongioletti and V. Caputo, “COVID-19-Related Cutaneous Manifestations,” New Emerg. Entities Dermatology Dermatopathol., pp. 287–311, 2021.
[6] S. Rashid, A. Zulfiqar, A. A. Sattar, M. Rizwan, W. Ali, and A. Ilyas, “Platelets and D-dimer as the Biomarkers for COVID-19: Platelets and D-dimers as Biomarkers for COVID-19,” Pakistan Biomed. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 103–106, 2021.
[7] R. Yu and M. Ferri, “An unusual cause of pulmonary nodules in the emergency department,” Case Rep. Emerg. Med., vol. 2015, 2015.
[8] P. Zubiate Orzanco et al., “Fiber-based early diagnosis of venous thromboembolic disease by label-free D-dimer detection,” Biosens. Bioelectron. X 2 2019 100026, 2019.
[9] F. Alzoughool, L. Alanagreh, S. Abumweis, and M. Atoum, “Cerebrovascular comorbidity, high blood levels of C-reactive protein and D-dimer are associated with disease outcomes in COVID-19 patients,” Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc., vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 311–322, 2021.
[10] H. Zhan et al., “Diagnostic value of D-dimer in COVID-19: a meta-analysis and meta-regression,” Clin. Appl. Thromb., vol. 27, p. 10760296211010976, 2021.
[11] L. Zhang et al., “D‐dimer levels on admission to predict in‐hospital mortality in patients with Covid‐19,” J. Thromb. Haemost., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1324–1329, 2020.
[12] X. He et al., “The poor prognosis and influencing factors of high D-dimer levels for COVID-19 patients,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1830, 2021.
[13] H. Debi, Z. T. Itu, M. T. Amin, F. Hussain, and M. S. Hossain, “Association of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-dimer concentration on the severity of COVID-19 cases with or without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Expert Rev. Endocrinol. Metab., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 83–93, 2022.
[14] G. Lippi, F. Mullier, and E. J. Favaloro, “D-dimer: old dogmas, new (COVID-19) tricks,” Clin. Chem. Lab. Med., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 841–850, 2023.
[15] L. Roncon, M. Zuin, and P. Zonzin, “Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off levels to rule out venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients,” Thromb. Res., vol. 190, p. 102, 2020.
[16] A. Alsrhani, A. Alshomar, A. Y. Elderdery, Z. Rasheed, and A. Farhana, “Diagnosis and Stratification of COVID-19 Infections Using Differential Plasma Levels of D-Dimer: A Two-Center Study from Saudi Arabia,” Microbiol. Res. (Pavia)., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2023.
[17] I. Hashim Ibrahim Elbashir, H. Kamal Ali Mohamed, M. E. Adam Essa, and A. Seri, “Comparison between D‐dimer levels in diabetic and non‐diabetic positive COVID‐19 adult patients: A hospital‐based study,” Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab., vol. 5, no. 4, p. e349, 2022.
[18] E. Manalu, J. Josafat, and D. E. J. Luhulima, “D-Dimer Levels in Covid-19 Patients with Moderate and Severe Symptoms,” Int. J. Heal. Sci. Res., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 210–216, 2023.
[19] S. Patil, S. Khule, and S. Toshniwal, “Role of D-Dimer in assessing severity, monitoring, and predicating outcome in COVID-19 pneumonia: A single center study,” Glob J Heal. Sci Res, vol. 1, pp. 31–37, 2023.
[20] O.-Z. Akácsos-Szász et al., “Pathways of Coagulopathy and Inflammatory Response in SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Type 2 Diabetic Patients,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 24, no. 5, p. 4319, 2023.
[21] A. Bonaventura et al., “Endothelial dysfunction and immunothrombosis as key pathogenic mechanisms in COVID-19,” Nat. Rev. Immunol., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 319–329, 2021.
[22] M. Kannan, F. Ahmad, and R. Saxena, “Platelet activation markers in evaluation of thrombotic risk factors in various clinical settings,” Blood Rev., vol. 37, p. 100583, 2019.
[23] S. Vinayagam and K. Sattu, “SARS-CoV-2 and coagulation disorders in different organs,” Life Sci., vol. 260, p. 118431, 2020.
[24] W. Zhao, H. Li, J. Li, B. Xu, and J. Xu, “The mechanism of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in patients with COVID‐19,” J. Med. Virol., vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1886–1892, 2022.
[25] H. Lu et al., “Fibrinolysis regulation: A promising approach to promote osteogenesis,” Tissue Eng. Part B Rev., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1192–1208, 2022.