VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY OF AN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS NOISE-INDUCED HEARING LOSS KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND PRACTICES IN EXPOSED WORKERS
Main Article Content
Keywords
noise-induced hearing loss, knowledge, attitudes, practice
Abstract
A quantitative, descriptive, non-experimental study was conducted to determine the validity and reliability of an instrument that assesses the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of workers exposed to noise-induced hearing loss. The study was conducted in three phases: a systematic review of the scientific literature, construction of the instrument, validity, and reliability. The systematic review using the PRISMA methodology included 19 articles that supported the construction of the theoretical construct for the elaboration of the items of the instrument constituted in its post-validation version by 36 items in the dimensions of knowledge, attitudes, and practices. The statistical program Microsoft Excel 19.0 was used to validate the instrument, and the R Core Team Statistical Program, R-Studio, version 4.2.1, and a single coding based on SPSS Version 24 were used to calibrate the instrument. Content validity by expert judges obtained an overall CVI 0.77 (CVI knowledge 0.91, attitudes 0.89, practices 0.91) and statistical reliability by Cronbach's Alpha coefficient showed overall internal consistency 0.77 (knowledge 0.82, attitudes 0.80, practices 0.70). The validity and reliability results indicate that the instrument is acceptable, according to the objectives and scope of this research.
References
1. Álvarez, B., Patricia, E., & Rivera, D. (2016). Validez de contenido de un instrumento para medir la responsabilidad social de las empresas bancarias.
2. Anacona, Lilian; González, Nancy y Vela, P. (2016). Caracterización del estado auditivo y condición de exposición a ruido de 15 DISC.JOCKEY de la Ciudad de Popayán – Cauca. [Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana]. https://repositorio.ibero.edu.co/bitstream/001/382/1/Caracterización del estado auditivo y condición de exposición a ruido de 15 disc.jockey de la ciudad de Popayán – Cauca.pdf
3. Basheer, R., Bhargavi, P. G., & Prakash, H. P. (2019). Knowledge, attitude, and practice of printing press workers towards noise-induced hearing loss. Noise and Health, 21(99), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_9_19
4. Basu, S., Aggarwal, A., Dushyant, K., & Garg, S. (2022). Occupational noise induced hearing loss in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In Indian Journal of Community Medicine (Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 166–171). https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1267_21
5. Carreño-Moreno, S., Chaparro-Díaz, L., & Esther Cáliz Romero, N. (2022). Validez de la escala de soledad UCLA en cuidadores de pacientes crónicos en Colombia*. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.ie24.vesu
6. Chen, K. H., Su, S. Bin, & Chen, K. T. (2020). An overview of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among workers: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and preventive measures. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12199-020-00906-0
7. Espinosa Díaz, Y., & Llorens Baez, L. (2015). Exploración de la capacidad de liderazgo para la incorporación de TICC en educación: validación de un instrumento. RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 14(3), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.14.3.35
8. Filza Ismail, A., Daud, A., Ismail, Z., & Abdullah, B. (2013). Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Among Quarry Workers in a North-Eastern State of Malaysia: A Study on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice. Oman Medical Journal, 28(5), 331. https://doi.org/10.5001/OMJ.2013.96
9. García, J. R. A., Díez, B. F., & García, C. S. E. (2020). Construction and validation of an instrument for measuring attitudes towards Body Expression. Retos, 83, 443–451.
10. García Perales, R. (2018). Diseño y construcción de un instrumento de evaluación de la competencia matemática: aplicabilidad práctica de un juicio de expertos. https://www.scielo.br/j/ensaio/a/FCRnhPmsd4CwF8tcnvVD64q/?format=pdf&lang=es
11. Gómez, P. (2016). Desarrollo de una Propuesta de Intervención Educativa para modificar los Conocimientos , Actitudes y Prácticas sobre el uso de Equipo de Protección Auditiva en una Empresa Textil Patricia María Gómez Cortez Mtra . Luz Angélica de la Sierra de la Vega Dr .
12. Gong, W., Zhao, L., Li, L., Morata, T. C., Qiu, W., Feng, H. A., & Zhu, B. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of earplugs in preventing noise-induced hearing loss in an auto parts factory in china. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137190
13. Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (6th ed.). McGRAW-HILL / INTERAMERICANA EDITORES, S.A. DE C.V.
14. Hon, C. Y., Tchernikov, I., Fairclough, C., & Behar, A. (2020). Case study in a working environment highlighting the divergence between noise intensity and workers’ perception towards noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176122
15. Jodeck-Osses, M., Tapia-Salinas, D., & Puente, A. (2021). Construction and validation of a Reading Motivation Scale for Language and Communication Teachers (RMSLCT). Ocnos, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.18239/OCNOS_2021.20.3.2525
16. Kanji, A., Khoza-Shangase, K., & Ntlhakana, L. (2019). Noise-induced hearing loss: what South African mineworkers know. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 25(2), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1412122
17. Lie, A., Skogstad, M., Johannessen, H. A., Tynes, T., Mehlum, I. S., Nordby, K. C., Engdahl, B., & Tambs, K. (2016). Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 89(3), 351. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00420-015-1083-5
18. Mangelsdorff G., G., Deichler V., F., García-Huidobro D., M. A., Enríquez Ch., E., Israel V., G., & Pesqueira B., M. T. (2013). Validación de un instrumento para evaluar calidad de vida asociada a hipertrofia mamaria en mujeres chilenas. Revista Medica de Chile, 141(9), 1143–1149. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872013000900006
19. Mapuranga, M., Maziriri, E. T., Letshaba, R. K., & Chitamba, A. (2020). Does occupational noise matter amongst manufacturing (Small and medium enterprises) workers? empirical evidence from Magaba, Mbare, Zimbabwe. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 67(2). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v67i2.680
20. Medina, R. (2020). Content Validity of a Measurement Instrument of Human Rights in Mexico. Ciencias Sociales, 168(Ii), 203–232.
21. Melese, M., Adugna, D. G., Mulat, B., & Adera, A. (2022). Hearing loss and its associated factors among metal workshop workers at Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.919239
22. Ministerio de la Protección Social. (2007). Guía de Atención Integral en Salud Ocupacional Basada en la Evidencia para Hipoacusia Neurosensorial Inducida por Ruido en el Trabajo.
23. Nyarubeli, I. P., Tungu, A. M., Bråtveit, M., & Moen, B. E. (2019). Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss: A study of knowledge, attitude and practice among Tanzanian iron and steel workers Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss: A study of knowledge, attitude and practice among Tanzanian iron and steel workers. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2019.1607816
24. Pollarolo, M., Immordino, A., Immordino, P., Sireci, F., Lorusso, F., & Dispenza, F. (2022). Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Police Officers: Systematic Review. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 34(5), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2022.64036.3198
25. Rus, R. M., Daud, A., Musa, K. I., & Naing, L. (2008). Knowledge, attitude and practice of sawmill workers towards noise-induced hearing loss in Kota Bharu, Kelantan. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 15(4), 28–34. /pmc/articles/PMC3341918/
26. Sayapathi, B. S., Su, A. T., & Koh, D. (2014). KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND PRACTICE IN RELATION TO NOISE- INDUCED HEARING LOSS IN TWO FACTORIES. International Conference on Innovative Trends in Multidisciplinary Academic Research, 2004, 562–576.
27. Schettini, S. R. L., & Gonçalves, C. G. de O. (2017). Quality of life, perception and knowledge of dentists on noise. Revista CEFAC, 19(6), 782–791. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620171966717
28. Soriano, A. M. (2014). Diseño y validación de instrumentos de medición. Design and validation of measurement instruments. Diá-Logos 14, 8(13), 19–40. http://www.redicces.org.sv/jspui/bitstream/10972/2105/1/2 disenoyvalidacion_dialogos14.pdf
29. Tantranont, K., & Codchanak, N. (2017). Predictors of Hearing Protection Use among Industrial Workers. Workplace Health and Safety, 65(8), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079917693019
30. Themann, C. L., & Masterson, E. A. (2019). Occupational noise exposure: A review of its effects, epidemiology, and impact with recommendations for reducing its burden. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(5), 3879. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5134465
31. Thepaksorn, P., Siriwong, W., Neitzel, R. L., Somrongthong, R., & Techasrivichien, T. (2018). Relationship Between Noise-Related Risk Perception, Knowledge, and the Use of Hearing Protection Devices Among Para Rubber Wood Sawmill Workers. Safety and Health at Work, 9(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SHAW.2017.06.002
32. Tristán-López, A. (n.d.). MODIFICACIÓN AL MODELO DE LAWSHE PARA EL DICTAMEN CUANTITATIVO DE LA VALIDEZ DE CONTENIDO DE UN INSTRUMENTO OBJETIVO. 6, 37–48.
33. Vásquez, G., Campos, Y., Gómez, A., & Vásquez, L. (2017). Percepción de la pérdida auditiva en trabajadores del sector de la construcción, ciudad Quito. INNOVA Research Journal, 2(11), 24–30.
34. Velásquez Díaz, J. C., & Pineda Rodríguez, L. D. (2016). Diseño de un instrumento para la identificación del matoneo. Informes Psicológicos, 16(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.18566/infpsicv16n2a08
2. Anacona, Lilian; González, Nancy y Vela, P. (2016). Caracterización del estado auditivo y condición de exposición a ruido de 15 DISC.JOCKEY de la Ciudad de Popayán – Cauca. [Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana]. https://repositorio.ibero.edu.co/bitstream/001/382/1/Caracterización del estado auditivo y condición de exposición a ruido de 15 disc.jockey de la ciudad de Popayán – Cauca.pdf
3. Basheer, R., Bhargavi, P. G., & Prakash, H. P. (2019). Knowledge, attitude, and practice of printing press workers towards noise-induced hearing loss. Noise and Health, 21(99), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_9_19
4. Basu, S., Aggarwal, A., Dushyant, K., & Garg, S. (2022). Occupational noise induced hearing loss in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In Indian Journal of Community Medicine (Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 166–171). https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1267_21
5. Carreño-Moreno, S., Chaparro-Díaz, L., & Esther Cáliz Romero, N. (2022). Validez de la escala de soledad UCLA en cuidadores de pacientes crónicos en Colombia*. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.ie24.vesu
6. Chen, K. H., Su, S. Bin, & Chen, K. T. (2020). An overview of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among workers: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and preventive measures. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12199-020-00906-0
7. Espinosa Díaz, Y., & Llorens Baez, L. (2015). Exploración de la capacidad de liderazgo para la incorporación de TICC en educación: validación de un instrumento. RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 14(3), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.14.3.35
8. Filza Ismail, A., Daud, A., Ismail, Z., & Abdullah, B. (2013). Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Among Quarry Workers in a North-Eastern State of Malaysia: A Study on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice. Oman Medical Journal, 28(5), 331. https://doi.org/10.5001/OMJ.2013.96
9. García, J. R. A., Díez, B. F., & García, C. S. E. (2020). Construction and validation of an instrument for measuring attitudes towards Body Expression. Retos, 83, 443–451.
10. García Perales, R. (2018). Diseño y construcción de un instrumento de evaluación de la competencia matemática: aplicabilidad práctica de un juicio de expertos. https://www.scielo.br/j/ensaio/a/FCRnhPmsd4CwF8tcnvVD64q/?format=pdf&lang=es
11. Gómez, P. (2016). Desarrollo de una Propuesta de Intervención Educativa para modificar los Conocimientos , Actitudes y Prácticas sobre el uso de Equipo de Protección Auditiva en una Empresa Textil Patricia María Gómez Cortez Mtra . Luz Angélica de la Sierra de la Vega Dr .
12. Gong, W., Zhao, L., Li, L., Morata, T. C., Qiu, W., Feng, H. A., & Zhu, B. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of earplugs in preventing noise-induced hearing loss in an auto parts factory in china. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137190
13. Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (6th ed.). McGRAW-HILL / INTERAMERICANA EDITORES, S.A. DE C.V.
14. Hon, C. Y., Tchernikov, I., Fairclough, C., & Behar, A. (2020). Case study in a working environment highlighting the divergence between noise intensity and workers’ perception towards noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176122
15. Jodeck-Osses, M., Tapia-Salinas, D., & Puente, A. (2021). Construction and validation of a Reading Motivation Scale for Language and Communication Teachers (RMSLCT). Ocnos, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.18239/OCNOS_2021.20.3.2525
16. Kanji, A., Khoza-Shangase, K., & Ntlhakana, L. (2019). Noise-induced hearing loss: what South African mineworkers know. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 25(2), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1412122
17. Lie, A., Skogstad, M., Johannessen, H. A., Tynes, T., Mehlum, I. S., Nordby, K. C., Engdahl, B., & Tambs, K. (2016). Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 89(3), 351. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00420-015-1083-5
18. Mangelsdorff G., G., Deichler V., F., García-Huidobro D., M. A., Enríquez Ch., E., Israel V., G., & Pesqueira B., M. T. (2013). Validación de un instrumento para evaluar calidad de vida asociada a hipertrofia mamaria en mujeres chilenas. Revista Medica de Chile, 141(9), 1143–1149. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872013000900006
19. Mapuranga, M., Maziriri, E. T., Letshaba, R. K., & Chitamba, A. (2020). Does occupational noise matter amongst manufacturing (Small and medium enterprises) workers? empirical evidence from Magaba, Mbare, Zimbabwe. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 67(2). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v67i2.680
20. Medina, R. (2020). Content Validity of a Measurement Instrument of Human Rights in Mexico. Ciencias Sociales, 168(Ii), 203–232.
21. Melese, M., Adugna, D. G., Mulat, B., & Adera, A. (2022). Hearing loss and its associated factors among metal workshop workers at Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.919239
22. Ministerio de la Protección Social. (2007). Guía de Atención Integral en Salud Ocupacional Basada en la Evidencia para Hipoacusia Neurosensorial Inducida por Ruido en el Trabajo.
23. Nyarubeli, I. P., Tungu, A. M., Bråtveit, M., & Moen, B. E. (2019). Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss: A study of knowledge, attitude and practice among Tanzanian iron and steel workers Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss: A study of knowledge, attitude and practice among Tanzanian iron and steel workers. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2019.1607816
24. Pollarolo, M., Immordino, A., Immordino, P., Sireci, F., Lorusso, F., & Dispenza, F. (2022). Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Police Officers: Systematic Review. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 34(5), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2022.64036.3198
25. Rus, R. M., Daud, A., Musa, K. I., & Naing, L. (2008). Knowledge, attitude and practice of sawmill workers towards noise-induced hearing loss in Kota Bharu, Kelantan. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 15(4), 28–34. /pmc/articles/PMC3341918/
26. Sayapathi, B. S., Su, A. T., & Koh, D. (2014). KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND PRACTICE IN RELATION TO NOISE- INDUCED HEARING LOSS IN TWO FACTORIES. International Conference on Innovative Trends in Multidisciplinary Academic Research, 2004, 562–576.
27. Schettini, S. R. L., & Gonçalves, C. G. de O. (2017). Quality of life, perception and knowledge of dentists on noise. Revista CEFAC, 19(6), 782–791. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620171966717
28. Soriano, A. M. (2014). Diseño y validación de instrumentos de medición. Design and validation of measurement instruments. Diá-Logos 14, 8(13), 19–40. http://www.redicces.org.sv/jspui/bitstream/10972/2105/1/2 disenoyvalidacion_dialogos14.pdf
29. Tantranont, K., & Codchanak, N. (2017). Predictors of Hearing Protection Use among Industrial Workers. Workplace Health and Safety, 65(8), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079917693019
30. Themann, C. L., & Masterson, E. A. (2019). Occupational noise exposure: A review of its effects, epidemiology, and impact with recommendations for reducing its burden. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(5), 3879. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5134465
31. Thepaksorn, P., Siriwong, W., Neitzel, R. L., Somrongthong, R., & Techasrivichien, T. (2018). Relationship Between Noise-Related Risk Perception, Knowledge, and the Use of Hearing Protection Devices Among Para Rubber Wood Sawmill Workers. Safety and Health at Work, 9(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SHAW.2017.06.002
32. Tristán-López, A. (n.d.). MODIFICACIÓN AL MODELO DE LAWSHE PARA EL DICTAMEN CUANTITATIVO DE LA VALIDEZ DE CONTENIDO DE UN INSTRUMENTO OBJETIVO. 6, 37–48.
33. Vásquez, G., Campos, Y., Gómez, A., & Vásquez, L. (2017). Percepción de la pérdida auditiva en trabajadores del sector de la construcción, ciudad Quito. INNOVA Research Journal, 2(11), 24–30.
34. Velásquez Díaz, J. C., & Pineda Rodríguez, L. D. (2016). Diseño de un instrumento para la identificación del matoneo. Informes Psicológicos, 16(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.18566/infpsicv16n2a08
Article Sidebar
Published
Jun 1, 2023
Article Details
How to Cite
Lina María Domínguez Puerta, Marinela Álvarez Borrero, & Jhon Jairo Feria Díaz. (2023). VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY OF AN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS NOISE-INDUCED HEARING LOSS KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND PRACTICES IN EXPOSED WORKERS. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 30(12), 516-527. https://doi.org/10.53555/jptcp.v30i12.6548
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author Biographies
Lina María Domínguez Puerta
Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Sucre, Sincelejo, 700001, Colombia
Marinela Álvarez Borrero
Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Sucre, Sincelejo, 700001, Colombia
Jhon Jairo Feria Díaz
Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Sucre, Sincelejo 700001, Colombia
How to Cite
Lina María Domínguez Puerta, Marinela Álvarez Borrero, & Jhon Jairo Feria Díaz. (2023). VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY OF AN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS NOISE-INDUCED HEARING LOSS KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND PRACTICES IN EXPOSED WORKERS. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 30(12), 516-527. https://doi.org/10.53555/jptcp.v30i12.6548