ASSESSING PERSPECTIVES ON RESEARCH-BASED TRAINING IN GENERAL PRACTICE: A SURVEY STUDY AMONG TRAINEES, PRACTITIONERS, AND TRAINERS

Main Article Content

Dr. V. Thiru Kumareswaran

Keywords

General Practices, Trainees, Multitasking challenges, Research based training, Program improvement

Abstract

There are many opportunities for young physicians to work in general practice departments as trainees and researchers. In most cases, trainees combine university work with clinical work part-time. A survey was conducted among trainees, department heads, and trainee trainers for general practitioners to find out how they view research-based training. Online surveys were conducted with general practitioners, trainees, and trainers. In the questionnaires, questions were both open-ended and closed-ended. Statistical analysis was carried out using both qualitative and descriptive methods. There were 56 trainees and 40 trainees who responded. Generally, trainees were satisfied with their training situation. Research and general practice training proved to be difficult for trainees. Research on general practice is lacking credibility and has problems with multitasking. A solution advocated is training that enables research. There is a perception that it is difficult to combine medical training with scientific research. It is still possible to improve the quality of the combination by well-designed and well-organized programs.

Abstract 44 | PDF Downloads 23

References

1. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin. Allgemeinmedizin - spezialisiert auf den ganzen Menschen.Positionen zur Zukunft der Allgemeinmedizin und der hausärztlichen Praxis. Frankfurt: DEGAM; 2012.
2. Glanville J, Kendrick T, McNally R, Campbell J, Hobbs FR.Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:d1028–d1028.
3. Baum E, Niebling W. 40 Jahre DEGAM: Allgemeinmedizin an der Hochschule: Ist-Zustand und Ausblick. Z Allg Med.2006;82:415–419.
4. Hummers-Pradier E. 40 Jahre DEGAM: Allgemeinmedizinische Forschung in Deutschland - Entwicklung und aktueller Stand. Z Allg Med. 2006;82:409–414.
5. Schneider A, Großmann N, Linde K. The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010. BMC Fam Pract.2013;13:58.
6. Kochen MM. Allgemeinmedizin an deutschen Hochschulen: Herzlichen Gluückwunsch!. Z Allg Med. 2013;89:337.
7. Bergmann A, Ehrhardt M. Sektionsbericht Studium und Hochschule 2013. Z Allg Med. 2013;89:275–276.
8. Bitzinger D, Heberlein A, Theilmeier G. Forschung in der Weiterbildung: Die Generation Y will klare Aussagen über Karrierewege. Dtsch Arztebl. 2014;111:A442-446.
9. Just I. Wege zur Habilitation. Hannover: MH Hannover; 2013.Zugänglich unter/available from: http://www.mh-hannover.de/ fileadmin/mhh/download/forschung/Habil/Habil_April_2013_ handout.pdf (zuletzt überprüft 11.02.2014)
10. Herrmann WJ, Kötter T, Freund T, Carmienke S. Vereinbarkeit von Forschung und Facharztweiterbildung in der Allgemeinpraxis. Z Allg Med. 2013;89:122–126.
11. Chenot JF. Wissenschaft und Weiterbildung. Z Allg Med. 2013;89:80.
12. Weltermann B, Nagel E, Gesenhues S. Integrierte universitäre Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin: Hausarzt und Wissenschaftler in einem. Dtsch Arztebl. 2012;109:A1222–1224.
13. Gensichen J, Stengler K, Schulz S. FacharztweiterbildungAllgemeinmedizin: "Heilen, Führen, Gestalten". Dtsch Arztebl. 2012;109:62.
14. Lange S, Bender R. Median or mean? Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007;132(Suppl 1):e1–2.
15. Del Mar C, Askew D. Building family/general practice research capacity. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(Suppl 2):S35–40.
16. Steinhäuser J, Roos M, Haberer K, Ledig T, Peters-Klimm F,Szecsenyi J, Joos S. Report from general practice: the composite graduate education(plus) program of the Baden-Württemberg General Practice Competence Center - development, implementation and prospects. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(2):105–109.
17. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin. Assistenzärzte sollen Forschung zukünftig auf Weiterbildung anrechnen können. Wiesbaden: DGIM; 2006.
18. Gerst T, Hibbeler B. Klinische Forschung: Ärztemangel im Labor. Dtsch Arztebl. 2012;109:A-1804.