EVALUATION DOUBLE SLOT BRACKETS VS SINGLE SLOTS FOR FIRST STAGE ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT BY PAR AND ABO INDICES
Main Article Content
Keywords
leveling, alignment, double wire
Abstract
The goal of the initial stage of orthodontic therapy, alignment, is to realign the teeth's contact sites by correcting rotations and crowding. Two of the most popular indices for orthodontic treatment outcome are the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Objective Grading System ,This study was designed to observe the treatment efficiency between double slot (double wire) and single slot (single wire ) on participants undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment for leveling and alignment. This randomized clinical trial (observational study) was conducted on Patients awaiting treatment at the College of Dentistry at Hawlere Medical University . All patients who gave verbal and written informed consent were included in the study, which was approved by the ethics committee of the Hawler Medical University College of Dentistry after was registered by Sri Lanka Clinical Trials ( SLCTR/2022/015.). After properly diagnosing . using digital cephalometry, OPG, intraoral and extraoral photos, and intra-oral scanning of each patient was held before starting treatment and after 3month of of alignments. There was no statistically significant differences between single and double wire cases regarding PAR and ABO parameters before intervention, p-values were more than 0.05. for both indices. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between these two methods of alignment according to PAR index statistically showed nonsignificant while for ABO showed significant difference.
References
2. Al-Ibrahim HM, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Hamed YH, Alkhouri I, Zinah E. Assessment of dentoalveolar changes following leveling and alignment of severely crowded upper anterior teeth using self-ligating brackets alone or with flapless piezocision compared to traditional brackets: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Cureus. 2023;15(3).
3. AlSayed Hasan MMA, Sultan K, Hamadah O. Low-level laser therapy effectiveness in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A randomized controlled clinical trial. The Angle Orthodontist. 2016;87(4):499-504.
4. Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. On a Path to Unfolding the Biological Mechanisms of Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Journal of Dental Research. 2009;88(7):597-608.
5. Nabbat SA, Yassir YA. A clinical comparison of the effectiveness of two types of orthodontic aligning archwire materials: a multicentre randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2020;42(6):626-34.
6. Saleh MH, Abdulla Hasan B. Evaluation of Pain Between Double Slot Orthodontic Brackets Versus Single Slot by Visual Analogue Scale and Saliva Biomarkers. Journal of Medicinal and Chemical Sciences. 2023;6(10):2282-91.
7. Salwa Bavikara Maniyankod SS, Minaz, Kevin Joseph Nirayath. Assessment of the Efficacy of Duploslot Brackets in fixed orthodontic treatment- An Observational Study. European Chemical Bulletin. 2023(11):451-60.
8. Wazwaz FT. Investigations into orthodontic tooth movement rate: King's College London; 2023.
9. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson B, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics-e-book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.
10. Donaldson CD. Bracket Design. Preadjusted Edgewise Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: Principles and Practice. 2023:111-36.
11. Mohiuddin MI. Evaluation of the Lingual Orthodontic Appliance: A Clinical Study: Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India); 2009.
12. Zucchi TU, Hamid TA, Janovich CA. Bráquete ortodôntico duplo slot convencional. Ortho Sci, Orthod sci pract. 2021:95-8.
13. Lopes AG. Ortodontia de precisão. Revista Clínica de Ortodontia Dental Press. 2015;14(1).
14. Flores L, Zucchi TU, Janovich CA, Hamid TA, Pereira FF. Verticalização de molares com a utilização do bráquetes Duplo Slot relato de caso. Ortho Sci, Orthod sci pract. 2022:56-60.
15. Zucchi TU, Janovich CA. Conceito de um braquete ortodôntico autoligado ideal. Orthod Sci Pract. 2014;7(28):464-8.
16. Janovich CA, Zucchi TU, Hamid T. BRACKET ORTODÓNCICO DOBLE SLOT CONVENCIONAL.
17. Proffit WR, Fields H, Msd DM, Larson B, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics, 6e: South Asia Edition-E-Book: Elsevier India; 2019.
18. Shen G, Chen R-J, Hu Z, Qian Y-F. The effects of a newly designed twin-slot bracket on severely malpositioned teeth—a typodont experimental study. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008;30(4):401-6.
19. Minstrell J. Teaching for the development of understanding of ideas: Forces on moving objects. Ob-serving science classrooms: Observing science perspectives from research and practice. 1984:55-74.
20. Caldwell GE, Robertson DGE, Whittlesey SN. Forces and their measurement. Research methods in biomechanics. 2004:73-102.
21. Shroff B, Lindauer SJ, editors. Leveling and aligning: Challenges and solutions. Seminars in Orthodontics; 2001: Elsevier.
22. Gravina MA, Brunharo IHVP, Fraga MR, Artese F, Campos MJdS, Vitral RWF, et al. Clinical evaluation of dental alignment and leveling with three different types of orthodontic wires. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2013;18:31-7.
23. West AE, Jones ML, Newcombe RG. Multiflex versus superelastic: a randomized clinical trial of the tooth alignment ability of initial arch wires. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1995;108(5):464-71.
24. Schubert A, Jaeger F, Maltha JC, Bartzela TN. Age effect on orthodontic tooth movement rate and the composition of gingival crevicular fluid: A literature review. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie. 2020;81(2).
25. Kaklamanos EG, Makrygiannakis MA, Athanasiou AE. Could medications and biologic factors affect post‐orthodontic tooth movement changes? A systematic review of animal studies. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2021;24(1):39-51.
26. Liu X-c, Wang X-x, Zhang L-n, Yang F, Nie F-j, Zhang J. Inhibitory effects of resveratrol on orthodontic tooth movement and associated root resorption in rats. Archives of Oral Biology. 2020;111:104642.